Download PDF
Klin Padiatr 2018; 230(04): 194-199
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-101622
Original Article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Update on Transumbilical Single-Incision Laparoscopic Assisted Appendectomy (TULAA) – Which Children Benefit and What are the Complications?

Laparoskopisch assistierte single-incision Appendektomie – Welche Kinder profitieren und welche Komplikationen können erwartet werden?
Martin Dübbers
1   Division of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Köln, Germany
,
Elena Nikolaou
1   Division of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Köln, Germany
,
Hans Fuchs
2   Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Köln, Germany
,
Janina Fischer
3   Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Köln, Germany
,
Hakan Alakus
2   Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Köln, Germany
,
Jessica Leers
2   Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Köln, Germany
,
Christiane Bruns
2   Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Köln, Germany
,
Grigore Cernaianu
1   Division of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Köln, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
15 March 2018 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy (TULAA) is fast and cost-effective since no endoloops, staplers or wound protection devices are used. We analyzed the effects of TULAA as first approach for perforated (PA) and non-perforated (NPA) appendicitis in children.

Patients We performed a retrospective analysis of 181 children for whom TULAA was the first approach for appendicitis between October 2010 and March 2016.

Methods Morbidity, additional laparoscopic instrument insertion (AI), conversions to open extraumbilical appendectomy (OC), and complications were evaluated.

Results TULAA was initiated in 181 (87.4%) children (113 boys: 68 girls). Median age was 10.3 years (3.3–13.9 years) and BMI 16.8 kg/m2 (12.4–30.8). Appendicitis was non-perforated in 157 (86.7%) and perforated in 24 (13.3%) patients. TULAA was finalized in 142 (78.5%) patients, AI were inserted in 20 (11%) and OC were performed in 19 (10.5%) patients. Duration of surgery did not exceed 20 min for 12.8%, and 30 min for 43.6% of patients with TULAA and NPA. The rate of wound infections did not differ between procedures (TULAA 3/142 (2.1%), AI 0 (0%), OC 1/19 (5.3%), P=1.000). Further postoperative course was uneventful in 179 (98.9%) patients.

Conclusion TULAA can be used as first approach for appendicitis in all children with a low rate of complications. Extracorporeal appendix stump closure can be safely achieved in the majority of children without using laparoscopic disposable devices.

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund Die transumbilikale laparoskopisch assistierte Appendektomie (TULAA) ist aufgrund des Verzichts auf endoskopisches Einweg-Material schnell und kostengünstig. Wir untersuchten die Auswirkungen von TULAA als primäres Verfahren bei perforierter (PA) und nicht perforierter (NPA) Appendizitis im Kindesalter.

Patienten Wir führten eine retrospektive Analyse bei 181 Kindern durch, bei denen zwischen Oktober 2000 und März 2016 TULAA als primäres Verfahren zur Behandlung der Appendizitis eingesetzt wurde.

Methoden Erfasst wurden Morbidität, die Insertion zusätzlicher laparoskopischer Instrumente (AI), Konversionen zur offenen extraumbilikalen Appendektomie (OC) und Komplikationen.

Ergebnisse TULAA wurde bei 181 Kindern begonnen (87,4%) (113 Jungen: 68 Mädchen). Das mediane Alter betrug 10,3 Jahre (3,3 – 13,9) und der BMI 16.8 kg/m2 (12,4–30,8). NPA lag in 157 (86,7%) und PA in 24 (13.3%) Patienten vor. TULAA wurde in 142 (78,5%) durchgeführt, AI erfolgte in 20 (11%) und OC in 19 (10,5%) Patienten. Die OP-Dauer überschritt nicht 20 Min bei 12,8%, und nicht 30 Min bei 43,6% der Patienten mit TULAA und NPA. Die Rate von Wundheilungsstörungen unterschied sich nicht zwischen den OP-Verfahren (TULAA 3/142 (2,1%), AI 0 (0%), OC 1/19 (5,3%), P=1,000). Der postoperative Verlauf gestaltete sich komplikationslos in 179 (98,9%) Patienten.

Zusammenfassung TULAA kann als primäres Appendektomie-Verfahren mit einer niedrigen Komplikationsrate bei allen Kindern verwendet werden. Der extrakorporale Appendixstumpfverschluß kann bei den meisten Kindern ohne Einsatz von endoskopischem Einweg-Material durchgeführt werden.

Key words

appendicitis - children - single incision - TULAA

Schlüsselwörter

Appendizitis - Kinder - single incision - TULAA
 

  • References

  • 1 Bergholz R, Klein I, Wenke K. et al. Midterm outcome of transumbilically laparoscopic-assisted versus laparoscopic and open appendectomy in children—a matched prospective study. Eur J Pediatr. Surg 2014; 25: 216-219
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Blakely ML, Spurbeck WW, Lobe TE. Current status of laparoscopic appendectomy in children. Semin. Pediatr. Surg 1998; 7: 225-227
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Boo YJ, Lee Y, Lee JS. Comparison of transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy versus single incision laparoscopic appendectomy in children: which is the better surgical option?. J Pediatr Surg 2016; 51: 1288-1291
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Codrich D, Scarpa MG, Lembo MA. et al. Transumbilical laparo-assisted appendectomy: a safe operation for the whole spectrum of appendicitis in children—A single-centre experience. Minim Invasive Surg 2013; 2013: 1-4
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Deie K, Uchida H, Kawashima H. et al. Single-incision laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy in children: exteriorization of the appendix is a key component of a simple and cost-effective surgical technique. Pediatr Surg Int 2013; 29: 1187-1191
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Endo K, Kujirai D, Maeda H. et al. Transumbilical laparoscopic appendectomy performed by residents is safe and feasible: Laparoscopic appendectomy by residents. Asian J Endosc Surg 2016; 9: 270-274
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Kim JH, Kim HY, Park SK. et al. Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: Experiences from 1208 cases of single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg 2015; 262: 1054-1058
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Kulaylat AN, Podany AB, Hollenbeak CS. et al. Transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy is associated with lower costs compared to multiport laparoscopic appendectomy. J Pediatr Surg 2014; 49: 1508-1512
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Mohan A, Karam PA, Buta MR. et al. Transumbilical laparoscopically assisted extracorporeal appendectomy in children and young adults: A retrospective cohort study, Int. J Surg 2016; 36: 261-264
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Ohno Y, Morimura T, Hayashi S. Transumbilical laparoscopically assisted appendectomy in children: the results of a single-port, single-channel procedure. Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 523-527
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Park J, Kwak H, Kim SG. et al. Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy: comparison with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy. J. Laparoendosc. Adv Surg Tech 2012; 22: 142-145
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Perez EA, Piper H, Burkhalter LS. et al. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery in children: a randomized control trial of acute appendicitis. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 1367-1371
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Rispoli G, Armellino MF, Esposito C. One-trocar appendectomy. Surg Endosc 2002; 16: 833-835
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Sauerland S, Jaschinski T, Neugebauer EA. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. in: The Cochrane Collaboration (Ed.) Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2010
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Peter St. SD, Adibe OO, Juang D. et al. Single Incision versus standard 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy: A prospective randomized trial. Ann. Surg. 2011; 254: 586-590
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Peter St. SD, Sharp SW, Holcomb GW. et al. An evidence-based definition for perforated appendicitis derived from a prospective randomized trial. J Pediatr Surg 2008; 43: 2242-2245
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Stylianos S, Nichols L, Ventura N. et al. The “all-in-one” appendectomy: quick, scarless, and less costly. J Pediatr Surg 2011; 46: 2336-2341
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Vahdad MR, Nissen M, Semaan A. et al. Experiences with LESS-appendectomy in Children. Arch Iran Med. 2016; 19: 57-63
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Visnjic S. Transumbilical laparoscopically assisted appendectomy in children: High-tech low-budget surgery. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 1667-1671
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar