Endoscopy 2018; 50(05): E111-E112
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-101015
E-Videos
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Cholangioscopy-guided electrohydraulic lithotripsy of large bile duct stones through a percutaneous access device

Kilian Weigand
1   Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
,
Arne Kandulski
1   Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
,
Ina Zuber-Jerger
1   Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
,
Martina Mueller
1   Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
,
Holger Goessmann
2   Department of Radiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
16 February 2018 (online)

We report a clinical case series of five patients with choledocholithiasis and anatomic abnormalities that made biliary access by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP) impossible. In three patients, we were unsuccessful in accessing the biliary tract by single-balloon enteroscopy because of surgically altered anatomy with biliodigestive anastomosis. In two patients, a large diverticulum prevented intubation of the common bile duct. All of the patients presented with signs of cholestasis including elevated bilirubin levels. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans revealed one to three large stones in the main or intrahepatic bile duct. Different approaches for such patients have been described [1] [2] [3].

We primarily used a percutaneous approach ([Fig. 1]); however, the stones were too hard and/or too large to be fragmented, retrieved, or transpositioned via percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography. An 8.5-Fr drain was inserted and was subsequently replaced by a 12-Fr percutaneous transbiliary drain to enlarge the insertion site. The drain was changed to a 12-Fr sheath, which was placed in the upper main bile duct or in an intrahepatic bile duct [Fig. 2]). The bile duct was directly entered via this inlet with a cholangioscope (SpyGlass Direct Visualization System; Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts, USA). Endoscopic biliary access was possible at a mean of 4 days after the initial percutaneous drainage.

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) showing large stones (▼) in the main bile duct.
Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Cholangioscopy via the percutaneous inlet. a The inlet is created by replacing the initial drain with a 12-Fr sheath (▼) to reach the main bile duct. b The biliary stone is visualized within the main duct via a cholangioscope passed through the inlet.

The stones were directly fragmented under optic visualization using an electrohydraulic lithotripsy device (P2,4/3000/f probe; Walz Elektronik GmbH, Rohrdorf, Germany) [4] ([Fig. 3]). All fragments were completely removed by flushing and suction. Complete stone removal was achieved in all patients ([Fig. 4]). An exemplary case is shown in [Video 1]. None of the patients required percutaneous papillotomy or balloon dilation.

Zoom Image
Fig. 3 Electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) via the percutaneous inlet. a The cholangioscope is inserted into the main bile duct (▼), along with the previously inserted lithotripsy probe (<). b Cholangioscopic view showing the tip of the EHL probe (†) pointing to the already fragmented stone.
Zoom Image
Fig. 4 Radiographic image after electrohydraulic lithotripsy showing that the biliary stones have been completely removed.

Video 1 A cholangioscope is passed via the percutaneous inlet. After entering the bile duct, the stone is visualized and fragmented with the electrohydraulic lithotripsy probe, which is inserted through the cholangioscope. After the procedure, the cholangioscope is inserted again and is pushed all the way into the small bowel. On withdrawal, no further stones are visualized but the bile duct is seen to be inflamed because of the stones.


Quality:

A protective 14-Fr drain was placed after the procedure. Follow-up cholangiography showed no signs of remnant bile duct stones or fragments and all patients recovered from their obstructive jaundice. Prophylactic antibiotic therapy was given to all patients. There were no major complications, such as peri-interventional cholangitis or bleeding.

This case series demonstrates the possibility of a fast percutaneous cholangioscopic management for patients with large bile duct stones and altered anatomy. Overall, in our small study, percutaneous access to the biliary tract with a cholangioscope appears to be a very safe and controlled procedure with minimal risk for the patient. Clinicians should be aware of this option to manage stones in the bile duct, even those that are hard and large, when classical procedures such as ERCP, or single- or double-balloon ERCP are not possible.

Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AR_2AH

Endoscopy E-Videos
https://eref.thieme.de/e-videos

Endoscopy E-Videos is a free access online section, reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy. All papers include a high quality video and all contributions are freely accessible online.
This section has its own submission website at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos

 
  • References

  • 1 Stefanidis G, Christodoulou C, Manolakopoulos S. et al. Endoscopic extraction of large common bile duct stones: A review article. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 16: 167-179
  • 2 Han JY, Jeong S, Lee DH. Percutaneous papillary large balloon dilation during percutaneous cholangioscopic lithotripsy for the treatment of large bile-duct stones: a feasibility study. J Korean Med Sci 2015; 30: 278-282
  • 3 Wang P, Sun B, Huang B. et al. Comparison between percutaneous transhepatic rigid cholangioscopic lithotripsy and conventional percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopic surgery for hepatolithiasis treatment. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2016; 26: 54-59
  • 4 Hodo Y, Shirota Y, Suda T. et al. Transcatheter pancreatoscopy-guided electrohydraulic lithotripsy for large pancreatic duct stones. Endoscopy 2017; 49: E147-E148