Reference Values for Shear Wave Elastography of Neck and Shoulder Muscles in Healthy Individuals

Abstract

Purpose to establish reference values for ultrasound shear-wave elastography for pericranial muscles in healthy individuals (m. trapezius, m. splenius capitis, m. semispinalis capitis, m. sternocleidomastoideus and m. masseter). Also to evaluate day-to-day variations in the shear-wave speeds and evaluate the effect of the pennation of the muscle fibers, ie scanning parallel or perpendicularly to the fibers.

Materials and Methods 10 healthy individuals (5 males and 5 females) had their pericranial muscles examined with shear-wave elastography in two orthogonal planes on two different days for their dominant and non-dominant side. Mean shear wave speeds from 5 ROI’s in each muscle, for each scan plane for the dominant and non-dominant side for the two days were calculated. The effect of the different parameters – muscle pennation, gender, dominant vs non-dominant side and day was evaluated.

Results The effect of scan plane in relation to muscle pennation was statistically significant (p<0.0001). The mean shear-wave speed when scanning parallel to the muscle fibers was significantly higher than the mean shear-wave speed when scanning perpendicularly to the fibers. The day-to-day variation was statistically significant (p=0.0258), but not clinically relevant. Shear-wave speeds differed significantly between muscles. Mean shear wave speeds (m/s) for the muscles in the parallel plane were: for masseter 2.45 (SD:+/−0.25), semispinal 3.36 (SD:+/−0.75), splenius 3.04 (SD:+/−0.65), sternocleidomastoid 2.75 (SD:+/−0.23), trapezius 3.20 (SD:+/−0.27) and trapezius lateral 3.87 (SD:+/−3.87).

Conclusion The shear wave speed variation depended on the direction of scanning. Shear wave elastography may be a method to evaluate muscle stiffness in patients suffering from chronic neck pain.

Key words

muscular - ultrasound - elastography

• References

• 1 Bamber J, Cosgrove D, Dietrich CF, Fromageau J, Bojunga J, Calliada F. et al. EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Part 1: Basic principles and technology. Ultraschall in Med 2013; 34: 169-184
• 2 Cantisani V, D'Andrea V, Biancari F, Medvedyeva O, Di Segni M, Olive M. et al. Prospective evaluation of multiparametric ultrasound and quantitative elastosonography in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules: Preliminary experience. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81: 2678-2683
• 3 Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, Kamma H, Takahashi H, Shiina T. et al. Breast disease: Clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology 2006; 239: 341-350
• 4 Cassinotto C, Lapuyade B, Ait-Ali A, Vergniol J, Gaye D, Foucher J. et al. Liver fibrosis: Noninvasive assessment with acoustic radiation force impulse elastography–comparison with FibroScan M and XL probes and FibroTest in patients with chronic liver disease. Radiology 2013; 269: 283-292
• 5 Chino K, Akagi R, Dohi M, Fukashiro S, Takahashi H. Reliability and validity of quantifying absolute muscle hardness using ultrasound elastography. PloS One 2012; 7: e45764
• 6 Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache S. The international classification of headache disorders, 3rd ed. (beta version). Cephalalgia 2013; 33: 629-808
• 7 Ashina S, Bendtsen L, Lyngberg AC, Lipton RB, Hajiyeva N, Jensen R. Prevalence of neck pain in migraine and tension-type headache: A population study. Cephalalgia 2015; 35: 211-219
• 8 Langemark M, Jensen K, Jensen TS, Olesen J. Pressure pain thresholds and thermal nociceptive thresholds in chronic tension-type headache. Pain 1989; 38: 203-210
• 9 Jensen R, Rasmussen BK, Pedersen B, Olesen J. Muscle tenderness and pressure pain thresholds in headache. A population study. Pain 1993; 52: 193-199
• 10 Sakai F, Ebihara S, Akiyama M, Horikawa M. Pericranial muscle hardness in tension-type headache. A non-invasive measurement method and its clinical application. Brain 1995; 118: 523-531
• 11 Ashina M, Bendtsen L, Jensen R, Sakai F, Olesen J. Muscle hardness in patients with chronic tension-type headache: Relation to actual headache state. Pain 1999; 79: 201-205
• 12 Gennisson JL, Catheline S, Chaffai S, Fink M. Transient elastography in anisotropic medium: Application to the measurement of slow and fast shear wave speeds in muscles. J Acoust Soc Am 2003; 114: 536-541
• 13 Eby SF, Song P, Chen S, Chen Q, Greenleaf JF, An KN. Validation of shear wave elastography in skeletal muscle. J biomech 2013; 46: 2381-2387
• 14 Morrow DA, Haut Donahue TL, Odegard GM, Kaufman KR. Transversely isotropic tensile material properties of skeletal muscle tissue. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2010; 3: 124-129
• 15 Niitsu M, Michizaki A, Endo A, Takei H, Yanagisawa O. Muscle hardness measurement by using ultrasound elastography: A feasibility study. Acta Radiol 2011; 52: 99-105
• 16 Kuo WH, Jian DW, Wang TG, Wang YC. Neck muscle stiffness quantified by sonoelastography is correlated with body mass index and chronic neck pain symptoms. UMB 2013; 39: 1356-1361
• 17 Chang S, Kim MJ, Kim J, Lee MJ. Variability of shear wave velocity using different frequencies in acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) elastography: A phantom and normal liver study. Ultraschall in Med 2013; 34: 260-265
• 18 Ewertsen C, Carlsen JF, Christiansen IR, Jensen JA, Nielsen MB. Evaluation of healthy muscle tissue by strain and shear wave elastography – Dependency on depth and ROI position in relation to underlying bone. Ultrasonics 2016; 71: 127-133
• 19 Kot BC, Zhang ZJ, Lee AW, Leung VY, Fu SN. Elastic modulus of muscle and tendon with shear wave ultrasound elastography: Variations with different technical settings. PloS One 2012; 7: e44348