Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1785683
Tracking Wall Characteristics of Necrotic Pancreatic Fluid Collections in Acute Pancreatitis on Serial Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography
Funding None.Abstract
Background Encapsulated pancreatic fluid collection (PFC) is a requisite for endoscopic drainage procedures. The 4-week threshold for defining walled-off necrosis does not capture the dynamic process of encapsulation. We aim to investigate the changes in the wall characteristics of PFC in acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP) by comparing baseline contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) with follow-up CT scans.
Methods This retrospective study comprised consecutive patients with ANP who underwent a baseline CECT within first 2 weeks and follow-up CECT in the third to fifth weeks of illness. Presence, extent, and encapsulation thickness (defined as enhancing wall around the collection) on baseline CECT were compared with follow-up CT (done in the third–fifth weeks of illness).
Results Thirty patients (19 males and 11 females; mean age 41.5 ± 13.5 years) were included in the study. The mean time to first CECT was 10 ± 3.6 days. There were 58 collections. The most common site was the lesser sac (n = 29), followed by the left pararenal space (n = 15). At baseline CT, 52 (89.7%) collections had varying degree of encapsulation (15.3%, complete encapsulation). Complete encapsulation was seen in 52 and 82.6% collections in third and fourth week, respectively. All collections in fifth week and beyond were encapsulated. The wall was thicker on follow-up CECT scans (p < 0.01). The mean wall thickness was not significantly associated with the degree of encapsulation (p = 0.417). There was no significant association between the site and degree of encapsulation (p = 0.546).
Conclusion Encapsulation is dynamic and collections may get “walled off” before 4 weeks. Walled-off collections should be defined based on imaging rather than a fixed 4-week revised Atlanta classification threshold.
Publication History
Article published online:
03 May 2024
© 2024. Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Russo MW, Wei JT, Thiny MT. et al. Digestive and liver diseases statistics, 2004. Gastroenterology 2004; 126 (05) 1448-1453
- 2 Triester SL, Kowdley KV. Prognostic factors in acute pancreatitis. J Clin Gastroenterol 2002; 34 (02) 167-176
- 3 Dervenis C, Johnson CD, Bassi C. et al. Diagnosis, objective assessment of severity, and management of acute pancreatitis. Santorini consensus conference. Int J Pancreatol 1999; 25 (03) 195-210
- 4 Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C. et al; Acute Pancreatitis Classification Working Group. Classification of acute pancreatitis–2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut 2013; 62 (01) 102-111
- 5 Dorrell R, Pawa S, Pawa R. Endoscopic management of pancreatic fluid collections. J Clin Med 2021; 10 (02) 284
- 6 Bansal A, Gupta P, Singh AK. et al. Drainage of pancreatic fluid collections in acute pancreatitis: a comprehensive overview. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10 (20) 6769-6783
- 7 Bomman S, Sanders D, Coy D. et al. Safety and clinical outcomes of early dual modality drainage (< 28 days) compared to later drainage of pancreatic necrotic fluid collections: a propensity score-matched study. Surg Endosc 2023; 37 (02) 902-911
- 8 Fung C, Svystun O, Fouladi DF, Kawamoto S. CT imaging, classification, and complications of acute pancreatitis. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2020; 45 (05) 1243-1252
- 9 Ramai D, Enofe I, Deliwala SS. et al. Early (<4 weeks) versus standard (≥4 weeks) endoscopic drainage of pancreatic walled-off fluid collections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 97 (03) 415-421.e5
- 10 Bhatia H, Farook S, Bendale CU. et al. Early vs. late percutaneous catheter drainage of acute necrotic collections in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2023; 48 (07) 2415-2424
- 11 Trikudanathan G, Tawfik P, Amateau SK. et al. Early (<4 Weeks) versus standard (≥4 Weeks) endoscopically centered step-up interventions for necrotizing pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2018; 113 (10) 1550-1558
- 12 Oblizajek N, Takahashi N, Agayeva S. et al. Outcomes of early endoscopic intervention for pancreatic necrotic collections: a matched case-control study. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 91 (06) 1303-1309
- 13 Lu J, Cao F, Zheng Z. et al. How to identify the indications for early intervention in acute necrotizing pancreatitis patients: a long-term follow-up study. Front Surg 2022; 9: 842016
- 14 van Grinsven J, van Brunschot S, van Baal MC. et al; Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group. Natural history of gas configurations and encapsulation in necrotic collections during necrotizing pancreatitis. J Gastrointest Surg 2018; 22 (09) 1557-1564
- 15 Choudhury SR, Manoj M, Gupta P, Samanta J, Mandavdhare H, Kochhar R. Wall maturation in necrotic collections in acute pancreatitis: a computed tomography based evaluation. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 2022; 85 (03) 463-467