Breaking Boundaries: Toward Consistent Gender-Sensitive Language in Sexual and Reproductive Health Guidelines

Abstract

This review assesses gender-sensitive language in sexual and reproductive health (SRH) guidelines, including a guideline for polycystic ovary syndrome. We conducted a systematic search across databases like Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane until July 31, 2023, using terms related to gender-inclusivity, SRH, and guideline protocols. Criteria for inclusion were gender-sensitive language, SRH focus, and guideline relevance, excluding non-English articles or those without policy considerations. Our search yielded 25 studies, with 6 included for qualitative synthesis. Results showed significant gaps in using gender-sensitive language in SRH guidelines. The debate on this language mirrors broader societal discourse. Recognizing gender diversity is essential for research, clinical practices, and societal norms. While promoting inclusion, drawbacks like unintended erasure or miscommunication should also be addressed. A gender-additive approach balances inclusivity and biological accuracy. Precise and inclusive discourse is crucial. Future research should focus on systemic approaches in the SRH sector.

Keywords

gender - gender-sensitive language - sexual and reproductive health - guidelines - sex - health

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
05. Dezember 2023

• References

• 1 Department of Health. Clinical practice guidelines. Australian Government. Accessed August 1, 2022 at: https://www1.health.gov.au/internet/publications/publishing.nsf/Content/qupp-review~qupp-clinical-practice-guidelines
• 2 Caughey AB, Krist AH, Wolff TA. et al. USPSTF approach to addressing sex and gender when making recommendations for clinical preventive services. JAMA 2021; 326 (19) 1953-1961
• 3 Greenhalgh T, Thorne S, Malterud K. Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews?. Eur J Clin Invest 2018; 48 (06) e12931
• 4 Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J 2009; 26 (02) 91-108
• 5 Rioux C, Weedon S, London-Nadeau K. et al. Gender-inclusive writing for epidemiological research on pregnancy. J Epidemiol Community Health 2022; 76 (09) 823-827
• 6 Kirubarajan A, Patel P, Leung S, Park B, Sierra S. Cultural competence in fertility care for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer people: a systematic review of patient and provider perspectives. Fertil Steril 2021; 115 (05) 1294-1301
• 7 Fix L, Durden M, Obedin-Maliver J. et al. Stakeholder perceptions and experiences regarding access to contraception and abortion for transgender, non-binary, and gender-expansive individuals assigned female at birth in the U.S. Arch Sex Behav 2020; 49 (07) 2683-2702
• 8 Moseson H, Fix L, Ragosta S. et al. Abortion experiences and preferences of transgender, nonbinary, and gender-expansive people in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021; 224 (04) 376.e1-376.e11
• 9 Likis FE. New aims and scope for the Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health support health equity, sexual and reproductive health, and gender-inclusive language. J Midwifery Womens Health 2019; 64 (04) 369-370
• 10 Gribble KD, Bewley S, Bartick MC. et al. Effective communication about pregnancy, birth, lactation, breastfeeding and newborn care: the importance of sexed language. Front Glob Womens Health 2022; 3: 818856
• 11 Richardson SS. Sex Itself: The Search for Male and Female in the Human Genome. University of Chicago Press; 2019
• 12 Money J, Hampson JG, Hampson JL. An examination of some basic sexual concepts: the evidence of human hermaphroditism. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp 1955; 97 (04) 301-319
• 13 Butler J. Gender Trouble. Routledge; 1990
• 14 Rioux C, Paré A, London-Nadeau K. et al. Sex and gender terminology: a glossary for gender-sensitive epidemiology. J Epidemiol Community Health 2022; 76 (08) 764-768
• 15 Morrison T, Dinno A, Salmon T. The erasure of intersex, transgender, nonbinary, and agender experiences through misuse of sex and gender in health research. Am J Epidemiol 2021; 190 (12) 2712-2717
• 16 Wugalter K, Perovic M, Karkaby L, Einstein G. The double-edged sword of PCOS and gender: exploring gender-diverse experiences of polycystic ovary syndrome. Int J Transgender Health 2023; 1-17
• 17 Schweisberger CL, Hornberger L, Barral R. et al. Gender diversity in adolescents with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2022; 35 (11) 1422-1428
• 18 Teede H. International evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome 2023. Accessed August 9, 2023 at: https://www.monash.edu/medicine/mchri/pcos/guideline
• 19 Dinour LM. Speaking out on “breastfeeding” terminology: recommendations for gender-sensitive language in research and reporting. Breastfeed Med 2019; 14 (08) 523-532
• 20 Kinney R, Praamsma N, Malinowski A, Cassi P, Hennessy E. Testing inclusive language revisions of the breastfeeding attrition prediction tool using cognitive interviewing: a pilot study. J Hum Lact 2023; 39 (03) 529-539
• 21 Pendleton J. (En) Gendering the word ‘midwife’: semantics, etymology, and orientations. J Gend Stud 2022; 31 (05) 560-572
• 22 Hopper PJ, Traugott EC. Grammaticalization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1993
• 23 Silver A. Birth beyond the binary| AIMS. AIMS Journal. 2019; 31 (02) 15-18
• 24 Green H, Riddington A. Gender-Sensitive Language in Perinatal Services: Mission Statement and Rationale. Brighton & Sussex University Hospitals; 2020
• 25 Dahlen S. Do We Need the Word ‘Woman’ in Healthcare?. Oxford University Press; 2021: 483-484