PDF herunterladen
Semin Plast Surg 2024; 38(03): 224-233
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1786802
Review Article

Practical Considerations in Computerized Surgical Planning for Frontofacial Surgery

Mario S. Blondin
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
,
Blake Dunson
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
,
Christopher M. Runyan
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
› Institutsangaben Funding None.
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

The field of frontofacial surgery has advanced considerably, building on the pioneering techniques of Paul Tessier, with computerized surgical planning (CSP) emerging as a critical component. CSP has enhanced the precision and efficiency of surgeries for craniofacial dysostoses and hypertelorism, resulting in improved outcomes. This review delves into the importance of understanding orbital anatomy and the crucial bony and soft tissue landmarks essential to the application of CSP in frontofacial procedures, encompassing Le Fort III and monobloc advancements, as well as the correction of hypertelorism.

Keywords

computerized surgical planning - frontofacial surgery - craniofacial surgery - craniofacial dysostoses - hypertelorism

Ethical Approval

This review was also approved by the Institutional Review Board at Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist (IRB00052044).


Patient Consent

All participants in this study provided written informed consent to accessing their photographs, imaging, or other identifying characteristics in this review. This review was also approved by the Institutional Review Board at Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist (IRB00052044).




Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
23. Mai 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Tessier P. Orbital hypertelorism. I. Successive surgical attempts. Material and methods. Causes and mechanisms. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1972; 6 (02) 135-155
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Tessier P. [Total facial osteotomy. Crouzon's syndrome, Apert's syndrome: oxycephaly, scaphocephaly, turricephaly]. Ann Chir Plast 1967; 12 (04) 273-286
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Tessier P. Anatomical classification facial, cranio-facial and latero-facial clefts. J Maxillofac Surg 1976; 4 (02) 69-92
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Tessier P. [Surgical treatment of genetically caused eyelid and orbito-facial deformities]. Buch Augenarzt 1968; 50: 82-121
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Tessier P. The definitive plastic surgical treatment of the severe facial deformities of craniofacial dysostosis. Crouzon's and Apert's diseases. Plast Reconstr Surg 1971; 48 (05) 419-442
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Klement KA, Havlik RJ. Fundamental principles. In: Mesa J, Buchman S, Mackay DR, Losee JE, Havlik RJ. eds. Atlas of Operative Craniofacial Surgery. Thieme; 2019: 3-12
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Forrest CR, Hopper RA. Craniofacial syndromes and surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131 (01) 86e-109e
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Wieczorek D. Human facial dysostoses. Clin Genet 2013; 83 (06) 499-510
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Runyan CM, Xu M D W, Alperovich M. et al. Minor suture fusion in syndromic craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 140 (03) 434e-445e
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Katzen JT, McCarthy JG. Syndromes involving craniosynostosis and midface hypoplasia. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2000; 33 (06) 1257-1284 , vi
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Wieland I, Jakubiczka S, Muschke P. et al. Mutations of the ephrin-B1 gene cause craniofrontonasal syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 2004; 74 (06) 1209-1215
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Mahapatra AK, Agrawal D. Anterior encephaloceles: a series of 103 cases over 32 years. J Clin Neurosci 2006; 13 (05) 536-539
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Winters R. Tessier clefts and hypertelorism. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2016; 24 (04) 545-558
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 David LR, Fisher D, Argenta L. New technique for reconstructing the affected cranium and orbital rim in unicoronal craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg 2009; 20 (01) 194-197
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Touzé R, Paternoster G, Arnaud E. et al. Ophthalmological findings in children with unicoronal craniosynostosis. Eur J Ophthalmol 2022; 32 (06) 3274-3280
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Brandstetter KA, Patel KG. Craniofacial microsomia. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2016; 24 (04) 495-515
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Sakamoto Y, Tamada I, Sakamoto T, Ishii T, Kishi K. Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis without bicoronal incision. J Craniofac Surg 2020; 31 (06) 1753-1755
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Gwanmesia I, Mlynek K, Papay FA, Doumit GD. Orbital box osteotomy for orbital dystopia. In: Mesa J, Buchman S, Mackay DR, Losee JE, Havlik RJ. eds. Atlas of Operative Craniofacial Surgery. Thieme; 2019: 99-108
