Practical Considerations in Computerized Surgical Planning for Frontofacial Surgery

Abstract

The field of frontofacial surgery has advanced considerably, building on the pioneering techniques of Paul Tessier, with computerized surgical planning (CSP) emerging as a critical component. CSP has enhanced the precision and efficiency of surgeries for craniofacial dysostoses and hypertelorism, resulting in improved outcomes. This review delves into the importance of understanding orbital anatomy and the crucial bony and soft tissue landmarks essential to the application of CSP in frontofacial procedures, encompassing Le Fort III and monobloc advancements, as well as the correction of hypertelorism.

Keywords

computerized surgical planning - frontofacial surgery - craniofacial surgery - craniofacial dysostoses - hypertelorism

Ethical Approval

This review was also approved by the Institutional Review Board at Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist (IRB00052044).

Patient Consent

All participants in this study provided written informed consent to accessing their photographs, imaging, or other identifying characteristics in this review. This review was also approved by the Institutional Review Board at Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist (IRB00052044).

Publication History

Article published online:
23 May 2024

• References

• 1 Tessier P. Orbital hypertelorism. I. Successive surgical attempts. Material and methods. Causes and mechanisms. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1972; 6 (02) 135-155
• 2 Tessier P. [Total facial osteotomy. Crouzon's syndrome, Apert's syndrome: oxycephaly, scaphocephaly, turricephaly]. Ann Chir Plast 1967; 12 (04) 273-286
• 3 Tessier P. Anatomical classification facial, cranio-facial and latero-facial clefts. J Maxillofac Surg 1976; 4 (02) 69-92
• 4 Tessier P. [Surgical treatment of genetically caused eyelid and orbito-facial deformities]. Buch Augenarzt 1968; 50: 82-121
• 5 Tessier P. The definitive plastic surgical treatment of the severe facial deformities of craniofacial dysostosis. Crouzon's and Apert's diseases. Plast Reconstr Surg 1971; 48 (05) 419-442
• 6 Klement KA, Havlik RJ. Fundamental principles. In: Mesa J, Buchman S, Mackay DR, Losee JE, Havlik RJ. eds. Atlas of Operative Craniofacial Surgery. Thieme; 2019: 3-12
• 7 Forrest CR, Hopper RA. Craniofacial syndromes and surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131 (01) 86e-109e
• 8 Wieczorek D. Human facial dysostoses. Clin Genet 2013; 83 (06) 499-510
• 9 Runyan CM, Xu M D W, Alperovich M. et al. Minor suture fusion in syndromic craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 140 (03) 434e-445e
• 10 Katzen JT, McCarthy JG. Syndromes involving craniosynostosis and midface hypoplasia. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2000; 33 (06) 1257-1284 , vi
• 11 Wieland I, Jakubiczka S, Muschke P. et al. Mutations of the ephrin-B1 gene cause craniofrontonasal syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 2004; 74 (06) 1209-1215
• 12 Mahapatra AK, Agrawal D. Anterior encephaloceles: a series of 103 cases over 32 years. J Clin Neurosci 2006; 13 (05) 536-539
• 13 Winters R. Tessier clefts and hypertelorism. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2016; 24 (04) 545-558
• 14 David LR, Fisher D, Argenta L. New technique for reconstructing the affected cranium and orbital rim in unicoronal craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg 2009; 20 (01) 194-197
• 15 Touzé R, Paternoster G, Arnaud E. et al. Ophthalmological findings in children with unicoronal craniosynostosis. Eur J Ophthalmol 2022; 32 (06) 3274-3280
• 16 Brandstetter KA, Patel KG. Craniofacial microsomia. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2016; 24 (04) 495-515
• 17 Sakamoto Y, Tamada I, Sakamoto T, Ishii T, Kishi K. Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis without bicoronal incision. J Craniofac Surg 2020; 31 (06) 1753-1755
• 18 Gwanmesia I, Mlynek K, Papay FA, Doumit GD. Orbital box osteotomy for orbital dystopia. In: Mesa J, Buchman S, Mackay DR, Losee JE, Havlik RJ. eds. Atlas of Operative Craniofacial Surgery. Thieme; 2019: 99-108
