Analyzing Cell-free Genomic DNA in Spent Culture Media: Noninvasive Insight into the Blastocysts

Abstract

A commonly accepted standard protocol for noninvasive techniques for the genetic evaluation of an embryo remains elusive due to inconclusiveness regarding the volume of spent media to be acquired and the possibility of acquiring the same for subsequent analysis. Single embryo culture is imperative for standardizing noninvasive preimplantation testing using cell-free DNA (cf-DNA) released by individual developing embryos. This study aims to compare the development dynamics of single-drop embryonic culture against with group embryonic culture to establish a standardized protocol for noninvasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing (PGT) in bovine. A total of 239 cumulus–oocyte complexes were aspirated and subjected to in vitro maturation and fertilization. Among these, 120 embryos of day 3 were transferred to single-drop culture until the blastocyst stage. The single-drop culture drops were prepared using microdrops of 30 μL. At the blastocyst stage, spent media from all single-drop embryos were utilized for extracting cell-free genomic DNA to standardize the protocol. The blastocyst rate indicates no significant difference between the two culture methods, suggesting that single-drop culture is suitable for the process. Additionally, the extracted spent media yielded sufficient quantities of cf-DNA, supporting its potential use for PGT (p < 0.05). These findings support the hypothesis that single-drop embryo culture is a viable method for cf-DNA extraction and confirm the potential of using DNA fragments from spent media as a reliable source for noninvasive PGT.

Keywords

single embryo culture - cf-DNA - spent media - noninvasive PGT - blastocysts

Ethical Approval

Ethics approval was granted by the MGM Institutional Ethical Committee.

