Artificial Intelligence Applications for Imaging Metabolic Bone Diseases

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has significantly impacted the field of medical imaging, particularly in diagnosing and managing metabolic bone diseases (MBDs) such as osteoporosis and osteopenia, Paget's disease, osteomalacia, and rickets, as well as rare conditions such as osteitis fibrosa cystica and osteogenesis imperfecta. This article provides an in-depth analysis of AI techniques used in imaging these conditions, recent advancements, and their clinical applications. It also explores ethical considerations and future perspectives. Through comprehensive examination and case studies, we highlight the transformative potential of AI in enhancing diagnostic accuracy, improving patient outcomes, and contributing to personalized medicine. By integrating AI with existing imaging techniques, we can significantly enhance the capabilities of medical imaging in diagnosing, monitoring, and treating MBDs. We also provide a comprehensive overview of the current state, challenges, and future prospects of AI applications in this crucial area of health care.

Keywords

artificial intelligence - deep learning - machine learning - natural language processing - computer vision

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
15. Oktober 2024

• References

• 1 Bazzocchi A, Isaac A, Dalili D. et al. Imaging of metabolic bone diseases: the spine view, Part I. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2022; 26 (04) 478-490
• 2 Aparisi Gómez MP, Isaac A, Dalili D. et al. Imaging of metabolic bone diseases: the spine view, Part II. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2022; 26 (04) 491-500
• 3 Wáng YXJ, Diacinti D, Aparisi Gómez MP. et al. Radiological diagnosis of prevalent osteoporotic vertebral fracture on radiographs: an interim consensus from a group of experts of the ESSR osteoporosis and metabolism subcommittee. Skeletal Radiol 2024; April 25 (Epub ahead of print)
• 4 Tran T, Bliuc D, van Geel T. et al. Population-wide impact of non-hip non-vertebral fractures on mortality. J Bone Miner Res 2017; 32 (09) 1802-1810
• 5 Hirsch JA, Zini C, Anselmetti GC. et al. Vertebral augmentation: is it time to get past the pain? A consensus statement from the Sardinia Spine and Stroke Congress. Medicina (Kaunas) 2022; 58 (10) 1431
• 6 Gao L, Jiao T, Feng Q, Wang W. Application of artificial intelligence in diagnosis of osteoporosis using medical images: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 2021; 32 (07) 1279-1286
• 7 Hong N, Whittier DE, Glüer CC, Leslie WD. The potential role for artificial intelligence in fracture risk prediction. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2024;S2213-8587(24)00153-0
• 8 Kong SH, Shin CS. Applications of machine learning in bone and mineral research. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) 2021; 36 (05) 928-937
• 9 Weber MA, Bazzocchi A, Nöbauer-Huhmann IM. Tumors of the spine: when can biopsy be avoided?. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2022; 26 (04) 453-468
• 10 Fang K, Zheng X, Lin X, Dai Z. A comprehensive approach for osteoporosis detection through chest CT analysis and bone turnover markers: harnessing radiomics and deep learning techniques. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2024; 15: 1296047
• 11 Dalili D, Bazzocchi A, Dalili DE, Guglielmi G, Isaac A. The role of body composition assessment in obesity and eating disorders. Eur J Radiol 2020; 131: 109227
• 12 Murata K, Endo K, Aihara T. et al. Artificial intelligence for the detection of vertebral fractures on plain spinal radiography. Sci Rep 2020; 10 (01) 20031
• 13 Genant HK, Wu CY, van Kuijk C, Nevitt MC. Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res 1993; 8 (09) 1137-1148
• 14 Nguyen TV. Individualized fracture risk assessment: state-of-the-art and room for improvement. Osteoporos Sarcopenia 2018; 4 (01) 2-10
• 15 Leslie WD, Binkley N, McCloskey EV. et al. FRAX adjustment by Trabecular Bone Score with or without bone mineral density: the Manitoba BMD Registry. J Clin Densitom 2023; 26 (03) 101378
• 16 Dalili D, Isaac A, Garnon J, Cazzato RL, Gangi A. Towards personalized musculoskeletal interventional oncology: enhanced image-guided biopsies and interventions. Semin Roentgenol 2022; 57 (03) 201-211
• 17 Dalili D, Isaac A, Rashidi A, Åström G, Fritz J. Image-guided sports medicine and musculoskeletal tumor interventions: a patient-centered model. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2020; 24 (03) 290-309
• 18 Gazzotti S, Aparisi Gómez MP, Schileo E. et al. High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography: research or clinical practice?. Br J Radiol 2023; 96 (1150) 20221016
• 19 Üstün F, Ustabaşıoğlu FE, Tokuç B, Bülbül BY, Çelik M, Aytürk S. Paget's disease of the bone found incidentally on F-18 FDG PET/CT: clinical significance and differential diagnostic criteria. Acta Endocrinol (Bucur) 2023; 19 (03) 292-300
• 20 Cheung H, Yechoor A, Behnia F. et al. Common skeletal neoplasms and nonneoplastic lesions at ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT. Radiographics 2022; 42 (01) 250-267
• 21 Lim DSW, Makmur A, Zhu L. et al. Improved productivity using deep learning-assisted reporting for lumbar spine MRI. Radiology 2022; 305 (01) 160-166
• 22 Shayganfar A, Khodayi M, Ebrahimian S, Tabrizi Z. Quantitative diagnosis of osteoporosis using lumbar spine signal intensity in magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Radiol 2019; 92 (1097) 20180774
• 23 Bandirali M, Di Leo G, Papini GD. et al. A new diagnostic score to detect osteoporosis in patients undergoing lumbar spine MRI. Eur Radiol 2015; 25 (10) 2951-2959
• 24 Tabor E, Pluskiewicz W, Tabor K. Clinical conformity between heel ultrasound and densitometry in postmenopausal women: a systematic review. J Ultrasound Med 2018; 37 (02) 363-369
• 25 de Vries BCS, Hegeman JH, Nijmeijer W, Geerdink J, Seifert C, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM. Comparing three machine learning approaches to design a risk assessment tool for future fractures: predicting a subsequent major osteoporotic fracture in fracture patients with osteopenia and osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 2021; 32 (03) 437-449
• 26 Khan O, Badhiwala JH, Grasso G, Fehlings MG. Use of machine learning and artificial intelligence to drive personalized medicine approaches for spine care. World Neurosurg 2020; 140: 512-518
• 27 Aggarwal R, Sounderajah V, Martin G. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of deep learning in medical imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. NPJ Digit Med 2021; 4 (01) 65
• 28 Litjens G, Kooi T, Bejnordi BE. et al. A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis. Med Image Anal 2017; 42: 60-88
• 29 Ong JCL, Chang SY, William W. et al. Ethical and regulatory challenges of large language models in medicine. Lancet Digit Health 2024; 6 (06) e428-e432
• 30 Schonfeld E, de Lotbiniere-Bassett M, Jansen T, Anthony D, Veeravagu A. Vertebrae segmentation in reduced radiation CT imaging for augmented reality applications. Int J CARS 2022; 17 (04) 775-783
• 31 Greffier J, Frandon J, Durand Q. et al. Contribution of an artificial intelligence deep-learning reconstruction algorithm for dose optimization in lumbar spine CT examination: A phantom study. Diagn Interv Imaging 2023; 104 (02) 76-83
• 32 Sekuboyina A, Husseini ME, Bayat A. et al. VerSe: A vertebrae labelling and segmentation benchmark for multi-detector CT images. Med Image Anal 2021; 73: 102166
• 33 Tsai DJ, Lin C, Lin CS, Lee CC, Wang CH, Fang WH. Artificial intelligence-enabled chest X-ray classifies osteoporosis and identifies mortality risk. J Med Syst 2024; 48 (01) 12
• 34 Levi R, Garoli F, Battaglia M. et al. CT-based radiomics can identify physiological modifications of bone structure related to subjects' age and sex. Radiol Med (Torino) 2023; 128 (06) 744-754
• 35 Lambin P, Leijenaar RTH, Deist TM. et al. Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2017; 14 (12) 749-762
• 36 Haarburger C, Müller-Franzes G, Weninger L, Kuhl C, Truhn D, Merhof D. Radiomics feature reproducibility under inter-rater variability in segmentations of CT images. Sci Rep 2020; 10 (01) 12688
• 37 Cobo M, Menéndez Fernández-Miranda P, Bastarrika G, Lloret Iglesias L. Enhancing radiomics and Deep Learning systems through the standardization of medical imaging workflows. Sci Data 2023; 10 (01) 732
