CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Asian J Neurosurg 2024; 19(04): 659-665
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1788680
Original Article

PL-TOSP, the Novel Entry Point in Transforaminal Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Radiological Analysis with Prospective Surgical Evaluation and Review of Literature of Various Skin Entry Points

Prasad Patgaonkar
1   Department of Spine Surgery, Indore Spine Center, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
,
1   Department of Spine Surgery, Indore Spine Center, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
,
Sagar Kokate
1   Department of Spine Surgery, Indore Spine Center, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
,
1   Department of Spine Surgery, Indore Spine Center, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
,
Vivek Patel
1   Department of Spine Surgery, Indore Spine Center, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
,
Ravi Patel
1   Department of Spine Surgery, Indore Spine Center, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Objective Aim of this study was to analyze variation in angulation of trajectories of various skin entry points in transforaminal endoscopic spine surgery with change in the physical parameters, namely, weight, abdominal girth, and body mass index and to validate our hypothesis that posterolateral (PL)-tip of spinous process (TOSP) entry has minimal variation in the angle of trajectory as compared with currently available skin entry points. The study included an analysis of the functional outcomes of these patients who underwent transforaminal endoscopy using the novel PL-TOSP technique, assessing improvements in pain and disability. Entry point in transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD) was taken as a rough distance of 10 to 12 cm from midline as proposed by Kambin whereas Yeung and Tsou advised entry point as distance between the center of the disc space and the posterior skin line measured on lateral. But entry points cannot be static as they tend to change according to changes in physical parameters.

Materials and Methods This study comprises of radiological analysis and a prospective evaluation of these patients operated on using the PL-TOSP entry point. Radiological analytic study was performed on 50 symptomatic preoperative patients who underwent transforaminal endoscopy using the novel PL-TOSP entry point. A lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) field of vision (MRI-FOV) was performed for the patients including the abdominal perimeter. Weight, height, and abdominal girth of the patients were noted prior to MRI. Angulation of trajectory made by four standard entry points used in TELD, namely, 45–45, PL, TOSP), dorsum of facet joint, and our proposed entry point PL-TOSP (which is a midpoint between PL and TOSP entry), were calculated using MRI-FOV at L45 and L5S1 level. For the functional outcome analysis of these 50 patients, preoperative Visual Analogue Score (VAS) for lower limb pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were recorded. Postoperative VAS and ODI scores were reassessed at 2, 6, and 12 weeks. Statistical analysis was conducted to evaluate the significance of changes in VAS scores and ODI preoperative versus postoperative. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results Angle of trajectory with the horizontal for all five entry points varies with physical parameters. PL-TOSP entry point has the least variation with change in physical parameters as compared with other entry points. The range of angle for PL-TOSP entry was 21 to 29 degrees. In our study, there was improvement in postoperative VAS and ODI scoring systems which was statistically significant (p-value < 0.05). This suggests reliability of our proposed entry point with consistent postoperative improvement.

Conclusion The novel PL-TOSP entry point for transforaminal endoscopy demonstrates superior stability in trajectory angle despite variations in physical parameters, and is associated with significant improvements in functional outcomes and pain reduction for patients with lower limb radiculopathy. Angulation of PL-TOSP trajectory with horizontal also corresponds to current generation of endoscopes (25 or 30 degrees).

Authors' Contributions

P.P. contributed to the concept and study design. K.D. was involved in the study design, manuscript writing, data analysis, and review of literature. S.K. took care of editing and proof reading, while V.G. managed data collection. Lastly, V.P. handled data analysis.




