CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Revista Chilena de Ortopedia y Traumatología 2024; 65(02): e102-e107
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1790193
Reporte de Caso | Case Report

Ruptured Filum Terminale Ependymoma as an Uncommon Cause of Refractory Lumbosciatica in a Pregnant Patient: Case Report

Article in several languages: español | English
1   Hospital San Camilo, San Felipe, Chile
,
Manuel González
1   Hospital San Camilo, San Felipe, Chile
,
Ratko Yurac
2   Clínica Alemana de Santiago, Vitacura, Chile
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Lumbar pain and sciatica are a common complaint during pregnancy. Neoplastic etiologies, although rare, require consideration in the differential diagnosis, particularly in the presence of acute onset, severe symptoms, or neurologic deficits.

We present the case of a 33-year-old woman at 31 weeks gestation presenting with acute, progressive lumbar pain, bilateral sciatica, and motor weakness. Neurological examination revealed bilateral lower extremity motor weakness (M4) in L3, L4, and L5 myotomes, with hyperreflexia and Brudzinski and Kernig signs. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated an L2-L3 level expansive intradural lesion compressing the descending nerve roots, consistent with a filum terminale ependymoma. A cesarean section occurred at 33 weeks gestation, followed by a tumor resection three days later. Histopathology confirmed the diagnosis of a myxopapillary ependymoma. The patient experienced a favorable postoperative course, with resolution of sciatica and gradual improvement in motor function. At the four-month follow-up, she regained normal ambulation and could care for her infant independently. She returned to her work duties six months after surgery.

This case highlights the importance of considering spinal tumors in the differential diagnosis of acute lumbosacral radiculopathy with neurologic deficits during pregnancy. Early diagnosis and prompt surgical intervention can lead to a favorable outcome for both mother and baby.



Publication History

Received: 27 November 2023

Accepted: 12 August 2024

Article published online:
25 September 2024

© 2024. Sociedad Chilena de Ortopedia y Traumatologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

 
  • Referencias

  • 1 Whiles E, Shafafy R, Valsamis EM. et al. The Management of Symptomatic Lumbar Disc Herniation in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review. Global Spine J 2020; 10 (07) 908-918
  • 2 Casagrande D, Gugala Z, Clark SM, Lindsey RW. Low Back Pain and Pelvic Girdle Pain in Pregnancy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2015; 23 (09) 539-549
  • 3 Arce-Gálvez L, Méndez-Vega DA, Mancera-Álzate JM, Benavídez-Ramírez A, Rodríguez-Vélez LM. Dolor lumbar en el embarazo, aspectos fisiopatológicos y tratamiento. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol. 2022; 87 (02) 111-121
  • 4 Sehmbi H, D'Souza R, Bhatia A. Low Back Pain in Pregnancy: Investigations, Management, and Role of Neuraxial Analgesia and Anaesthesia: A Systematic Review. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2017; 82 (05) 417-436
  • 5 Hall H, Lauche R, Adams J, Steel A, Broom A, Sibbritt D. Healthcare utilisation of pregnant women who experience sciatica, leg cramps and/or varicose veins: A cross-sectional survey of 1835 pregnant women. Women Birth 2016; 29 (01) 35-40
  • 6 Kokkalaki D, Kesharwani P. Prevalence of Sciatica in Pregnancy and Its Impact on Quality of Life - A Cross Sectional Study. IJSHR 2022; 7 (02) 127-136
  • 7 Ardaillon H, Laviv Y, Arle JE, Kasper EM. Lumbar disk herniation during pregnancy: a review on general management and timing of surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2018; 160 (07) 1361-1370
  • 8 Butenschoen VM, Hitscherich H, Eicker SO. et al. Spine surgery in pregnant women: a multicenter case series and proposition of treatment algorithm. Eur Spine J 2021; 30 (04) 809-817
  • 9 Pavlidis NA. Coexistence of pregnancy and malignancy. Oncologist 2002; 7 (04) 279-287 [published correction appears in Oncologist 2002;7(6):585]
  • 10 Esmaeilzadeh M, Hong B, Polemikos M. et al. Spinal Emergency Surgery During Pregnancy: Contemporary Strategies and Outcome. World Neurosurg 2020; 139: e421-e427
  • 11 Meng T, Yin H, Li Z. et al. Therapeutic strategy and outcome of spine tumors in pregnancy: a report of 21 cases and literature review. Spine 2015; 40 (03) E146-E153
  • 12 Vougioukas VI, Kyroussis G, Gläsker S, Tatagiba M, Scheufler KM. Neurosurgical interventions during pregnancy and the puerperium: clinical considerations and management. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2004; 146 (12) 1287-1291 , discussion 1291–1292
  • 13 Reni M, Gatta G, Mazza E, Vecht C. Ependymoma. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2007; 63 (01) 81-89
  • 14 Almatrafi FR, Aseeri AM, Alqahtani MF. et al. Myxopapillary Ependymoma-a Case Report of Rare Multicentric Subtype and Literature Review. Med Arh 2023; 77 (02) 150-154
  • 15 Bagley CA, Wilson S, Kothbauer KF, Bookland MJ, Epstein F, Jallo GI. Long term outcomes following surgical resection of myxopapillary ependymomas. Neurosurg Rev 2009; 32 (03) 321-334 , discussion 334
  • 16 Leidinger W, Meierhofer JN, Ullrich V. [Unusual complication after combined spinal/epidural anaesthesia]. Anaesthesist 2003; 52 (08) 703-706
  • 17 Domazet I, Pašalić I, Nemir J, Peterković V, Vukić M. Predictors of Functional Outcome after Spinal Ependymoma Resection. J Neurosci Rural Pract 2018; 9 (03) 354-358
  • 18 Bitterman J, Donovan J, Lam M. Diagnosis and rehabilitation of a pregnant woman with spinal cord disorder due to spinal cord tumor. Spinal Cord Ser Cases 2019; 5: 8
  • 19 Smyth RM, Aflaifel N, Bamigboye AA. Interventions for varicose veins and leg oedema in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 2015 (10) CD001066
  • 20 Sabino J, Grauer JN. Pregnancy and low back pain. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2008; 1 (02) 137-141
  • 21 Lum M, Tsiouris AJ. MRI safety considerations during pregnancy. Clin Imaging 2020; 62: 69-75
  • 22 Gatta G, Di Grezia G, Cuccurullo V. et al. MRI in Pregnancy and Precision Medicine: A Review from Literature. J Pers Med 2021; 12 (01) 9
  • 23 American College of Radiology (ACR). Practice parameter for performing and interpreting magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2024-Jun-21]. Available from: https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/Practice-Parameters/MR-Perf-Interpret.pdf
  • 24 Committee Opinion No. 723: Guidelines for Diagnostic Imaging During Pregnancy and Lactation. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 130 (04) e210-e216 [published correction appears in Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Sep;132(3):786. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002858]
  • 25 Vleeming A, Albert HB, Ostgaard HC, Sturesson B, Stuge B. European guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic girdle pain. Eur Spine J 2008; 17 (06) 794-819