• 19 Lopez CD, Kumar A, Lin AY. et al. Demystifying the “triple point: ” technical nuances of the fronto-orbital advancement. J Craniofac Surg 2018; 29 (03) 796-799
• 20 Hester KM, Rahimi OB, Fry CL, Nation HL. A cadaveric study investigating the anatomy of the medial orbital wall. Anat Cell Biol 2021; 54 (03) 297-303
• 21 Mulliken JB, Godwin SL, Pracharktam N, Altobelli DE. The concept of the sagittal orbital-globe relationship in craniofacial surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 97 (04) 700-706
• 22 Caprioglio A, Panzi S, Fastuca R. et al. Cephalometric evaluation of ocular protrusion at stages of growth. J Craniofac Surg 2014; 25 (03) 818-821
• 23 Resnick CM, Salcines A, Hughes CD, Padwa BL, Mulliken JB. Retroposition of the globe after Le Fort III midfacial distraction. J Craniofac Surg 2019; 30 (02) 358-362
• 24 Ko EW, Chen PK, Tai IC, Huang CS. Fronto-facial monobloc distraction in syndromic craniosynostosis. Three-dimensional evaluation of treatment outcome and facial growth. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012; 41 (01) 20-27
• 25 Layton RG, Pontier JF, Bins GP, Sucher BJ, Runyan CM. Morphology of the occipital bones and foramen magnum resulting from premature minor suture fusion in crouzon syndrome. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2023; 60 (05) 591-600
• 26 McCarthy JG, Flores RL. Distraction of the midface: Le Fort III and monobloc. In: McCarthy JG. ed. Craniofacial Distraction. Springer; 2017: 135-176
• 27 Tunçbilek G. Le Fort III osteotomy with external distraction. In: Chung KC. ed. Operative Techniques in Plastic Surgery. First edition. ed.. Wolters Kluwer; 2020: 621-633
• 28 Patel P, Mesa J. LeFort III osteotomy. In: Mesa J, Buchman S, Mackay DR, Losee JE, Havlik RJ. eds. Atlas of Operative Craniofacial Surgery. Thieme; 2019: 257-268
• 29 Vu DD, Tiwana PS. Le Fort III and Le Fort II osteotomies. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2016; 24 (01) 15-25
• 30 Saettele M, Alexander A, Markovich B, Morelli J, Lowe LH. Congenital midline nasofrontal masses. Pediatr Radiol 2012; 42 (09) 1119-1125
• 31 Jensen JN, McCarthy JG, Grayson BH, Nusbaum AO, Eski M. Bone deposition/generation with LeFort III (midface) distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (01) 298-307
• 32 Cruz AA, Akaishi PM, Arnaud E, Marchac D, Renier D. Palpebral fissure changes after monobloc frontofacial advancement in faciocraniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg 2008; 19 (01) 106-109
• 33 Escaravage Jr GK, Dutton JJ. Age-related changes in the pediatric human orbit on CT. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 29 (03) 150-156
• 34 Hammoudeh JA, Goel P, Wolfswinkel EM. et al. Simultaneous midface advancement and orthognathic surgery: a powerful technique for managing midface hypoplasia and malocclusion. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 145 (06) 1067e-1072e
• 35 Shetye PR, Giannoutsos E, Grayson BH, McCarthy JG. Le Fort III distraction: part I. Controlling position and vectors of the midface segment. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (03) 871-878
• 36 Figueroa AA, Polley JW, Figueroa AD. Biomechanical considerations for distraction of the monobloc, Le Fort III, and Le Fort I segments. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (03) 1005-1013
• 37 Francis C, Rommer E, Mancho S, Carey J, Hammoudeh JA, Urata MM. Vector control in internal midface distraction using temporary anchorage devices. J Craniofac Surg 2012; 23 (7, Suppl 1) 2000-2003
• 38 Ortiz-Monasterio F, del Campo AF, Carrillo A. Advancement of the orbits and the midface in one piece, combined with frontal repositioning, for the correction of Crouzon's deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 1978; 61 (04) 507-516
• 39 Polley JW, Figueroa AA, Girotto JA, Dietze-Fiedler ML. Monobloc differential distraction osteogenesis. J Craniofac Surg 2022; 33 (01) 270-275
• 40 Arnaud E, Marchac D, Renier D. Reduction of morbidity of the frontofacial monobloc advancement in children by the use of internal distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (04) 1009-1026
• 41 Shin JH, Duncan CC, Persing J. Monobloc distraction: technical modification and considerations. J Craniofac Surg 2003; 14 (05) 763-766