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
23. Juli 2024

• References

• 1 Szamatowicz M. Assisted reproductive technology in reproductive medicine - possibilities and limitations. Ginekol Pol 2016; 87 (12) 820-823
• 2 Fan HC, Quake SR. Detection of aneuploidy with digital polymerase chain reaction. Anal Chem 2007; 79 (19) 7576-7579
• 3 Huang B, Luo X, Wu R. et al. Evaluation of non-invasive gene detection in preimplantation embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet 2023; 40 (06) 1243-1253
• 4 Alizadegan A, Akbarzadeh M, Soltani-Zangbar MS. et al. Isolation of cfDNA from spent culture media and its association with implantation rate and maternal immunomodulation. BMC Res Notes 2022; 15 (01) 259
• 5 Lu L, Lv B, Huang K, Xue Z, Zhu X, Fan G. Recent advances in preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening. J Assist Reprod Genet 2016; 33 (09) 1129-1134
• 6 O'Doherty EM, Wade MG, Hill JL, Boland MP. Effects of culturing bovine oocytes either singly or in groups on development to blastocysts. Theriogenology 1997; 48 (01) 161-169
• 7 Bols PE, Goovaerts IG, Jorssen EP, Petro EM, Langbeen A, Leroy JL. New applications for bovine IVP technology: from 'single oocyte culture to toxicity screening. Anim Reprod (AR) 2018; 9 (03) 388-394
• 8 Čechová M, Andrlíková M. Boosting the potential of cattle breeding using molecular biology, genetics, and bioinformatics approaches–a review. Acta Veterinaria Brunensis. 2021; 90 (02) 145-154
• 9 Neculai-Valeanu AS, Ariton AM. Game-changing approaches in sperm sex-sorting: microfluidics and nanotechnology. Animals (Basel) 2021; 11 (04) 1182
• 10 Butkiewicz AF, Amaral A, Cerveira-Pinto M, Kordowitzki P. Assessing the influence of maternal age in bovine embryos and oocytes: a model for human reproductive aging. Aging Dis 2024; 16 (02) 2
• 11 Khare V, Khare A. Modern approach in animal breeding by use of advanced molecular genetic techniques. Int J Livest Res 2017;7(01):
• 12 Das DN, Paul D, Mondal S. Role of biotechnology on animal breeding and genetic improvement. In: Emerging Issues in Climate Smart Livestock Production. Academic Press;; 2022: 317-337
• 13 Bharti AV, Layek SS, Raj S, Gorani S, Doultani S. 41 Vitrification of bovine in vitro-produced embryos: can it replace slow freezing in bovines?. Reprod Fertil Dev 2022; 35 (02) 146-146
• 14 Doultani S, Layek SS, Karuppanasamy K, Raj S, Gorani S, Patil SP. 118 Replacing ovum pickup media for in vitro embryo production in cattle: quest to reduce the cost of production of embryos. Reprod Fertil Dev 2022; 35 (02) 186-186
• 15 Patil SP, Hadiya KK, Layek SS. et al. Ovum pick-up and in vitro embryo production from stimulated vs non-stimulated buffaloes. Indian J Vet Sci Biotechnol 2022; 18 (01) 95-100
• 16 Layek SS, Gorani S, Karuppanasamy K. et al. 14 Production and transfer of bovine embryos through the hub-and-spoke model: an innovative model to promote embryo transfer technology. Reprod Fertil Dev 2023; 36 (02) 156-156
• 17 Reed ML, Woodward BJ, Swain JE. Single or group culture of mammalian embryos: the verdict of the literature. J Reprod Stem Cell Biotechnol 2011; 2 (02) 77-87
• 18 Rubio C, Rienzi L, Navarro-Sánchez L. et al. Embryonic cell-free DNA versus trophectoderm biopsy for aneuploidy testing: concordance rate and clinical implications. Fertil Steril 2019; 112 (03) 510-519
• 19 Shitara A, Takahashi K, Goto M. et al. Cell-free DNA in spent culture medium effectively reflects the chromosomal status of embryos following culturing beyond implantation compared to trophectoderm biopsy. PLoS ONE 2021; 16 (02) e0246438
• 20 Brouillet S, Martinez G, Coutton C, Hamamah S. Is cell-free DNA in spent embryo culture medium an alternative to embryo biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing? A systematic review. Reprod Biomed Online 2020; 40 (06) 779-796
• 21 Bojko B, Pawliszyn J. In vivo and ex vivo SPME: a low invasive sampling and sample preparation tool in clinical bioanalysis. Bioanalysis 2014; 6 (09) 1227-1239
• 22 Ferreira CM, Sabino-Marques H, Barbosa S. et al. Genetic non-invasive sampling (gNIS) as a cost-effective tool for monitoring elusive small mammals. Eur J Wildl Res 2018; 64: 1-15
• 23 Dupras C, Birko S, Affdal A, Haidar H, Lemoine ME, Ravitsky V. Benefits, challenges and ethical principles associated with implementing noninvasive prenatal testing: a Delphi study. CMAJ Open 2018; 6 (04) E513-E519
• 24 Soto DA, Ross PJ. Similarities between bovine and human germline development revealed by single-cell RNA sequencing. Reproduction 2021; 161 (03) 239-253
• 25 Huang J, Yao Y, Zhou Y. et al. Non-invasive chromosome screening for embryo preimplantation using cell-free DNA. In: Infertility and Assisted Reproduction;. 2021: 83
• 26 He F, Yao YX, Wang J. et al. Non-invasive chromosome screening for embryo preimplantation using cell-free DNA. Reprod Dev Med 2022; 6 (02) 113-120
• 27 Hahn S, Hösli I, Lapaire O. Non-invasive prenatal diagnostics using next generation sequencing: technical, legal and social challenges. Expert Opin Med Diagn 2012; 6 (06) 517-528
• 28 Kotsopoulou I, Tsoplou P, Mavrommatis K, Kroupis C. Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): limitations on the way to become diagnosis. Diagnosis (Berl) 2015; 2 (03) 141-158
• 29 Morisi N, Virzì GM, Ferrarini M. et al. Exploring the role of cell-free nucleic acids and peritoneal dialysis: a narrative review. Genes (Basel) 2024; 15 (05) 553