Insights from a Decade of ‘Cutting Edge Research in Homeopathy’

References
1 Roberts ER, Mosley AJ, Tournier AL. HRI London 2023: the homeopathy research community reunites after a 4-year hiatus, sparking fresh collaborations between researchers ‘old and new’. Homeopathy 2024; 113: 49-52
2 London HRI. Cutting edge research in homeopathy. Presentation Abstracts. Homeopathy 2024; 113: A1-A26
3 Homeopathy Research Institute. HRI conferences. Accessed November 11, 2023 at: https://www.hri-research.org/resources/hri-conferences/
4 Mathie RT, Lloyd SM, Legg LA. et al. Randomised placebo-controlled trials of individualised homeopathic treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev 2014; 3: 142
5 Sigurdson MK, Sainani KL, Ioannidis JPA. Homeopathy can offer empirical insights on treatment effects in a null field. J Clin Epidemiol 2023; 155: 64-72
6 Ioannidis JP. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med 2005; 2: e124
7 Rosendaal FR, Bouter LM. Dwalingen in de methodologie (slot). XXXIX. De ultieme waarheid. [Errors in methodology (conclusion). XXXIX: The ultimate truth.] Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2002; 146: 304-309
8 Rutten L, Mathie RT, Fisher P, Goossens M, van Wassenhoven M. Plausibility and evidence: the case of homeopathy. Med Health Care Philos 2013; 16: 525-532
9 López-Carvallo JA, Mazón-Suástegui JM, Arcos-Ortega GF. et al. Highly diluted bioactive compounds in marine aquaculture: a potential alternative for sustainable production. Rev Aquacult 2021; 14: 1170-1193
10 Ücker A, Baumgartner S, Sokol A, Huber R, Doesburg P, Jäger T. Systematic review of plant-based homeopathic basic research: an update. Homeopathy 2018; 107: 115-129
11 Tournier A, Würtenberger S, Klein SD, Baumgartner S. Physicochemical Investigations of homeopathic preparations: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis—Part 3. J Altern Complement Med 2021; 27: 45-57
12 Mathie RT, Ramparsad N, Legg LA. et al. Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of non-individualised homeopathic treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev 2017; 6: 63
13 Homeopathy Research Institute. What scientific evidence is there that homeopathy works? Accessed November 20, 2023 at: https://www.hri-research.org/resources/homeopathy-faqs/scientific-evidence-for-homeopathy/
14 Jørgensen L, Paludan-Müller AS, Laursen DRT. et al. Evaluation of the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized clinical trials: overview of published comments and analysis of user practice in Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews. Syst Rev 2016; 5: 80
15 Howick J, Koletsi D, Ioannidis JPA. et al. Most healthcare interventions tested in Cochrane Reviews are not effective according to high quality evidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 2022; 148: 160-169
16 Fleming PS, Koletsi D, Ioannidis JPA, Pandis N. High quality of the evidence for medical and other health-related interventions was uncommon in Cochrane systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 2016; 78: 34-42