• 38 Chianca V, Cuocolo R, Gitto S. et al. Radiomic machine learning classifiers in spine bone tumors: a multi-software, multi-scanner study. Eur J Radiol 2021; 137: 109586
• 39 Xue Z, Huo J, Sun X. et al. Using radiomic features of lumbar spine CT images to differentiate osteoporosis from normal bone density. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 23 (01) 336
• 40 Anderson PG, Baum GL, Keathley N. et al. Deep learning assistance closes the accuracy gap in fracture detection across clinician types. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2023; 481 (03) 580-588
• 41 Fu T, Viswanathan V, Attia A. et al. Assessing the potential of a deep learning tool to improve fracture detection by radiologists and emergency physicians on extremity radiographs. Acad Radiol 2024; 31 (05) 1989-1999
• 42 Dallora AL, Anderberg P, Kvist O, Mendes E, Diaz Ruiz S, Sanmartin Berglund J. Bone age assessment with various machine learning techniques: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2019; 14 (07) e0220242
• 43 Martin DD, Calder AD, Ranke MB, Binder G, Thodberg HH. Accuracy and self-validation of automated bone age determination. Sci Rep 2022; 12 (01) 6388
• 44 Lee BD, Lee MS. Automated bone age assessment using artificial intelligence: the future of bone age assessment. Korean J Radiol 2021; 22 (05) 792-800
• 45 Booz C, Yel I, Wichmann JL. et al. Artificial intelligence in bone age assessment: accuracy and efficiency of a novel fully automated algorithm compared to the Greulich-Pyle method. Eur Radiol Exp 2020; 4 (01) 6
• 46 van Rijn RR, Thodberg HH. Bone age assessment: automated techniques coming of age?. Acta Radiol 2013; 54 (09) 1024-1029
• 47 Thodberg HH, Sävendahl L. Validation and reference values of automated bone age determination for four ethnicities. Acad Radiol 2010; 17 (11) 1425-1432
• 48 Thodberg HH. Clinical review: an automated method for determination of bone age. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009; 94 (07) 2239-2244
• 49 Thodberg HH, Kreiborg S, Juul A, Pedersen KD. The BoneXpert method for automated determination of skeletal maturity. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2009; 28 (01) 52-66
• 50 Wang F, Gu X, Chen S. et al. Artificial intelligence system can achieve comparable results to experts for bone age assessment of Chinese children with abnormal growth and development. PeerJ 2020; 8: e8854
• 51 Satoh M. Bone age: assessment methods and clinical applications. Clin Pediatr Endocrinol 2015; 24 (04) 143-152
• 52 Kim PH, Yoon HM, Kim JR. et al. Bone age assessment using artificial intelligence in Korean pediatric population: a comparison of deep-learning models trained with healthy chronological and Greulich-Pyle ages as labels. Korean J Radiol 2023; 24 (11) 1151-1163
• 53 Kim JR, Shim WH, Yoon HM. et al. Computerized bone age estimation using deep learning based program: evaluation of the accuracy and efficiency. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2017; 209 (06) 1374-1380
• 54 Wang F, Cidan W, Gu X. et al. Performance of an artificial intelligence system for bone age assessment in Tibet. Br J Radiol 2021; 94 (1120) 20201119
• 55 Han K, Song K, Choi BW. How to develop, validate, and compare clinical prediction models involving radiological parameters: study design and statistical methods. Korean J Radiol 2016; 17 (03) 339-350
• 56 Cortese G. How to use statistical models and methods for clinical prediction. Ann Transl Med 2020; 8 (04) 76
• 57 Su TL, Jaki T, Hickey GL, Buchan I, Sperrin M. A review of statistical updating methods for clinical prediction models. Stat Methods Med Res 2018; 27 (01) 185-197
• 58 Riley RD, Collins GS. Stability of clinical prediction models developed using statistical or machine learning methods. Biom J 2023; 65 (08) e2200302
• 59 Staffa SJ, Zurakowski D. Statistical development and validation of clinical prediction models. Anesthesiology 2021; 135 (03) 396-405
• 60 Collins GS, Moons KGM, Dhiman P. et al. TRIPOD+AI statement: updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods. BMJ 2024; 385: e078378
