Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2025; 38(03): 097-102
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1788771
Original Research

Does the Craniolateral Approach Provide Better Exposure to the Radius than the Craniomedial Approach for Internal Fracture Fixation in Dogs?

Kuan-Ting Lin
1   Animal Surgical Center of Michigan, Flint, Michigan, United States
,
Daniel A. Degner
1   Animal Surgical Center of Michigan, Flint, Michigan, United States
,
Charles E. DeCamp
1   Animal Surgical Center of Michigan, Flint, Michigan, United States
› Author Affiliations

Funding This study was funded by the Animal Surgical Center of Michigan, Flint, Michigan, United States.
Preview

Abstract

Objectives

To compare the exposure of the craniolateral approach (CLA) with craniomedial approach (CMA) of the radius in dogs. To make general observations of each approach that may affect the ease of fracture repair.

Study Design

Six canine cadavers were used in the study to compare the exposed surface area, length, and width of radius with CLA and CMA (n = 12).

Results

The CLA exposed a larger surface area of the radius compared with the CMA (p = 0.01). The CLA of the radius had greater proximal width compared with the CMA (p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in the length of exposed radii with either approach.

Conclusion

The CLA provided greater exposure for internal fixation of the radius in dogs.

Authors' Contribution

K.T.L.: concept—lead; data curation—lead; study design—lead; data analysis and interpretation—lead; revising and draft—lead. D.A.D.: concept—lead; data curation—equal; study design—lead; data analysis and interpretation—partial; revising and draft—equal. C.E.D.: concept—partial; study design—partial; revising—partial.




Publication History

Received: 09 January 2024

Accepted: 08 July 2024

Article published online:
13 March 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany