RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1789003
Evaluation of Mechanical and Elemental Properties of Bioceramic-Coated Orthodontic Brackets and Enamel Surface

Abstract
Objective The aim is to coat orthodontic brackets with two different bioactive materials and to compare the mechanical and morphological properties of coated brackets and tooth surfaces.
Materials and Methods A total of 120 stainless steel brackets were divided equally into three groups, that is, the uncoated brackets and nanohydroxyapatite (nHA)-coated, and nanobioactive glass (nBG)-coated brackets using a spin coater machine. The brackets were bonded on the enamel surface and underwent remineralization/demineralization cycles for days 1, 7, 14, and 30. At each time interval, the bond strength of the brackets was assessed using mechanical loading. An optical and scanning electron microscope (SEM) were used for surface evaluation, and the adhesive remanent index (ARI) values were obtained and quantified.
Statistical Analysis One-way analysis of variance using Tukey's test was used to compare the differences among the groups.
Results A uniform distribution of nanoparticles occurred on the surfaces of brackets. The shear bond strength (SBS) showed no significant differences in any tested groups on days 1, 7, and 14. However, control and nBG showed a significant difference from nHA at day 30. On days 7, 14, and 30, the nHA group showed the highest SBS values among the groups. For ARI, most samples showed an adhesive nature of failure at the enamel–brackets interface. The images confirmed the presence of coated particles on brackets and remnants of adhesives after SBS.
Conclusion This study confirmed that the nHA- and nBG-coated brackets have a high potential for application in orthodontics regarding structural and mechanical properties.
Keywords
dental - white spots - orthodontic brackets - orthodontic adhesives - hydroxyapatite - bioactive glass - spin coating - shear strengthPublikationsverlauf
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
18. September 2024
© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Cho M-Y, Lee D-W, Kim I-S. et al. Evaluation of structural and mechanical properties of aerosol-deposited bioceramic films for orthodontic brackets. J Ceram Int 2019; 45: 6702-6711
- 2 Lee SM, Yoo KH, Yoon SY. et al. Enamel anti-demineralization effect of orthodontic adhesive containing bioactive glass and graphene oxide: an in-vitro study. Materials (Basel) 2018; 11 (09) 1728
- 3 Arash V, Keikhaee F, Rabiee SM, Rajabnia R, Khafri S, Tavanafar S. Evaluation of antibacterial effects of silver-coated stainless steel orthodontic brackets. J Dent (Tehran) 2016; 13 (01) 49-54
- 4 Sallum EJ, Nouer DF, Klein MI. et al. Clinical and microbiologic changes after removal of orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 126 (03) 363-366
- 5 Sioustis I, Martu M-A, Luchian I. et al. Clinical effects of orthodontic treatment on periodontal status. Med Dent Educ 2019; 8: 57-66
- 6 Fatani EJ, Almutairi HH, Alharbi AO. et al. In vitro assessment of stainless steel orthodontic brackets coated with titanium oxide mixed Ag for anti-adherent and antibacterial properties against Streptococcus mutans and Porphyromonas gingivalis . Microb Pathog 2017; 112: 190-194
- 7 Longoni JN, Lopes BMV, Freires IA, Dutra KL, Franco A, Paranhos LR. Self-ligating versus conventional metallic brackets on Streptococcus mutans retention: A systematic review. Eur J Dent 2017; 11 (04) 537-547
- 8 Ashtekar S, Shetty P, Deshpande R. et al. Evaluation of the shear bond strength of lingual brackets manufactured by three different processes using two different adhesive primers: An in vitro study. J Indian Orthod Soc 2016; 50: 240-245
