RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1787140
Quality Assessment of Colonoscopies Performed by Resident Physicians in Colorectal Surgery
Autoren
Abstract
Introduction Colorectal cancer is the third most common malignant neoplasm worldwide, with ∼ 150 thousand new cases each year. Screening policies have brought significant progress due to the possibility of early diagnosis and polyp resection. Therefore, there is a need for continuous evaluation of the quality of colonoscopies based on well-established criteria in the literature.
Materials and Methods The present retrospective study assesses the quality of colonoscopies performed at a tertiary hospital, comparing resident physicians with their preceptors. A total of 422 preceptor exams and 115 resident exams were evaluated, with a comparison of the adenoma detection rate, cecal intubation rate, examination time, and bowel preparation quality.
Results The adenoma detection rate in the exams performed by preceptors was of 46.9%, while in those performed by residents, it was of 35.2% (p = 0.038). The cecal intubation rate was of 98.6% in the preceptor group and of 94.8% in the resident group (p = 0.025). The median total examination time was of 13 minutes and 42 seconds in the preceptor group and of 19 minutes and 22 seconds in the resident group (p < 0.005).
Conclusion During their training, resident physicians perform an adequate number of colonoscopies, which enables them to achieve adenoma detection rates, cecal intubation and examination times within the limits proposed by the literature.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 21. Januar 2024
Angenommen: 09. April 2024
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
06. Juni 2024
© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
-
References
- 1 Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin 2023; 73 (01) 17-48
- 2 Ministério da Saúde Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva Ministério da Saúde Instituto Nacional de Câncer. 2023
- 3 Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J. et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81 (01) 31-53
- 4 Ladabaum U, Dominitz JA, Kahi C, Schoen RE. Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening. Gastroenterology 2020; 158 (02) 418-432
- 5 Shine R, Bui A, Burgess A. Quality indicators in colonoscopy: an evolving paradigm. ANZ J Surg 2020; 90 (03) 215-221
- 6 Rees CJ, Rajasekhar PT, Rutter MD, Dekker E. Quality in colonoscopy: European perspectives and practice. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 8 (01) 29-47
- 7 Rex DK, Bond JH, Winawer S. et al; U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97 (06) 1296-1308 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12094842/ cited 2023Jun3 [Internet]
- 8 Gurudu SR, Ramirez FC. Quality metrics in endoscopy. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y) 2013; 9 (04) 228-233
- 9 Calderwood AH, Schroy III PC, Lieberman DA, Logan JR, Zurfluh M, Jacobson BC. Boston Bowel Preparation Scale scores provide a standardized definition of adequate for describing bowel cleanliness. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 80 (02) 269-276
- 10 Brunner KT, Calderwood AH. Quality in Colonoscopy.
- 11 Bernstein C, Thorn M, Monsees K, Spell R, O'Connor JB. A prospective study of factors that determine cecal intubation time at colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61 (01) 72-75 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15672059/ cited 2023Jun7 [Internet]
- 12 Kaminski MF, Wieszczy P, Rupinski M. et al. Increased Rate of Adenoma Detection Associates With Reduced Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Death. Gastroenterology 2017; 153 (01) 98-105 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28428142/ cited 2023Jun7 [Internet]
- 13 May FP, Shaukat A. State of the Science on Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy and How to Achieve Them. Am J Gastroenterol 2020; 115 (08) 1183-1190
- 14 Bretthauer M, Løberg M, Wieszczy P. et al; NordICC Study Group. Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death. N Engl J Med 2022; 387 (17) 1547-1556 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36214590/ cited 2023Jun7 [Internet]
- 15 Wells C. The characteristics of an excellent endoscopy trainer. Frontline Gastroenterol 2010; 1 (01) 13-18
- 16 Sedlack RE. Training to competency in colonoscopy: assessing and defining competency standards. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74 (02) 355-366.e1, 2 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21514931/ cited 2023Jun7 [Internet]
- 17 Vennes JA, Ament M, Boyce J. et al; American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Principles of training in gastrointestinal endoscopy. From the ASGE. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 49 (06) 845-853 http://www.giejournal.org/article/S0016510799703160/fulltext cited 2023Jun7 [Internet]
- 18 Millien VO, Mansour NM. Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy in 2020: A Look at the Past, Present, and Future. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2020; 22 (06) 28
- 19 Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ, Burnand B, Vader JP. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. [Internet] Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61 (03) 378-384 www.mosby.com/gie
- 20 Rex DK, Imperiale TF, Latinovich DR, Bratcher LL. Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97 (07) 1696-1700
- 21 Muslim OT, Al-Obaidi HO. Cecal and ilial intubation rates in colonoscopy: Comparative study. J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol 2021; 28 (02) e1-e6
- 22 Shaukat A, Rector TS, Church TR. et al. Longer Withdrawal Time Is Associated With a Reduced Incidence of Interval Cancer After Screening Colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 2015; 149 (04) 952-957
- 23 Coe SG, Crook JE, Diehl NN, Wallace MB. An endoscopic quality improvement program improves detection of colorectal adenomas. Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108 (02) 219-226, quiz 227 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23295274/ cited 2023Oct10 [Internet]
- 24 Millan MS, Gross P, Manilich E, Church JM. Adenoma detection rate: the real indicator of quality in colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51 (08) 1217-1220 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18500502/ cited 2023Oct6 [Internet]
- 25 Whitlock EP, Lin JS, Liles E, Beil TL, Fu R. Screening for colorectal cancer: a targeted, updated systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2008; 149 (09) 638-658 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18838718/ cited 2023Jun7 [Internet]
