Minimal Access Retromandibular Approach to Fractures of Vertical Segment of the Mandible: A Versatile Technique

Abstract

Introduction Fractures of the condylar region of the mandible, although fairly common, also generate the most debate regarding management—both closed and open treatment options have been recommended and shown to yield good results. We present our experience with a minimal access retromandibular approach to fractures of the vertical mandible.

Materials and Methods This is a retrospective study of all patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation for fractures of the vertical mandible (condyle, subcondylar region, ramus) using a retromandibular approach at a tertiary care hospital in a metropolitan city in India between January 2022 and July 2023. All fractures were approached using a standard technique through a retromandibular incision and a transparotid route. The proximal segment was mobilized, reduced, and fixed to the ramus with two 2-mm miniplates—one along the posterior border and the other along the sigmoid notch border. Postoperative guiding elastics were placed for 2 weeks without any rigid maxillomandibular fixation. Patients were followed at weekly intervals for 1 month followed by monthly visits for 6 months. At each visit, mouth opening, occlusion, and facial nerve function were assessed. Scar quality was assessed by both examiner and patient using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) scoring system.

Results A total of 25 subcondylar fractures in 20 patients were fixed using the retromandibular approach. Nineteen were male and 1 was female. The etiology of trauma was road accident (8), fall from train (2), fall from height (5) and assault (5). Fifteen patients had unilateral fractures while 5 had bilateral fractures. All patients had concomitant fractures of the mandibular arch which were also fixed. The interval between trauma and surgery ranged from 5 to 28 days. All patients had premature molar contact on the side of fracture with anterior open bite. Mouth opening ranged from 1.5 to 2.5 cm. All the fractures could be fixed using the retromandibular approach. None of the patients developed any facial nerve dysfunction or salivary leak. The occlusion was restored to pretrauma status in all patients and was stable at 6 months' follow-up. Mouth opening ranged from 3.5 to 4 cm. The POSAS observer score ranged from 09 to 19 with a mean score of 12.7. The POSAS patient score ranged from 17 to 28 with a mean score of 20.3 revealing that all patients were extremely happy with the scar.

Conclusion The minimal access retromandibular approach to the vertical mandible is a versatile technique enabling accurate reduction and fixation of fractures of the vertical segment of the mandible with good long-term functional and cosmetic results.

Keywords

retromandibular - condylar - condyle fracture - open bite

Publication History

Article published online:
12 June 2024

• References

• 1 Halazonetis JA. The ‘weak’ regions of the mandible. Br J Oral Surg 1968; 6 (01) 37-48
• 2 Odaka K, Matsunaga S. Course of the maxillary vein and its positional relationship with the mandibular ramus require attention during mandibuloplasty. J Craniofac Surg 2020; 31 (03) 861-864
• 3 Orbay H, Kerem M, Ünlü RE, Cömert A, Tüccar E, Şensöz Ö. Maxillary artery: anatomical landmarks and relationship with the mandibular subcondyle. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (07) 1865-1870
• 4 Ellis E. Indications for open reduction and closed reduction treatment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004; 62: 12-13
• 5 Ellis III E, Simon P, Throckmorton GS. Occlusal results after open or closed treatment of fractures of the mandibular condylar process. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000; 58 (03) 260-268
• 6 Eckelt U, Schneider M, Erasmus F. et al. Open versus closed treatment of fractures of the mandibular condylar process-a prospective randomized multi-centre study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2006; 34 (05) 306-314
• 7 van de Kar AL, Corion LUM, Smeulders MJC, Draaijers LJ, van der Horst CM, van Zuijlen PP. Reliable and feasible evaluation of linear scars by the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 116 (02) 514-522
• 8 Lindahl L. Condylar fractures of the mandible. I. Classification and relation to age, occlusion, and concomitant injuries of teeth and teeth-supporting structures, and fractures of the mandibular body. Int J Oral Surg 1977; 6 (01) 12-21
• 9 Barde D, Mudhol A, Madan R. Prevalence and pattern of mandibular fracture in Central India. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 2014; 5 (02) 153-156
• 10 Ellis III E, Dean J. Rigid fixation of mandibular condyle fractures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993; 76 (01) 6-15
• 11 Yabe T, Tsuda T, Hirose S, Ozawa T. Preauricular transparotid approach to mandibular condylar fractures without dissecting facial nerves. J Craniofac Surg 2013; 24 (04) 1365-1367
• 12 Alagarsamy R, Lal B, Arangaraju R. et al. Nonendoscopic intraoral approach for condylar fracture management-a systematic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2023; 135 (05) 596-613
• 13 Wilde F. Intraoral endoscopic approach for treatment of condylar fractures of the mandible. In: Bonanthaya K, Panneerselvam E, Manuel S, Kumar VV, Rai A. eds. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery for the Clinician. Singapore: Springer; 2021
• 14 Schön R, Gutwald R, Schramm A, Gellrich NC, Schmelzeisen R. Endoscopy-assisted open treatment of condylar fractures of the mandible: extraoral vs intraoral approach. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002; 31 (03) 237-243
• 15 Nam SM, Lee JH, Kim JH. The application of the Risdon approach for mandibular condyle fractures. BMC Surg 2013; 13: 25
• 16 Narayanan V, Ramadorai A, Ravi P, Nirvikalpa N. Transmasseteric anterior parotid approach for condylar fractures: experience of 129 cases. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 50 (05) 420-424
• 17 Hinds EC, Girotti WJ. Vertical subcondylar osteotomy: a reappraisal. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1967; 24 (02) 164-170
• 18 Sikora M, Olszowski T, Sielski M, Stąpor A, Janiszewska-Olszowska J, Chlubek D. The use of the transparotid approach for surgical treatment of condylar fractures - own experience. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2015; 43 (10) 1961-1965
• 19 Yang L, Patil PM. The retromandibular transparotid approach to mandibular subcondylar fractures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012; 41 (04) 494-499
• 20 Ellis III E, McFadden D, Simon P, Throckmorton G. Surgical complications with open treatment of mandibular condylar process fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000; 58 (09) 950-958
• 21 Bouchard C, Perreault MH. Postoperative complications associated with the retromandibular approach: a retrospective analysis of 118 subcondylar fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014; 72 (02) 370-375
• 22 Choi BH, Kim KN, Kim HJ, Kim MK. Evaluation of condylar neck fracture plating techniques. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1999; 27 (02) 109-112
• 23 Tominaga K, Habu M, Khanal A, Mimori Y, Yoshioka I, Fukuda J. Biomechanical evaluation of different types of rigid internal fixation techniques for subcondylar fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 64 (10) 1510-1516
• 24 Asprino L, Consani S, de Moraes M. A comparative biomechanical evaluation of mandibular condyle fracture plating techniques. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 64 (03) 452-456
• 25 Boyne PJ. Free grafting of traumatically displaced or resected mandibular condyles. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1989; 47 (03) 228-232
• 26 Hammond D, Arafat A, Bainton R. Revisiting the Boyne procedure. Med J Armed Forces India 2012; 68 (01) 39-41
• 27 Park SY, Im JH, Yoon SH, Lee DK. A follow-up study on extracorporeal fixation of condylar fractures using vertical ramus osteotomy. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014; 40 (02) 76-82
• 28 Gupta MV, Sahoo NK. Extracorporeal fixation of displaced mandibular condylar fracture: viable option. Med J Armed Forces India 2009; 65 (03) 229-231