- 9 Featherstone JD. Remineralization, the natural caries repair process–the need for new approaches. Adv Dent Res 2009; 21 (01) 4-7
- 10 Nasim I, Jain S, Soni S. et al. Bioceramics in operative dentistry and endodontics. Int J Med Oral Res 2016; 1: 1-8
- 11 Tavoni M, Dapporto M, Tampieri A. et al. Bioactive calcium phosphate-based composites for bone regeneration. J Comp Sci 2021; 5: 227
- 12 Khan AS, Syed MR. A review of bioceramics-based dental restorative materials. Dent Mater J 2019; 38 (02) 163-176
- 13 Chen L, Al-Bayatee S, Khurshid Z, Shavandi A, Brunton P, Ratnayake J. Hydroxyapatite in oral care products—a review. Materials (Basel) 2021; 14 (17) 4865
- 14 Kawaguchi K, Iijima M, Endo K. et al. Electrophoretic deposition as a new bioactive glass coating process for orthodontic stainless steel. Coatings 2017; 7: 199
- 15 Arango S, Peláez-Vargas A, García C. Coating and surface treatments on orthodontic metallic materials. Coatings 2012; 3: 1-15
- 16 Boccaccini AR, Minay E, Krause D. Bioglass® coatings on superelastic NiTi wires by electrophoretic deposition (EPD). In: Key Engineering Materials. Stafa-Zurich, Switzerland: Trans Tech Publications Ltd.; 2006: 219-224
- 17 Al Shehab A, Bakry AS, Hill R, Alsulaimani FF, Abbassy MA. Evaluation of bioactive glass and low viscosity resin as orthodontic enamel sealer: an in vitro study. J Funct Biomater 2022; 13 (04) 191
- 18 Amirtharaj Mosas KK, Chandrasekar AR, Dasan A, Pakseresht A, Galusek D. Recent advancements in materials and coatings for biomedical implants. Gels 2022; 8 (05) 323
- 19 Cañas E, Vicent M, Bannier E. et al. Effect of particle size on processing of bioactive glass powder for atmospheric plasma spraying. J Eur Ceram Soc 2016; 36: 837-845
- 20 Liu M-J, Zhang M, Zhang X-F. et al. Transport and deposition behaviors of vapor coating materials in plasma spray-physical vapor deposition. Appl Surf Sci 2019; 486: 80-92
- 21 Smeets R, Stadlinger B, Schwarz F. et al. Impact of dental implant surface modifications on osseointegration. BioMed Res Int 2016; 2016: 6285620
- 22 Sergi R, Bellucci D, Cannillo VJC. A comprehensive review of bioactive glass coatings: state of the art, challenges and future perspectives. Coatings 2020; 10: 757
- 23 Sahu N, Parija B, Panigrahi S. Fundamental understanding and modeling of spin coating process: a review. Indian J Phys 2009; 83: 493-502
- 24 Nazir R, Samad Khan A, Ahmed A. et al. Synthesis and in-vitro cytotoxicity analysis of microwave irradiated nano-apatites. Ceram Int 2013; 39: 4339-4347
- 25 Malik QUA, Iftikhar S, Zahid S. et al. Smart injectable self-setting bioceramics for dental applications. Mater Sci Eng C 2020; 113: 110956
- 26 Lwanga SK, Lemeshow S. Sample Size Determination in Health Studies: A Practical Manual. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1991: 1-22
- 27 da Silva Fidalgo TK, Pithon MM, do Santos RL, de Alencar NA, Abrahão AC, Maia LC. Influence of topical fluoride application on mechanical properties of orthodontic bonding materials under pH cycling. Angle Orthod 2012; 82 (06) 1071-1077
- 28 Firzok H, Zahid S, Asad S. et al. Sol-gel derived fluoridated and non-fluoridated bioactive glass ceramics-based dental adhesives: compositional effect on re-mineralization around orthodontic brackets. J Non-Cryst Solids 2019; 521: 1016
- 29 Årtun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod 1984; 85 (04) 333-340
- 30 Chambers C, Stewart S, Su B, Sandy J, Ireland A. Prevention and treatment of demineralisation during fixed appliance therapy: a review of current methods and future applications. Br Dent J 2013; 215 (10) 505-511
- 31 Philip N. State of the art enamel remineralization systems: the next frontier in caries management. Caries Res 2019; 53 (03) 284-295