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Lopez CD, Kumar A, Lin AY. et al. Demystifying the “triple point: ” technical nuances of the fronto-orbital advancement. J Craniofac Surg 2018; 29 (03) 796-799
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Hester KM, Rahimi OB, Fry CL, Nation HL. A cadaveric study investigating the anatomy of the medial orbital wall. Anat Cell Biol 2021; 54 (03) 297-303
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Mulliken JB, Godwin SL, Pracharktam N, Altobelli DE. The concept of the sagittal orbital-globe relationship in craniofacial surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 97 (04) 700-706
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Caprioglio A, Panzi S, Fastuca R. et al. Cephalometric evaluation of ocular protrusion at stages of growth. J Craniofac Surg 2014; 25 (03) 818-821
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Resnick CM, Salcines A, Hughes CD, Padwa BL, Mulliken JB. Retroposition of the globe after Le Fort III midfacial distraction. J Craniofac Surg 2019; 30 (02) 358-362
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Ko EW, Chen PK, Tai IC, Huang CS. Fronto-facial monobloc distraction in syndromic craniosynostosis. Three-dimensional evaluation of treatment outcome and facial growth. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012; 41 (01) 20-27
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Layton RG, Pontier JF, Bins GP, Sucher BJ, Runyan CM. Morphology of the occipital bones and foramen magnum resulting from premature minor suture fusion in crouzon syndrome. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2023; 60 (05) 591-600
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 26 McCarthy JG, Flores RL. Distraction of the midface: Le Fort III and monobloc. In: McCarthy JG. ed. Craniofacial Distraction. Springer; 2017: 135-176
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Tunçbilek G. Le Fort III osteotomy with external distraction. In: Chung KC. ed. Operative Techniques in Plastic Surgery. First edition. ed.. Wolters Kluwer; 2020: 621-633
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Patel P, Mesa J. LeFort III osteotomy. In: Mesa J, Buchman S, Mackay DR, Losee JE, Havlik RJ. eds. Atlas of Operative Craniofacial Surgery. Thieme; 2019: 257-268
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Vu DD, Tiwana PS. Le Fort III and Le Fort II osteotomies. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2016; 24 (01) 15-25
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Saettele M, Alexander A, Markovich B, Morelli J, Lowe LH. Congenital midline nasofrontal masses. Pediatr Radiol 2012; 42 (09) 1119-1125
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 31 Jensen JN, McCarthy JG, Grayson BH, Nusbaum AO, Eski M. Bone deposition/generation with LeFort III (midface) distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (01) 298-307
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 32 Cruz AA, Akaishi PM, Arnaud E, Marchac D, Renier D. Palpebral fissure changes after monobloc frontofacial advancement in faciocraniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg 2008; 19 (01) 106-109
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 33 Escaravage Jr GK, Dutton JJ. Age-related changes in the pediatric human orbit on CT. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 29 (03) 150-156
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 34 Hammoudeh JA, Goel P, Wolfswinkel EM. et al. Simultaneous midface advancement and orthognathic surgery: a powerful technique for managing midface hypoplasia and malocclusion. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 145 (06) 1067e-1072e
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 35 Shetye PR, Giannoutsos E, Grayson BH, McCarthy JG. Le Fort III distraction: part I. Controlling position and vectors of the midface segment. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (03) 871-878
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 36 Figueroa AA, Polley JW, Figueroa AD. Biomechanical considerations for distraction of the monobloc, Le Fort III, and Le Fort I segments. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (03) 1005-1013
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 37 Francis C, Rommer E, Mancho S, Carey J, Hammoudeh JA, Urata MM. Vector control in internal midface distraction using temporary anchorage devices. J Craniofac Surg 2012; 23 (7, Suppl 1) 2000-2003
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 38 Ortiz-Monasterio F, del Campo AF, Carrillo A. Advancement of the orbits and the midface in one piece, combined with frontal repositioning, for the correction of Crouzon's deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 1978; 61 (04) 507-516
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 39 Polley JW, Figueroa AA, Girotto JA, Dietze-Fiedler ML. Monobloc differential distraction osteogenesis. J Craniofac Surg 2022; 33 (01) 270-275
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 40 Arnaud E, Marchac D, Renier D. Reduction of morbidity of the frontofacial monobloc advancement in children by the use of internal distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (04) 1009-1026
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 41 Shin JH, Duncan CC, Persing J. Monobloc distraction: technical modification and considerations. J Craniofac Surg 2003; 14 (05) 763-766