• 42 Bradley JP, Gabbay JS, Taub PJ. et al. Monobloc advancement by distraction osteogenesis decreases morbidity and relapse. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118 (07) 1585-1597
• 43 Morice A, Paternoster G, Ostertag A. et al. Anterior skull base and pericranial flap ossification after frontofacial monobloc advancement. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141 (02) 437-445
• 44 Hopper RA, Prucz RB, Iamphongsai S. Achieving differential facial changes with Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis: the use of nasal passenger grafts, cerclage hinges, and segmental movements. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (06) 1281-1288
• 45 Paliga JT, Goldstein JA, Storm PB, Taylor JA. Monobloc minus Le Fort II for single-stage treatment of the Apert phenotype. J Craniofac Surg 2013; 24 (04) 1380-1382
• 46 Caterson EJ, Shetye PR, Grayson BH, McCarthy JG. Surgical management of patients with a history of early Le Fort III advancement after they have attained skeletal maturity. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132 (04) 592e-601e
• 47 Hopper RA, Kapadia H, Morton T. Normalizing facial ratios in apert syndrome patients with Le Fort II midface distraction and simultaneous zygomatic repositioning. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132 (01) 129-140
• 48 Hopper RA, Kapadia H, Susarla SM. Le Fort II distraction with zygomatic repositioning: a technique for differential correction of midface hypoplasia. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018; 76 (09) 2002.e1-2002.e14
• 49 Hopper RA, Wang HD, Mercan E. Le Fort II distraction with simultaneous zygomatic repositioning. Clin Plast Surg 2021; 48 (03) 487-496
• 50 Massenburg BB, Susarla SM, Kapadia HP, Hopper RA. Subcranial midface advancement in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2022; 34 (03) 467-475
• 51 Kreiborg S, Cohen Jr MM. The infant Apert skull. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1991; 2 (03) 551-554
• 52 Ching JA, Forrest CR. Facial bipartition. In: Chung KC. ed. Operative Techniques in Plastic Surgery. First edition. ed.. Wolters Kluwer; 2020: 542-554
• 53 Hansman CF. Growth of interorbital distance and skull thickness as observed in roentgenographic measurements. Radiology 1966; 86 (01) 87-96
• 54 Jullabussapa N, Khwanngern K, Pateekhum C, Angkurawaranon C, Angkurawaranon S. CT-based measurements of facial parameters of healthy children and adolescents in Thailand. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2020; 41 (10) 1937-1942
• 55 Greig AVH, Dunaway DJ. Facial bipartition distraction. In: McCarthy JG. ed. Craniofacial Distraction. Springer; 2017: 177-190
• 56 van der Meulen JC. Medial faciotomy. Br J Plast Surg 1979; 32 (04) 339-342
• 57 Tessier P, Tulasne JF. Stability in correction of hypertelorbitism and Treacher Collins syndromes. Clin Plast Surg 1989; 16 (01) 195-204
• 58 Ortiz Monasterio F, Medina O, Musolas A. Geometrical planning for the correction of orbital hypertelorism. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990; 86 (04) 650-657
• 59 Schlund M, Paré A, Joly A, Laure B. Computer-assisted surgery in facial bipartition surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018; 76 (05) 1094.e1-1094.e7
• 60 Marchac D, Sati S, Renier D, Deschamps-Braly J, Marchac A. Hypertelorism correction: what happens with growth? Evaluation of a series of 95 surgical cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129 (03) 713-727
• 61 Tholpady S, Havlik RJ, Eppley BL. Box and u-shaped osteotomies. In: Chung KC. ed. Operative Techniques in Plastic Surgery. First edition. ed.. Wolters Kluwer; 2020: 536-541
• 62 Laure B, Batut C, Benouhagrem A. et al. Addressing hypertelorism: Indications and techniques. Neurochirurgie 2019; 65 (05) 286-294
• 63 Breakey W, Abela C, Evans R. et al. Hypertelorism correction with facial bipartition and box osteotomy: does soft tissue translation correlate with bony movement?. J Craniofac Surg 2015; 26 (01) 196-200
• 64 Vuillemin T, Raveh J. Subcranial approach for the correction of hypertelorism. J Craniofac Surg 1990; 1 (02) 91-96
• 65 Velarde K, Cafino R, Isla Jr A. et al. Virtual surgical planning in craniomaxillofacial surgery: a structured review. Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon) 2023; 28 (01) 2271160