Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1789608
Perception of Pitch and Duration Pattern of Vowel /a/: A Comparison across Age and Gender in 5 to 9 Years Old Children

Abstract
Objectives The present study aimed to develop pitch pattern test (PPT) and duration pattern test (DPT) using vowel and investigate the temporal ordering skills among typically developing children aged 5 to 9 years across genders. The study compared the performance of children on these tests across different age groups and gender. The study also investigated the relationship between performance on the DPT and PPT tasks using the vowel /a/.
Materials and Methods Two verbal stimuli tests, DPT and PPT, were developed. For DPT, the vowel /a/ was used at 246 Hz and had two different durations of 500 and 250 ms for long and short stimuli, respectively, with a 300-ms interstimulus interval. For PPT, the vowel /a/ was used at 220 Hz for “low” stimuli and 261 Hz for “high” stimuli, both lasting 500 ms, with a 300-ms interstimulus duration and a 6-second intersequence duration.
A cross-sectional study design was utilized in the study. A total of 100 typically developing school children aged between 5 and 9 years were divided into five age groups, each consisting of 10 males and 10 females. All children passed a hearing screening at 25 dB HL from 250 Hz to 4,000 Hz and had an average or above-average academic performance as reported by their teacher. All the children were tested using the developed tests. The order of administration of DPT and PPT was randomized. Children were instructed to listen to the sequence of vowel presentations and hum them in the same order.
Results There was no significant difference between scores of males and females across all the age groups. On both tests, there was a significant improvement in the performance of the children with increase in age. There was a strong overall correlation between scores of DPT and PPT.
Conclusion Both DPT and PPT, utilizing vowels as stimuli, did not exhibit a ceiling effect. This study highlighted a robust correlation between the two tests.
Authors' Contributions
A.K.N.: Contribution: conceptualization; data curation; formal analysis; investigation; methodology; project administration; resources; software; roles/writing - original draft; writing - editing; C.S.V.: Contribution: conceptualization; data curation; formal analysis; investigation; methodology; resources; supervision; roles/writing - original draft; writing - review and editing.
Ethical Approval
The study was approved by the research advisory committee and the Institutional Ethics Committee (REF: BVDUMC/IEC/190, dated: August 17, 2022). Informed assent was taken from the children participating in the study.
Publication History
Article published online:
28 August 2024
© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Pinheiro ML, Musiek FE. Sequencing and temporal ordering in the auditory system. In: Pinheiro ML, Musiek FE. eds. Assessment of Central Auditory Dysfunction: Foundations and Clinical Correlates. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1985: 219-238
- 2 Fitzgibbons PJ, Gordon-Salant S. Auditory temporal processing in elderly listeners. J Am Acad Audiol 1996; 7 (03) 183-189
- 3 Bellis TJ. Assessment and Management of Central Auditory Processing Disorders in the Educational Setting: From Science to Practice. New York: Thomson Delmar Learning; 2003
- 4 Emanuel DC, Ficca KN, Korczak P. Survey of the diagnosis and management of auditory processing disorder. Am J Audiol 2011; 20 (01) 48-60
- 5 Bamiou DE, Musiek FE, Stow I. et al. Auditory temporal processing deficits in patients with insular stroke. Neurology 2006; 67 (04) 614-619
- 6 Humes LE, Coughlin M, Talley L. Evaluation of the use of a new compact disc for auditory perceptual assessment in the elderly. J Am Acad Audiol 1996; 7 (06) 419-427
- 7 Musiek FE. Frequency (pitch) and duration pattern tests. J Am Acad Audiol 1994; 5 (04) 265-268
- 8 Musiek FE, Pinheiro ML, Wilson DH. Auditory pattern perception in ‘split brain’ patients. Arch Otolaryngol 1980; 106 (10) 610-612
- 9 Pinheiro ML. A central auditory test profile of learning disabled children with dyslexia. In: Bradford LJ. ed. Communication Disorder: An Audio Journal for Continuing Education. New York: Grune and Stratton; 1978