Publication History

Article published online:
30 July 2024

© 2024. Asian Congress of Neurological Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Yeung AT. The evolution and advancement of endoscopic foraminal surgery: one surgeon's experience incorporating adjunctive technologies. SAS J 2007; 1 (03) 108-117
  • 2 Kambin P, Savitz MH. Arthroscopic microdiscectomy: an alternative to open disc surgery. Mt Sinai J Med 2000; 67 (04) 283-287
  • 3 Yue JJ, Long W. Full endoscopic spinal surgery techniques: advancements, indications, and outcomes. Int J Spine Surg 2015; 9: 17
  • 4 Datar G, Shinde A, Bommakanti K. Technical consideration of transforaminal endoscopic spine surgery for central herniation. Indian J Pain 2017; 31 (02) 86
  • 5 Ahn Y. Transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: technical tips to prevent complications. Expert Rev Med Devices 2012; 9 (04) 361-366
  • 6 Ruetten S, Komp M, Godolias G. An extreme lateral access for the surgery of lumbar disc herniations inside the spinal canal using the full-endoscopic uniportal transforaminal approach-technique and prospective results of 463 patients. Spine 2005; 30 (22) 2570-2578
  • 7 Kambin P, O'Brien E, Zhou L, Schaffer JL. Arthroscopic microdiscectomy and selective fragmentectomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; (347) 150-167
  • 8 Lee JU, Park KJ, Kim KH, Choi MK, Lee YH, Kim DH. What is the ideal entry point for transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy?. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2020; 63 (05) 614-622
  • 9 Patgaonkar P, Goyal V, Agrawal U, Marathe N, Patel V. Impact of body weight, height, and obesity on selection of skin entry point for transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy. Asian J Neurosurg 2022; 17 (02) 262-267
  • 10 Hult L. Retroperitoneal disc fenestration in low-back pain and sciatica; a preliminary report. Acta Orthop Scand 1951; 20 (04) 342-348
  • 11 Hijikata S. Percutaneous nucleotomy. A new concept technique and 12 years' experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989; (238) 9-23
  • 12 Kambin P. Percutaneous lumbar discectomy (Triangular Working Zone). In: Current Practice Surgical Rounds in Orthopaedics. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate Hospital; Philadelphia, PA: 1988: 31-35
  • 13 Kambin P. Arthroscopic microdiscectomy. In: Mayer HM. ed. Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2000: 187-199
  • 14 Savitz MH. Same-day microsurgical arthroscopic lateral-approach laser-assisted (SMALL) fluoroscopic discectomy. J Neurosurg 1994; 80 (06) 1039-1045
  • 15 Kitagawa Y, Sairyo K, Shibuya I. et al. Minimally invasive and simultaneous removal of herniated intracanal and extracanal lumbar nucleus pulposus with a percutaneous spinal endoscope. Asian J Endosc Surg 2012; 5 (04) 183-186
  • 16 Lübbers T, Abuamona R, Elsharkawy AE. Percutaneous endoscopic treatment of foraminal and extraforaminal disc herniation at the L5-S1 level. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2012; 154 (10) 1789-1795
  • 17 Yeung AT. The evolution of percutaneous spinal endoscopy and discectomy: state of the art. Mt Sinai J Med 2000; 67 (04) 327-332
  • 18 Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, Godolias G. Use of newly developed instruments and endoscopes: full-endoscopic resection of lumbar disc herniations via the interlaminar and lateral transforaminal approach. J Neurosurg Spine 2007; 6 (06) 521-530
  • 19 Kambin P, Casey K, O'Brien E, Zhou L. Transforaminal arthroscopic decompression of lateral recess stenosis. J Neurosurg 1996; 84 (03) 462-467
  • 20 Yeung AT, Yeung CA. Advances in endoscopic disc and spine surgery: foraminal approach. Surg Technol Int 2003; 11: 255-263
  • 21 Lewandrowski KU. The strategies behind “inside-out” and “outside-in” endoscopy of the lumbar spine: treating the pain generator. J Spine Surg 2020; 6 (Suppl. 01) S35-S39
  • 22 Gore S, Yeung A. The “inside out” transforaminal technique to treat lumbar spinal pain in an awake and aware patient under local anesthesia: results and a review of the literature. Int J Spine Surg 2014; 8: 28
  • 23 Kim HS, Adsul N, Kapoor A. et al. A mobile outside-in technique of transforaminal lumbar endoscopy for lumbar disc herniations. J Vis Exp 2018; (138) 57999
  • 24 Yeung AT, Tsou PM. Posterolateral endoscopic excision for lumbar disc herniation: Surgical technique, outcome, and complications in 307 consecutive cases. Spine 2002; 27 (07) 722-731
  • 25 Knight MTN, Jago I, Norris C, Midwinter L, Boynes C. Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar decompression & foraminoplasty: a 10 year prospective survivability outcome study of the treatment of foraminal stenosis and failed back surgery. Int J Spine Surg 2014; 8: 21
  • 26 Nair VV, Kohli S, Vishwakarma N, Mhatre J. Outcome of transforaminal endoscopic discectomy in rural India in a single-level lumbar disc prolapse under local anesthesia. Asian J Neurosurg 2023; 18 (02) 312-320
  • 27 Wang SF, Hung SF, Tsai TT. et al. Better functional outcome and pain relief in the far-lateral-outside-in percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy. J Pain Res 2021; 14: 3927-3934