A Real-World Analysis of Oncological Outcomes in Patients with Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Requiring Marginal Mandibulectomy for Achieving Clear Surgical Margins

Abstract

Abhinav Thaduri

Introduction Marginal mandibulectomy (MM) offers a conservative alternative to segmental resections for patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) requiring clear margins without evident bone invasion. Despite its potential benefits, real-world outcomes related to surgical margins and oncological outcomes have not been studied sufficiently.

Methods This ambispective cohort study analyzed 183 patients undergoing MM from January 2015 to March 2021 to achieve clear margins without clinical bone involvement. The primary objective is to assess the disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with OSCC requiring MM to achieve clear surgical margins, and the secondary objective is to assess the impact of microscopic bone involvement on these outcomes. Kaplan–Meier estimates facilitated the survival analysis.

Results The cohort primarily comprised males (83.2%) with a median age of 50 years, the predominant subsite being the bucco-alveolar complex (94%). Microscopic bone involvement was found in 8.74% of patients. The distribution of surgical margins was 84.24% negative, 15.22% close, and 0.54% positive. The cohort's 3-year DFS and overall survival (OS) rates are 65 and 70%, respectively. Patients with microscopic bone involvement experienced lower DFS (odds ratio [OR] = 0.251, p = 0.013), and perineural invasion was also a significant negative prognostic factor for DFS (OR = 0.4, p = 0.01). Statistical analyses revealed significant differences in survival distributions based on bone involvement (p = 0.049).

Conclusion While MM can achieve favorable surgical margins in selected OSCC patients, microscopic bone involvement compromises DFS. Given the low incidence of bone involvement and high rate of negative margins, more conservative approaches might be justified in select patients. However, these findings require further validation in a larger cohort.

Keywords

disease-free survival - marginal mandibulectomy - microscopic bone involvement - oncological outcomes - oral squamous cell carcinoma

Ethical Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Confidentiality and anonymity of the participants were strictly maintained throughout the research process.

Publication History

Received: 20 July 2024

Accepted: 12 August 2024

Article published online:
05 September 2024

• References

• 1 Cancer Today [Internet]. 2024. Accessed August 23, 2024 at: https://gco.iarc.who.int/today/
• 2 Misra S, Chaturvedi A, Misra NC. Management of gingivobuccal complex cancer. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2008; 90 (07) 546-553
• 3 Park H. Surgical margins for the extirpation of oral cancer. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 42 (06) 325-326
• 4 Rao LP, Shukla M, Sharma V, Pandey M. Mandibular conservation in oral cancer. Surg Oncol 2012; 21 (02) 109-118
• 5 Marchetta FC, Sako K, Murphy JB. The periosteum of the mandible and intraoral carcinoma. Am J Surg 1971; 122 (06) 711-713
• 6 O'Brien CJ, Adams JR, McNeil EB. et al. Influence of bone invasion and extent of mandibular resection on local control of cancers of the oral cavity and oropharynx. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003; 32 (05) 492-497
• 7 Petrovic I, Montero PH, Migliacci JC. et al. Influence of bone invasion on outcomes after marginal mandibulectomy in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2017; 45 (02) 252-257
• 8 Shah JP. The role of marginal mandibulectomy in the surgical management of oral cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002; 128 (05) 604-605
• 9 Qiao X, Liu W, Cao Y. et al. Performance of different imaging techniques in the diagnosis of head and neck cancer mandibular invasion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Oncol 2018; 86: 150-164
• 10 Li C, Yang W, Men Y, Wu F, Pan J, Li L. Magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of mandibular involvement from head and neck cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2014; 9 (11) e112267
• 11 Acton CH, Layt C, Gwynne R, Cooke R, Seaton D. Investigative modalities of mandibular invasion by squamous cell carcinoma. Laryngoscope 2000; 110 (12) 2050-2055
• 12 Randall CJ, Eyre J, Davies D, Walsh-Waring GP. Marginal mandibulectomy for malignant disease: indications, rationale, and results. J Laryngol Otol 1987; 101 (07) 676-684
• 13 Anderson CR, Sisson K, Moncrieff M. A meta-analysis of margin size and local recurrence in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol 2015; 51 (05) 464-469
• 14 Singh A, Mishra A, Singhvi H. et al. Optimum surgical margins in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue: is the current definition adequate?. Oral Oncol 2020; 111: 104938
• 15 Pathak KA, Shah BC. Marginal mandibulectomy: 11 years of institutional experience. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67 (05) 962-967
• 16 Du W, Fang Q, Wu Y, Wu J, Zhang X. Oncologic outcome of marginal mandibulectomy in squamous cell carcinoma of the lower gingiva. BMC Cancer 2019; 19 (01) 775
• 17 Chen YL, Kuo SW, Fang KH, Hao SP. Prognostic impact of marginal mandibulectomy in the presence of superficial bone invasion and the nononcologic outcome. Head Neck 2011; 33 (05) 708-713
• 18 Quintana DMVO, Dedivitis RA, Kowalski LP. Prognostic impact of perineural invasion in oral cancer: a systematic review. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2022; 42 (01) 17-25
• 19 Binmadi N, Alsharif M, Almazrooa S. et al. Perineural invasion is a significant prognostic factor in oral squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13 (21) 3339
• 20 Muscatello L, Lenzi R, Pellini R, Giudice M, Spriano G. Marginal mandibulectomy in oral cancer surgery: a 13-year experience. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2010; 267 (05) 759-764
• 21 Sukegawa S, Saika M, Tamamura R. et al. Risk factors for mandibular fracture after marginal mandibular resection. J Craniofac Surg 2020; 31 (05) 1430-1433