Indikatoren der Ergebnisqualität kardiologischer Rehabilitation

Zusammenfassung

Ziel der Studie Die vorliegende Untersuchung beinhaltete die explorative Erfassung potenzieller Indikatoren der Ergebnisqualität der kardiologischen Rehabilitation (CR) für Patienten unter 65 Jahren.

Methoden In einer 4-stufigen webbasierten Delphi-Befragung (04-07/2016) von in der CR tätigen Ärzten[2] , Psychologen und Sport-/Physiotherapeuten wurden Parameter der körperlichen Leistungsfähigkeit, der Sozialmedizin, der subjektiven Gesundheit und kardiovaskuläre Risikofaktoren hinsichtlich ihrer Eignung als Qualitätsindikator bewertet.

Ergebnisse Von 44 vorgegebenen wie auch von den Teilnehmern vorgeschlagenen Parametern wurden 21 Parameter (48%), die Hälfte davon psychosoziale Faktoren, als potenzielle Qualitätsindikatoren ausgewählt, wobei lediglich für das Rauchverhalten, den Blutdruck, das LDL-Cholesterin und die max. Belastbarkeit im Belastungs-EKG ein Konsens (Zustimmung>75% der Befragten) erzielt wurde.

Schlussfolgerung Die Wahl der Qualitätsindikatoren durch die Experten erfolgte mehrheitlich mit nur geringer Einigkeit. Eine klinische und wissenschaftliche Evaluierung der gewählten Parameter ist daher zwingend erforderlich.

Abstract

Objective The present investigation aimed an explorative acquisition of potential performance measures for quantifying the quality of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) for patients under 65 years of age.

Methods A 4-level web based Delphi survey of physicians, psychologists, and sports or physiotherapists in CR was conducted from April to July in 2016. The experts assessed several parameters of physical performance, social medicine, subjective health and cardiovascular risk factors regarding their suitability as performance measures of CR.

Results Of the 44 predetermined as well as by the participants proposed parameters, 21 parameters (48%) were selected as potential performance measures. Half of these were psychosocial factors. Merely, smoking habits, blood pressure, LDL-cholesterol and maximum capacity on exercise-ECG achieved a consensus (agreement>75% of the respondents).

Conclusions The experts’ choice of performance measures was little consistent. Therefore, a clinical investigation and scientific evaluation of the predefined parameters is essential.

Schlüsselwörter

kardiologische Rehabilitation - Qualitätsindikatoren - Ergebnisqualität - Rehabilitationserfolg - Expertenbefragung

Key words

cardiac rehabilitation - quality assurance - performance measures - outcome - expert survey

• Literatur

• 1 Ayanian JZ, Markel H. Donabedian's lasting framework for health care quality. N Engl J Med 2016; 375: 205-207
• 2 Balady GJ, Williams MA, Ades PA. et al. Core components of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention programs: 2007 update: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention Committee, the Council on Clinical Cardiology; the Councils on Cardiovascular Nursing, Epidemiology and Prevention, and Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism; and the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Circulation 2007; 115: 2675-2682
• 3 Bjarnason-Wehrens B, Held K, Hoberg E. et al. Deutsche Leitlinie zur Rehabilitation von Patienten mit Herz-Kreislauferkrankungen (DLL-KardReha). Clin Res Cardiol Suppl 2007; 2: III1-III54
• 4 Salzwedel A, Nosper M, Röhrig B. et al. Outcome quality of in-patient cardiac rehabilitation in elderly patients--identification of relevant parameters. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2014; 21: 172-180
• 5 Häder M. Delphi-Befragungen: Ein Arbeitsbuch. 2 Aufl Wiesbaden: VS Verl. für Sozialwiss; 2009
• 6 Spertus JA, Eagle KA, Krumholz HM. et al. American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association methodology for the selection and creation of performance measures for quantifying the quality of cardiovascular care. Circulation 2005; 111: 1703-1712
• 7 Jha P, Ramasundarahettige C, Landsman V. et al. 21st-century hazards of smoking and benefits of cessation in the United States. N Engl J Med 2013; 368: 341-350
• 8 Myers J, Prakash M, Froelicher V. et al. Exercise capacity and mortality among men referred for exercise testing. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 793-801
• 9 Rønnevik PK, von der Lippe G. Prognostic importance of predischarge exercise capacity for long-term mortality and non-fatal myocardial infarction in patients admitted for suspected acute myocardial infarction and treated with metoprolol. Eur Heart J 1992; 13: 1468-1472
• 10 Samet JM. The 1990 Report of the surgeon general: The health benefits of smoking cessation. Am Rev Respir Dis 1990; 142: 993-994
• 11 Baigent C, Keech A, Kearney PM. et al. Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins. Lancet 2005; 366: 1267-1278
• 12 Collins R, Peto R, Godwin J. et al. Blood pressure and coronary heart disease. Lancet 1990; 336: 370-371
• 13 Völler H, Hahmann H, Gohlke H. et al. Auswirkung stationärer Rehabilitation auf kardiovaskuläre Risikofaktoren bei Patienten mit koronarer Herzerkrankung. PIN-Studiengruppe. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1999; 124: 817-823
• 14 Sellier P, Varaillac P, Chatellier G. et al. Factors influencing return to work at one year after coronary bypass graft surgery: results of the PERISCOP study. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2003; 10: 469-475
• 15 Worcester MU, Elliott PC, Turner A. et al Resumption of work after acute coronary syndrome or coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Heart Lung Circ 2014; 23: 444-453
• 16 Isaaz K, Coudrot M, Sabry MH. et al. Return to work after acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the modern era of reperfusion by direct percutaneous coronary intervention. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2010; 103: 310-316
• 17 de Jonge P, Zuidersma M, Bültmann U. The presence of a depressive episode predicts lower return to work rate after myocardial infarction. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2014; 36: 363-367
• 18 Salzwedel A, Reibis R, Wegscheider K. et al. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing is predictive of return to work in cardiac patients after multicomponent rehabilitation. Clin Res Cardiol 2016; 105: 257-267
• 19 Gragnano A, Negrini A, Miglioretti M. et al. Common psychosocial factors predicting return to work after common mental disorders, cardiovascular diseases, and cancers: a review of reviews supporting a cross-disease approach. J Occup Rehabil 2017; Jun 6. [Epub ahead of print]
• 20 Wade DT. Outcome measures for clinical rehabilitation trials: impairment, function, quality of life, or value?. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 82: S26-S31