RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1787177
Versatility of the Keystone Design Perforator Island Flaps in Resurfacing Soft Tissue Defects

Abstract
Background The keystone design perforator island flap (KDPIF) is unique among local flaps because of its high potential for adaptation. We describe our experience with the use of the keystone flap for the reconstruction of a variety of defects in different regions of the body concerning its versatility, surgical outcomes, complications, postoperative pain, operative time, and esthetic outcomes.
Methods A prospective observational study was conducted at our institute from June 2021 to June 2023 where the use of KDPIFs in resurfacing soft tissue defects of different etiopathogenesis was evaluated and the data were analyzed.
Results Forty-four patients were included in the study with soft tissue defects of various etiologies and at different locations. The largest flap raised was 18 × 10 cm and the smallest was 4 × 2 cm. The average intraoperative time for completion of the procedure was 74.86 minutes (range: 45–120 minutes). The success rate of flap survivability was 95.45% with two patients having total flap loss necessitating another reconstructive option. Partial flap dehiscence which healed secondarily was observed in two patients. Postoperative pain showed a significant fall of 83.7% from baseline and 82.9% of cases were extremely satisfied with the esthetic outcome.
Conclusion The keystone flap is a valuable reconstructive tool in the armamentarium of a plastic surgeon. It is technically reproducible, suitable to be done in resource-limited settings, and provides contiguous tissue with good vascularity and fewer complications.
Ethical Approval
The article has been prepared in compliance with the ethical standards of our institution and has been approved by the institutional ethics committee. Informed consent was taken from all the patients for participation in the study.
Publikationsverlauf
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
06. Juni 2024
© 2024. Association of Plastic Surgeons of India. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Behan FC. The keystone design perforator island flap in reconstructive surgery. ANZ J Surg 2003; 73 (03) 112-120
- 2 Yoon CS, Kong YT, Lim SY, Kim J, Shin HW, Kim KN. A comparative study for tension-reducing effect of Type I and Type II keystone perforator island flap in the human back. Sci Rep 2021; 11 (01) 16699
- 3 Mohan AT, Rammos CK, Akhavan AA. et al. Evolving concepts of keystone perforator island flaps (KPIF): principles of perforator anatomy, design modifications, and extended clinical applications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (06) 1909-1920
- 4 Riccio CA, Chang J, Henderson JT. et al. Keystone flaps: physiology, types, and clinical applications. Ann Plast Surg 2019; 83 (02) 226-231
- 5 Donovan LC, Douglas CD, Van Helden D. Wound tension and ‘closability’ with keystone flaps, V-Y flaps and primary closure: a study in fresh-frozen cadavers. ANZ J Surg 2018; 88 (05) 486-490
- 6 Johnson C. Measuring pain. visual analog scale versus numeric pain scale: what is the difference?. J Chiropr Med 2005; 4 (01) 43-44
- 7 Joshi A, Kale S, Chandel S, Pal D. Likert scale: explored and explained. Br J Appl Sci Technol 2015; 7 (04) 396-403
- 8 Gupta S, Sharma A, Srivastava S. A keystone flap as a reconstructive option for selected areas: a prospective study. J Aesthet Reconstr Surg 2020; 6 (02) 6
- 9 Pelissier P, Santoul M, Pinsolle V, Casoli V, Behan F. The keystone design perforator island flap. Part I: anatomic study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2007; 60 (08) 883-887
- 10 Behan FC. The fasciocutaneous island flap: an extension of the angiotome concept. Aust N Z J Surg 1992; 62 (11) 874-886
- 11 Lo CH, Nottle T, Mills J. Keystone island flap: effects of islanding on vascularity. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2016; 4 (02) e617
- 12 Behan FC, Lo CH, Sizeland A. The interpretation of vascular changes observed in keystone island flaps: a hypothesis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63 (02) e215-e216
- 13 Pelissier P, Gardet H, Pinsolle V, Santoul M, Behan FC. The keystone design perforator island flap. Part II: clinical applications. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2007; 60 (08) 888-891
- 14 Yoo BW, Oh KS, Kim J, Shin HW, Kim KN. Modified keystone perforator island flap techniques for small- to moderate-sized scalp and forehead defect coverage: a retrospective observational study. J Pers Med 2023; 13 (02) 329
- 15 Pripotnev S, White C. The keystone flap—a case series demonstrating practical design, use, and applications. Plast Surg (Oakv) 2017; 25 (03) 184-187
- 16 Bhat SP. Keystone flaps in coloured skin: flap technology for the masses?. Indian J Plast Surg 2013; 46 (01) 36-47
- 17 Lanni MA, Van Kouwenberg E, Yan A, Rezak KM, Patel A. Applying the keystone design perforator island flap concept in a variety of anatomic locations a review of 60 consecutive cases by a single surgeon. Ann Plast Surg 2017; 79 (01) 60-67
- 18 Gómez OJ, Barón OI, Peñarredonda ML. Keystone flap: overcoming paradigms. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2019; 7 (03) e2126
- 19 Lo Torto F, Frattaroli JM, Kaciulyte J. et al. The keystone flap: a multi-centric experience in elderly patients treatment. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2022; 75 (01) 226-239
- 20 Behan F, Findlay M, Lo CH. The Keystone Perforator Island Flap Concept. Australia:: Churchill Livingstone;; 2012