• 61 Zabihiyeganeh M, Mirzaei A, Tabrizian P. et al. Prediction of subsequent fragility fractures: application of machine learning. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2024; 25 (01) 438
• 62 Gui C, Chen X, Sheikh K. et al. Radiomic modeling to predict risk of vertebral compression fracture after stereotactic body radiation therapy for spinal metastases. J Neurosurg Spine 2021; 36 (02) 294-302
• 63 Hung TNK, Le NQK, Le NH. et al. An AI-based prediction model for drug-drug interactions in osteoporosis and Paget's diseases from SMILES. Mol Inform 2022; 41 (06) e2100264
• 64 Sosa BR, Cung M, Suhardi VJ. et al. Capacity for large language model chatbots to aid in orthopedic management, research, and patient queries. J Orthop Res 2024; 42 (06) 1276-1282
• 65 Ahmed W, Saturno M, Rajjoub R. et al. ChatGPT versus NASS clinical guidelines for degenerative spondylolisthesis: a comparative analysis. Eur Spine J 2024; March 15 (Epub ahead of print)
• 66 Chen Y, Esmaeilzadeh P. Generative AI in medical practice: in-depth exploration of privacy and security challenges. J Med Internet Res 2024; 26: e53008
• 67 Boyanov MA. Whole body and regional bone mineral content and density in women aged 20–75 years. Acta Endocrinol (Bucur) 2016; 12 (02) 191-196
• 68 Yosinski J, Clune J, Bengio Y, Lipson H. How transferable are features in deep neural networks?. ArXiv 2014 ; abstract available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.1792 . Accessed August 5, 2024
• 69 Pan SJ, Yang Q. A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 2010; 22: 1345-1359
• 70 Compte R, Granville Smith I, Isaac A. et al. Are current machine learning applications comparable to radiologist classification of degenerate and herniated discs and Modic change? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 2023; 32 (11) 3764-3787
• 71 Vasiljeva K, van Duren BH, Pandit H. Changing device regulations in the European Union: impact on research, innovation and clinical practice. Indian J Orthop 2020; 54 (02) 123-129
• 72 Niemiec E. Will the EU medical device regulation help to improve the safety and performance of medical AI devices?. Digit Health 2022 ;8:20552076221089079
• 73 Fraser AG, Biasin E, Bijnens B. et al. Artificial intelligence in medical device software and high-risk medical devices—a review of definitions, expert recommendations and regulatory initiatives. Expert Rev Med Devices 2023; 20 (06) 467-491
• 74 Thomas L, Hyde C, Mullarkey D, Greenhalgh J, Kalsi D, Ko J. Real-world post-deployment performance of a novel machine learning-based digital health technology for skin lesion assessment and suggestions for post-market surveillance. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10: 1264846
• 75 Zinchenko VV, Arzamasov KM, Chetverikov SF. et al. Methodology for conducting post-marketing surveillance of software as a medical device based on artificial intelligence technologies. Sovrem Tekhnologii Med 2022; 14 (05) 15-23
• 76 Kim DW, Jang HY, Kim KW, Shin Y, Park SH. Design characteristics of studies reporting the performance of artificial intelligence algorithms for diagnostic analysis of medical images: results from recently published papers. Korean J Radiol 2019; 20 (03) 405-410
• 77 Steffens D, Hancock MJ, Pereira LS, Kent PM, Latimer J, Maher CG. Do MRI findings identify patients with low back pain or sciatica who respond better to particular interventions? A systematic review. Eur Spine J 2016; 25 (04) 1170-1187
• 78 Liu X, Faes L, Kale AU. et al. A comparison of deep learning performance against health-care professionals in detecting diseases from medical imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Digit Health 2019; 1 (06) e271-e297
• 79 Alukaev D, Kiselev S, Mustafaev T, Ainur A, Ibragimov B, Vrtovec T. A deep learning framework for vertebral morphometry and Cobb angle measurement with external validation. Eur Spine J 2022; 31 (08) 2115-2124
• 80 Cabrera A, Bouterse A, Nelson M. et al. Accounting for age in prediction of discharge destination following elective lumbar fusion: a supervised machine learning approach. Spine J 2023; 23 (07) 997-1006
• 81 Walston SL, Seki H, Takita H. et al. Data set terminology of deep learning in medicine: a historical review and recommendation. . Jpn J Radiol 2024