- 10 Tiwari S. Maturational Effect of Pitch Pattern Sequence Test [Master dissertation]. Karnataka, India: University of Mysore; 2003
- 11 Wilson WJ, Arnott W. Using different criteria to diagnose (central) auditory processing disorder: how big a difference does it make?. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2013; 56 (01) 63-70
- 12 Balen SA, Moore DR, Sameshima K. Pitch and duration pattern sequence tests in 7-to 11-year-old children: results depend on response mode. J Am Acad Audiol 2019; 30 (01) 6-15
- 13 Yathiraj A, Vanaja CS. Age related changes in auditory processes in children aged 6 to 10 years. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 79 (08) 1224-1234
- 14 Musiek FE, Gollegly KM, Baran JA. Myelination of the corpus callosum and auditory processing problems in children: theoretical and clinical correlates. Semin Hear 1984; 5 (03) 231-240
- 15 Silva RD, Oliveira CM, Cardoso AC. Application of temporal pattern tests in children with persistent developmental stuttering. Rev CEFAC 2011; 13 (05) 902-908
- 16 Lotfi Y, Dastgerdi ZH, Farazi M, Moossavi A, Bakhshi E. Auditory temporal processing assessment in children with developmental stuttering. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2020; 132: 109935
- 17 Jain C, Priya MB, Joshi K. Relationship between temporal processing and phonological awareness in children with speech sound disorders. Clin Linguist Phon 2020; 34 (06) 566-575
- 18 McGivern RF, Berka C, Languis ML, Chapman S. Detection of deficits in temporal pattern discrimination using the seashore rhythm test in young children with reading impairments. J Learn Disabil 1991; 24 (01) 58-62
- 19 Rowe EJ, Cake LJ. Retention of order information for sounds and words. Can J Psychol 1977; 31 (01) 14-23
- 20 Koravand A, Jutras B, Roumy N. Peripheral hearing loss and auditory temporal ordering ability in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2010; 74 (01) 50-55
- 21 Jutras B, Gagné JP. Auditory sequential organization among children with and without a hearing loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1999; 42 (03) 553-567
- 22 Conrad R. Acoustic confusion in immediate memory. Br J Psychol 1964; 55 (01) 75-84
- 23 Aaronson D. Temporal factors in perception and short-term memory. Psychol Bull 1967; 67 (02) 130-144
- 24 Norman DA, Rumelhart DE. A system for perception and memory. In: Norman DA. ed. Models of Human Memory. New York: Academic Press Inc; 1970: 19-64
- 25 Gupta S, Neupane AK. Comparing pitch pattern tests based on vowels and tones. J Hear Sci 2023; 13 (04) 27-31
- 26 Boersma P. Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. 2013 . Accessed August 13, 2024 at: http://www.praat.org/retrieved
- 27 Yathiraj A, Mascarenhas K. Auditory profile of children with suspected auditory processing disorder. J Indian Speech Hear Assoc. 2004; 18 (01) 5-13
- 28 Musiek FE. The frequency pattern test: a guide. Hear J 2002; 55 (06) 58
- 29 Weihing J, Guenette L, Chermak G. et al. Characteristics of pediatric performance on a test battery commonly used in the diagnosis of central auditory processing disorder. J Am Acad Audiol 2015; 26 (07) 652-669
- 30 Majak J, Zamysłowska-Szmytke E, Rajkowska E, Śliwińska-Kowalska M. Auditory temporal processing tests–normative data for Polish-speaking adults. Med Pr 2015; 66 (02) 145-152
- 31 Frederigue-Lopes NB, Bevilacqua MC, Sameshima K, Costa OA. Performance of typical children in free field auditory temporal tests. Pro Fono 2010; 22 (02) 83-88
- 32 Werner LA. Issues in human auditory development. J Commun Disord 2007; 40 (04) 275-283
- 33 Moore DR, Cowan JA, Riley A, Edmondson-Jones AM, Ferguson MA. Development of auditory processing in 6- to 11-yr-old children. Ear Hear 2011; 32 (03) 269-285
- 34 Sanes DH, Woolley SM. A behavioral framework to guide research on central auditory development and plasticity. Neuron 2011; 72 (06) 912-929
- 35 Huyck JJ, Wright BA. Late maturation of auditory perceptual learning. Dev Sci 2011; 14 (03) 614-621
- 36 Musiek FE, Baran JA, Pinheiro ML. Duration pattern recognition in normal subjects and patients with cerebral and cochlear lesions. Audiology 1990; 29 (06) 304-313