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 42 Bradley JP, Gabbay JS, Taub PJ. et al. Monobloc advancement by distraction osteogenesis decreases morbidity and relapse. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118 (07) 1585-1597
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 43 Morice A, Paternoster G, Ostertag A. et al. Anterior skull base and pericranial flap ossification after frontofacial monobloc advancement. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141 (02) 437-445
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 44 Hopper RA, Prucz RB, Iamphongsai S. Achieving differential facial changes with Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis: the use of nasal passenger grafts, cerclage hinges, and segmental movements. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (06) 1281-1288
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 45 Paliga JT, Goldstein JA, Storm PB, Taylor JA. Monobloc minus Le Fort II for single-stage treatment of the Apert phenotype. J Craniofac Surg 2013; 24 (04) 1380-1382
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 46 Caterson EJ, Shetye PR, Grayson BH, McCarthy JG. Surgical management of patients with a history of early Le Fort III advancement after they have attained skeletal maturity. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132 (04) 592e-601e
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 47 Hopper RA, Kapadia H, Morton T. Normalizing facial ratios in apert syndrome patients with Le Fort II midface distraction and simultaneous zygomatic repositioning. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132 (01) 129-140
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 48 Hopper RA, Kapadia H, Susarla SM. Le Fort II distraction with zygomatic repositioning: a technique for differential correction of midface hypoplasia. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018; 76 (09) 2002.e1-2002.e14
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 49 Hopper RA, Wang HD, Mercan E. Le Fort II distraction with simultaneous zygomatic repositioning. Clin Plast Surg 2021; 48 (03) 487-496
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 50 Massenburg BB, Susarla SM, Kapadia HP, Hopper RA. Subcranial midface advancement in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2022; 34 (03) 467-475
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 51 Kreiborg S, Cohen Jr MM. The infant Apert skull. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1991; 2 (03) 551-554
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 52 Ching JA, Forrest CR. Facial bipartition. In: Chung KC. ed. Operative Techniques in Plastic Surgery. First edition. ed.. Wolters Kluwer; 2020: 542-554
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 53 Hansman CF. Growth of interorbital distance and skull thickness as observed in roentgenographic measurements. Radiology 1966; 86 (01) 87-96
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 54 Jullabussapa N, Khwanngern K, Pateekhum C, Angkurawaranon C, Angkurawaranon S. CT-based measurements of facial parameters of healthy children and adolescents in Thailand. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2020; 41 (10) 1937-1942
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 55 Greig AVH, Dunaway DJ. Facial bipartition distraction. In: McCarthy JG. ed. Craniofacial Distraction. Springer; 2017: 177-190
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 56 van der Meulen JC. Medial faciotomy. Br J Plast Surg 1979; 32 (04) 339-342
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 57 Tessier P, Tulasne JF. Stability in correction of hypertelorbitism and Treacher Collins syndromes. Clin Plast Surg 1989; 16 (01) 195-204
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 58 Ortiz Monasterio F, Medina O, Musolas A. Geometrical planning for the correction of orbital hypertelorism. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990; 86 (04) 650-657
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 59 Schlund M, Paré A, Joly A, Laure B. Computer-assisted surgery in facial bipartition surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018; 76 (05) 1094.e1-1094.e7
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 60 Marchac D, Sati S, Renier D, Deschamps-Braly J, Marchac A. Hypertelorism correction: what happens with growth? Evaluation of a series of 95 surgical cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129 (03) 713-727
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 61 Tholpady S, Havlik RJ, Eppley BL. Box and u-shaped osteotomies. In: Chung KC. ed. Operative Techniques in Plastic Surgery. First edition. ed.. Wolters Kluwer; 2020: 536-541
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 62 Laure B, Batut C, Benouhagrem A. et al. Addressing hypertelorism: Indications and techniques. Neurochirurgie 2019; 65 (05) 286-294
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 63 Breakey W, Abela C, Evans R. et al. Hypertelorism correction with facial bipartition and box osteotomy: does soft tissue translation correlate with bony movement?. J Craniofac Surg 2015; 26 (01) 196-200
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 64 Vuillemin T, Raveh J. Subcranial approach for the correction of hypertelorism. J Craniofac Surg 1990; 1 (02) 91-96
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 65 Velarde K, Cafino R, Isla Jr A. et al. Virtual surgical planning in craniomaxillofacial surgery: a structured review. Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon) 2023; 28 (01) 2271160
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar