Open Access
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Clinical Interventional Radiology ISVIR 2024; 08(01): 011-021
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1775981
Original Article

Safety Profile of Intra-Arterial Tirofiban as a Rescue Therapy during Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke

1   Department of Interventional Radiology, Kovai Medical Center and Hospital, Coimbatore, Tami Nadu, India
,
Mathew Cherian
1   Department of Interventional Radiology, Kovai Medical Center and Hospital, Coimbatore, Tami Nadu, India
,
Pankaj Mehta
1   Department of Interventional Radiology, Kovai Medical Center and Hospital, Coimbatore, Tami Nadu, India
,
1   Department of Interventional Radiology, Kovai Medical Center and Hospital, Coimbatore, Tami Nadu, India
,
1   Department of Interventional Radiology, Kovai Medical Center and Hospital, Coimbatore, Tami Nadu, India
,
Anupchakravarthy Jayaraj
1   Department of Interventional Radiology, Kovai Medical Center and Hospital, Coimbatore, Tami Nadu, India
,
Shaheer Ali Palathingal
1   Department of Interventional Radiology, Kovai Medical Center and Hospital, Coimbatore, Tami Nadu, India
› Author Affiliations
Preview

Abstract

Purpose This article studies the safety profile and role of intra-arterial (IA) tirofiban as a rescue therapy in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy.

Methods This is a retrospective observational study conducted among AIS patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) eligible for endovascular revascularization and in whom IA tirofiban is given as rescue therapy. If the target vessel shows reocclusion following initial recanalization, flow limiting or significant residual stenosis after thrombectomy, or requires balloon angioplasty or stenting, IA tirofiban at a dose of 0.4 μg/kg/min was administered through the microcatheter in the target vessel followed by intravenous infusion of 0.1 μg/kg/min. The primary safety measure of the study was the incidence of symptomatic hemorrhage.

Results The total number of patients in the study group was 82, 36 were in the tirofiban group and 46 were in the non-tirofiban group. Immediate successful reperfusion was achieved in 31 patients (86.1%) and 41 patients (89%) in the tirofiban and non-tirofiban groups, respectively. Note that 19.4 and 25% of patients in the tirofiban group required adjunct techniques of angioplasty and stenting, respectively. Also, 2.7% patient in the tirofiban group had a symptomatic hemorrhage, while 8.7% in the non-tirofiban group had symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. On multinomial logistic regression, history of transient ischemic attack, truncal occlusion and watershed infarct pattern predicted the usage of IA tirofiban during mechanical thrombectomy.

Conclusion Usage of IA tirofiban with or without adjunct techniques as a rescue therapy during mechanical thrombectomy in LVO improved recanalization rates without increasing the risk of symptomatic hemorrhage.

Ethical approval

The study was conducted in the Department of Interventional Radiology, Kovai Medical Center and Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India, after approval by the local ethical and scientific committee.




Publication History

Article published online:
23 January 2024

© 2024. Indian Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India