Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1785206
Risk Factors for Recurrence after Surgical Resection of Sinonasal Inverted Papilloma
Funding The authors declare that they have received no funding from agencies in the public, private or non-profit sectors for the conduction of the present study.Abstract
Introduction Sinonasal inverted papilloma (SNIP) is a rare benign epithelial tumor of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses that accounts for 0.4% and 4.7% respectively, of all tumors of this anatomical region.
Objective To analyze the outcomes after surgical resection of SNIP and identify the risk factors for recurrence in a Swiss tertiary center.
Methods We conducted a retrospective review of all cases of SNIP treated at the Lausanne university hospital between 2005 and 2018. All data available on the patients and tumors were collected for analysis. We studied the recurrence rate and looked for risk factors.
Results We included 57 patients with a mean age of 55.5 years. There were 46 primary cases (80.7%) and 11 recurrences (19.3%). Maxillary sinus was the most frequent location (33.3%). Approximately half of the patients (52.6%) presented with a T3 tumor according to the Krouse classification. The mean recurrence rate after surgery was of 17.5% and it was more frequent among the patients in the recurrence group (45.5%) than among the primary cases (10.9%), reaching statistical significance (odds ratio [OR] = 6.8; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.5–30.8; p = 0.0165). Most patients were treated endoscopically (94.7%). Frontal sinus location, higher Krouse stage, and combined approach seemed to increase the risk of recurrence, but without statistical significance.
Conclusion Difficult surgical access, as in the case of tumors located in the frontal sinus, higher stage of the disease, and previously operated cases carry the higher risk of incomplete resection and recurrence.
Keywords
sinonasal inverted papilloma - Schneiderian papilloma - recurrence - endoscopic resection - Krouse classificationPublication History
Received: 12 October 2022
Accepted: 30 January 2024
Article published online:
25 May 2024
© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
-
References
- 1 Thompson L. World Health Organization classification of tumours: pathology and genetics of head and neck tumours. Ear Nose Throat J 2006; 85 (02) 74
- 2 Outzen KE, Grøntveld A, Jørgensen K, Clausen PP, Ladefoged C. Inverted papilloma: incidence and late results of surgical treatment. Rhinology 1996; 34 (02) 114-118
- 3 Deitmer T, Wiener C. Is there an occupational etiology of inverted papilloma of the nose and sinuses?. Acta Otolaryngol 1996; 116 (05) 762-765
- 4 Moon IJ, Lee DY, Suh MW. et al. Cigarette smoking increases risk of recurrence for sinonasal inverted papilloma. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2010; 24 (05) 325-329
- 5 Sham CL, Lee DL, van Hasselt CA, Tong MC. A case-control study of the risk factors associated with sinonasal inverted papilloma. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2010; 24 (01) e37-e40
- 6 Liu W, Li Z, Luo Q. et al. The elevated expression of osteopontin and vascular endothelial growth factor in sinonasal inverted papilloma and its relationship with clinical severity. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2011; 25 (05) 313-317
- 7 Roh HJ, Procop GW, Batra PS, Citardi MJ, Lanza DC. Inflammation and the pathogenesis of inverted papilloma. Am J Rhinol 2004; 18 (02) 65-74
- 8 Lawson W, Schlecht NF, Brandwein-Gensler M. The role of the human papillomavirus in the pathogenesis of Schneiderian inverted papillomas: an analytic overview of the evidence. Head Neck Pathol 2008; 2 (02) 49-59
- 9 Vrabec DP. The inverted Schneiderian papilloma: a 25-year study. Laryngoscope 1994; 104 (5 Pt 1): 582-605
- 10 Krouse JH. Development of a staging system for inverted papilloma. Laryngoscope 2000; 110 (06) 965-968
- 11 Peng R, Thamboo A, Choby G, Ma Y, Zhou B, Hwang PH. Outcomes of sinonasal inverted papilloma resection by surgical approach: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2019; 9 (06) 573-581
- 12 Kim DY, Hong SL, Lee CH. et al. Inverted papilloma of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses: a Korean multicenter study. Laryngoscope 2012; 122 (03) 487-494
- 13 Lisan Q, Laccourreye O, Bonfils P. Sinonasal inverted papilloma: From diagnosis to treatment. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2016; 133 (05) 337-341
- 14 Philpott CM, Dharamsi A, Witheford M, Javer AR. Endoscopic management of inverted papillomas: long-term results–the St. Paul's Sinus Centre experience. Rhinology 2010; 48 (03) 358-363
- 15 Minni A, Gera R, Bulgheroni C. et al. Endoscopic Resection of Sinonasal Inverted Papilloma: A Multivariate Retrospective Analysis of Factors Affecting Recurrence and Persistence. Ear Nose Throat J 2021; 100 (5_suppl, suppl) 542S-548S
- 16 Bugter O, Monserez DA, van Zijl FVWJ, Baatenburg de Jong RJ, Hardillo JA. Surgical management of inverted papilloma; a single-center analysis of 247 patients with long follow-up. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 46 (01) 67
- 17 Lisan Q, Moya-Plana A, Bonfils P. Association of Krouse Classification for Sinonasal Inverted Papilloma With Recurrence: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 143 (11) 1104-1110
- 18 Woodworth BA, Bhargave GA, Palmer JN. et al. Clinical outcomes of endoscopic and endoscopic-assisted resection of inverted papillomas: a 15-year experience. [published correction appears in Am J Rhinol. 2008 Jan-Feb;22(1):97] Am J Rhinol 2007; 21 (05) 591-600
- 19 Lisan Q, Laccourreye O, Bonfils P. Sinonasal Inverted Papilloma: Risk Factors for Local Recurrence After Surgical Resection. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2017; 126 (06) 498-504
- 20 Makihara S, Kariya S, Naito T. et al. Attachment-oriented endoscopic surgical management for inverted papillomas in the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. Auris Nasus Larynx 2019; 46 (05) 748-753
- 21 Óvári A, Starke N, Schuldt T. et al. Optical coherence tomography and confocal laser scanning microscopy as non-invasive tools in the diagnosis of sinonasal inverted papilloma: a pilot study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2018; 275 (07) 1775-1781
- 22 Kidwai SM, Parasher AK, Schorn VJ. et al. Optical imaging with a high-resolution microendoscope to identify sinonasal pathology. Am J Otolaryngol 2018; 39 (04) 383-387
- 23 Li M, Huang Z, Wang Y. et al. Storz Professional Image Enhancement System (SPIES) endoscopy in the detection of sinonasal inverted papilloma: a pilot study. Acta Otolaryngol 2021; 141 (05) 513-518
- 24 Katori H, Nozawa A, Tsukuda M. Histopathological parameters of recurrence and malignant transformation in sinonasal inverted papilloma. Acta Otolaryngol 2006; 126 (02) 214-218
- 25 Takahashi Y, Shoji F, Katori Y. et al. Endoscopic surgical management of sinonasal inverted papilloma extending to frontal sinuses. Otolaryngol Pol 2016; 70 (06) 26-32