Assessing the Accuracy of Common Clinical Tests for Detecting Palmaris Longus: A Prospective Study in a Tertiary Center

Abstract

Background Palmaris longus (PL) is a short-bellied muscle with a long tendon that merges with the palmar aponeurosis. It is supplied by the median nerve and acts as a tensor of the palmar aponeurosis and flexes the wrist. This tendon is commonly used for tendon transfers and as a donor for tendon graft. There are numerous clinical tests to detect the presence of PL like Schaeffer's test, Thompson's test, Mishra's test I, Mishra's test II, Pushpakumar's “two-finger sign” method, and AIIMS test. The principle of all these tests is to make the tendon prominent by eliciting its flexor action and then its identification by inspection and palpation.

Objectives The tests that are consistently easy to perform with good understandability would be easy to explain to the general population (patients). The aim of our study is to find out the accuracy and easy comprehensibility of various tests using compulsive postures for detecting PL tendon clinically.

Materials and Methods This is a prospective study on 137 participants. All the patients were subjected to six clinical tests to detect the presence or absence of PL tendon. The results were recorded for both hands by a single observer.

Results Of the 137 participants, 75 were males (54.74%) and 62 were females (45.26%). The mean age was 21 years. The AIIMS test showed the maximum number of tendons, that is, 113 (82.4%) in the right hand and 108 (78.8%) in the left hand. In view of the ability to comprehend the tests, 119 (86.9%) subjects understood Schaeffer's test very easily.

Conclusion According to this study, the AIIMS test best demonstrates the PL tendon, and Schaeffer's test was the test most easily understood by the subjects.

Keywords

palmaris longus - Schaeffer's test - AIIMS test - Mishra's test - Thompson's test - Pushpakumar's “two-finger sign” method - tendon transfer

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
25. September 2023

• References

• 1 Kigera JW, Mukwaya S. Clinical assessment of the palmaris longus: accuracy of common tests. Ann Afr Surg 2012; 9 (02) 104-107
• 2 Kigera JW, Mukwaya S. Frequency of agenesis palmaris longus through clinical examination: an East African study. PLoS One 2011; 6 (12) e28997
• 3 Mugalur A, Shahane SM, Samant A, Pathak AC, Patil A, Reddy R. Anatomic variation of palmaris longus and flexor digitorum superficialis of little finger in Indian population. SICOT J 2015; 1-5
• 4 Schaeffer JP. On the variations of the palmaris longus muscle. Anat Rec 1909; 3: 275-278
• 5 Shenoy RM. Two new clinical tests for palmaris longus. Indian J Plast Surg 2018; 51 (03) 321-323
• 6 Pushpakumar SB, Hanson RP, Carroll S. The “two finger” sign. Clinical examination of palmaris longus (PL) tendon. Br J Plast Surg 2004; 57 (02) 184-185
• 7 Machhindra MV, Garg B, Tiwari V, Kotwal P. AIIMS test: a simple test to look for presence of palmaris longus. Musculoskelet Surg 2015; 99 (02) 155-158
• 8 Johnson CC, Zusstone E, Miller TT, Nwawka OK, Lee SK, Wolfe SW. Clinical tests for assessing the presence and quality of the palmaris longus tendon: diagnostic accuracy of examination compared with ultrasound. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2020; 45 (03) 292-298
• 9 Alves N, Ramírez D, Deana NF. Study of frequency of the palmaris longus muscle in Chilean subjects. Int J Morphol 2011; 29 (02) 485-489
• 10 Hiz Ö, Ediz L, Ceylan MF, Gezici E, Gülcü E, Erden M. Prevalence of the absence of palmaris longus muscle assessed by a new examination test (Hiz-Ediz test) in the population residing in the area of Van, Turkey. J Clin Exp Investig 2011; 2 (03) 254-259
• 11 Erić M, Koprivčić I, Vučinić N. et al. Prevalence of the palmaris longus in relation to the hand dominance. Surg Radiol Anat 2011; 33 (06) 481-484