- 32 Mirhashemi A, Jazi L. Evaluation of the effect of antimicrobial nanoparticles on bond strength of orthodontic adhesives: a review article. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2021; 18: 110
- 33 Iglesias A, Flores T, Moyano J, Artés M, Gil FJ, Puigdollers A. In vitro study of shear bond strength in direct and indirect bonding with three types of adhesive systems. Materials (Basel) 2020; 13 (11) 2644
- 34 Atik E, Gorucu-Coskuner H, Taner T. Clinical performance of precoated brackets and self-etch bonding technique: a prospective comparative study. Clin Oral Investig 2019; 23 (06) 2813-2821
- 35 Griffin J, Ruddy M, Mavreas D, Nace S, Vande Vannet B, Stanton KT. Comparison of shear bond strength and ARI of four different adhesive systems used to bond molar tubes: an in vitro study. Int Orthod 2021; 19 (01) 117-122
- 36 Mahmoud E, Pacurar M, Bechir ES. et al. Comparison of shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index of brackets bonded with two types of orthodontic adhesives. Mater Plast 2017; 54: 141
- 37 Shirazi M, Sadeghi MJ. The evaluation of shear bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cement with the addition of 45S5 bioactive glass using two conventional methods. J Oral Res 2020; 9: 250-258
- 38 Kishore G, Sai-Sankar AJ, Pratap-Gowd M, Sridhar M, Pranitha K, Sai-Krishna VS. Comparative evaluation of fluoride releasing ability of various restorative materials after the application of surface coating agents - an in-vitro study. J Clin Diagn Res 2016; 10 (12) ZC38-ZC41
- 39 Okulus Z, Buchwald T, Voelkel A. Calcium release from experimental dental materials. Mater Sci Eng C 2016; 68: 213-220
- 40 Langhorst SE, O'Donnell JNR, Skrtic D. In vitro remineralization of enamel by polymeric amorphous calcium phosphate composite: quantitative microradiographic study. Dent Mater 2009; 25 (07) 884-891
- 41 Jardim RN, Rocha AA, Rossi AM. et al. Fabrication and characterization of remineralizing dental composites containing hydroxyapatite nanoparticles. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2020; 109: 103817
- 42 Sarin S, Rekhi A. Bioactive glass: a potential next generation biomaterial. J Res Dent Sci 2016; 7: 27-32
- 43 Chaichana W, Insee K, Chanachai S. et al. Physical/mechanical and antibacterial properties of orthodontic adhesives containing Sr-bioactive glass nanoparticles, calcium phosphate, and andrographolide. Sci Rep 2022; 12 (01) 6635
- 44 Alamri A, Salloot Z, Alshaia A, Ibrahim MS. The effect of bioactive glass-enhanced orthodontic bonding resins on prevention of demineralization: a systematic review. Molecules 2020; 25 (11) 2495
- 45 Kim YM, Kim DH, Song CW. et al. Antibacterial and remineralization effects of orthodontic bonding agents containing bioactive glass. Korean J Orthod 2018; 48 (03) 163-171
- 46 Par M, Gubler A, Attin T. et al. Effect of adhesive coating on calcium, phosphate, and fluoride release from experimental and commercial remineralizing dental restorative materials. Sci Rep 2022; 12 (01) 10272
- 47 Melo MAS, Weir MD, Rodrigues LKA, Xu HH. Novel calcium phosphate nanocomposite with caries-inhibition in a human in situ model. Dent Mater 2013; 29 (02) 231-240
- 48 Bowen WH. The Stephan curve revisited. Odontology 2013; 101 (01) 2-8
- 49 Ghaleb L, Al-Worafi NA, Thawaba A. et al. Evaluation of enamel surface integrity after orthodontic bracket debonding: comparison of three different system. BMC Oral Health 2024; 24 (01) 358
- 50 Tripathi V, Assudani N, Alasmari AS, Meher J, Khan SH, Khan SSMN. Comparative study of microbial adhesion on different orthodontic brackets - an in vivo study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2023; 15 (Suppl. 02) S1270-S1273