Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1779691
Assessing the individual risk of stroke in caregivers of patients with stroke
Evaluación del riesgo individual de enfermedad cerebrovascular en cuidadores de pacientes con enfermedad cerebrovascularAuthors

Abstract
Background Genetic factors influence the risk of developing stroke. Still, it is unclear whether this risk is intrinsically high in certain people or if nongenetic factors explain it entirely.
Objective To compare the risk of stroke in kin and nonkin caregivers.
Methods In a cross-sectional study using the Stroke Riskometer app (AUT Ventures Limited, Auckland, AUK, New Zealand), we determined the 5- and 10-year stroke risk (SR) among caregivers of stroke inpatients. The degree of kinship was rated with a score ranging from 0 to 50 points.
Results We studied 278 caregivers (69.4% of them female) with a mean age of 47.5 ± 14.2 years. Kin caregivers represented 70.1% of the sample, and 49.6% of them were offspring. The median SR at 5 years was of 2.1 (range: 0.35–17.3) versus 1.73 (range: 0.04–29.9), and of 4.0 (range: 0.45–38.6) versus 2.94 (range: 0.05–59.35) at 10 years for the nonkin and kin caregivers respectively. In linear logistic regression controlled for the age of the caregivers, adding the kinship score did not increase the overall variability of the model for the risk at 5 years (R2 = 0.271; p = 0.858) nor the risk at 10 years (R2 = 0.376; p = 0.78).
Conclusion Caregivers of stroke patients carry a high SR regardless of their degree of kinship.
Resumen
Antecedentes Los factores genéticos probablemente influyen en el riesgo de desarrollar enfermedad vascular cerebral (EVC), pero no está claro si el riesgo es intrínsecamente alto o si es totalmente explicado por factores modificables.
Objetivo Comparar el riesgo de EVC (REVC) en cuidadores pertenecientes y no pertenecientes a la misma familia de pacientes con EVC.
Métodos En un estudio transversal que utilizó la aplicación Stroke Riskometer (AUT Ventures Limited, Auckland, AUK, Nueva Zelanda), determinamos el REVC a 5 y 10 años en cuidadores de pacientes hospitalizados por EVC. El grado de parentesco se graduó con un puntaje de 0 a 50 dependiendo de su relación familiar con el paciente.
Resultados Estudiamos a 278 cuidadores (69.4% de ellos mujeres) con edad media de 47.5 ± 14.2 años. Los cuidadores familiares representaron el 70.1% de la muestra, siendo el 49.6% hijos. Las medianas de REVC a 5 años fueron de 2.1 (rango: 0.35–17.3) versus 1.73 (rango: 0.04–29.9), y de 4.0 (rango: 0.45–38.6) versus 2.94 (rango: 0.05–59.35) a 10 años para el grupo de cuidadores familiares y no familiares, respectivamente. En una regresión logística lineal contralando para la edad de los cuidadores, la adición del puntaje de parentesco no incrementó la variabilidad general del modelo para el riesgo a 5 años (R2 = 0.271; p = 0.858) ni para el riesgo a 10 años (R2 = 0.376; p = 0.78).
Conclusión Los cuidadores de pacientes con EVC tienen un REVC alto, independientemente de su grado de parentesco.
Authors' Contributions
JMMR: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, writing of the original draft, and writing – review and editing; JRM: investigation, methodology, and writing – review and editing; BHC: formal analysis, investigation, methodology, and writing – review and editing; ARF: data curation, formal analysis, methodology, and writing – review and editing; RK: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, and writing – review and editing; and VF: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, supervision, validation, and writing – review and editing.
Publication History
Received: 26 August 2023
Accepted: 29 December 2023
Article published online:
11 March 2024
© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
Juan Manuel Marquez-Romero, Jessica Romo-Martínez, Bernardo Hernández-Curiel, Angélica Ruiz-Franco, Rita Krishnamurthi, Valery Feigin. Assessing the individual risk of stroke in caregivers of patients with stroke. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2024; 82: s00441779691.
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1779691
-
References
- 1 Virani SS, Alonso A, Aparicio HJ. et al; American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2021 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation 2021; 143 (08) e254-e743
- 2 Johnson W, Onuma O, Owolabi M, Sachdev S. Stroke: a global response is needed. Bull World Health Organ 2016; 94 (09) 634-634A
- 3 Lanas F, Seron P. Facing the stroke burden worldwide. Lancet Glob Health 2021; 9 (03) e235-e236
- 4 Martins SCO, Lavados P, Secchi TL. et al. Fighting Against Stroke in Latin America: A Joint Effort of Medical Professional Societies and Governments. Front Neurol 2021; 12: 743732
- 5 Bakhtiari A, Takian A, Majdzadeh R, Haghdoost AA. Assessment and prioritization of the WHO “best buys” and other recommended interventions for the prevention and control of non-communicable diseases in Iran. BMC Public Health 2020; 20 (01) 333
- 6 Haley WE, Roth DL, Howard G, Safford MM. Caregiving strain and estimated risk for stroke and coronary heart disease among spouse caregivers: differential effects by race and sex. Stroke 2010; 41 (02) 331-336
- 7 Parmar P, Krishnamurthi R, Ikram MA. et al; Stroke RiskometerTM Collaboration Writing Group. The Stroke Riskometer(TM) App: validation of a data collection tool and stroke risk predictor. Int J Stroke 2015; 10 (02) 231-244
- 8 O'Donnell MJ, Xavier D, Liu L. et al; INTERSTROKE investigators. Risk factors for ischaemic and intracerebral haemorrhagic stroke in 22 countries (the INTERSTROKE study): a case-control study. Lancet 2010; 376 (9735) 112-123
- 9 Medvedev O, Truong QC, Merkin A, Borotkanics R, Krishnamurthi R, Feigin V. Cross-cultural validation of the stroke riskometer using generalizability theory. Sci Rep 2021; 11 (01) 19064
- 10 Hill WG, Weir BS. Variation in actual relationship as a consequence of Mendelian sampling and linkage. Genet Res 2011; 93 (01) 47-64
- 11 Henn BM, Hon L, Macpherson JM. et al. Cryptic distant relatives are common in both isolated and cosmopolitan genetic samples. PLoS One 2012; 7 (04) e34267
- 12 Griessenauer CJ, Farrell S, Sarkar A. et al. Genetic susceptibility to cerebrovascular disease: A systematic review. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2018; 38 (11) 1853-1871
- 13 Marston NA, Patel PN, Kamanu FK. et al. Clinical Application of a Novel Genetic Risk Score for Ischemic Stroke in Patients With Cardiometabolic Disease. Circulation 2021; 143 (05) 470-478
- 14 Hachiya T, Kamatani Y, Takahashi A. et al. Genetic Predisposition to Ischemic Stroke: A Polygenic Risk Score. Stroke 2017; 48 (02) 253-258
- 15 Ross A, Sundaramurthi T, Bevans M. A labor of love: the influence of cancer caregiving on health behaviors. Cancer Nurs 2013; 36 (06) 474-483