J Wrist Surg 2024; 13(05): 406-420
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1773777
Scientific Article

Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Denervation for Early Osteoarthritis: An Overview of the Literature and a Pilot Study on Pain Reduction and Patient Satisfaction

Merel J.-L. Berkhout*
1   Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Handsurgery, Alrijne Hospital, Leiden, The Netherlands
2   The Hand Clinic, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
Sophie R.M. Bosch*
3   Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, The Netherlands
,
Marco J.P.F. Ritt
2   The Hand Clinic, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
3   Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, The Netherlands
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Background The treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint (CMC-I) aims at pain reduction to improve hand function and quality of life. The CMC-I denervation procedure is relatively new and seems appealing, as it is minimally invasive and has few or no disadvantages. To date, however, little research has been done on the results of a CMC-I denervation. The aim of this study was to investigate whether denervation provides pain reduction in patients with early CMC-I osteoarthritis.

Methods A literature search was done using PubMed. Studies were excluded if access to full text was not available, if the articles were written in other languages than Dutch or English, and if preoperative testing, follow-up testing, or reporting were incomplete. Studies were included if patients were older than 18 years, had primary CMC-I osteoarthritis with no other wrist pathology, and had received conservative treatment without sustained benefit. The Critical Appraisal Tools of the Joanna Briggs Institute were used for critical appraisal.

Clinical data was gathered retrospectively from the medical records to identify patients who underwent CMC-I denervation in The Hand Clinic, Amsterdam. The data of 20 patients were analyzed. Pre- and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores on pain, patient satisfaction, and complications were evaluated. Patients older than 18 years with primary CMC-I osteoarthritis stage I and II and no other wrist pathology, in whom conservative treatment failed were included in the study. Patients with CMC-I osteoarthritis stage III and IV were excluded.

Results All 17 search results were screened for full text access, after which 6 case series, 4 systematic reviews, 1 cohort study, 1 comment, and 1 scoping review was included. All but one study showed pain reduction after surgery. In half of the studies, this difference was statistically significant. The average patient satisfaction in these studies was 84.1% and the complication rate was 13.4%.

A total of 20 patients were included between 2019 and 2022, with a mean preoperative VAS for pain at rest of 48.2 ± 29.9. After surgery, this decreased to 35.8 ± 34.1. This difference was not statistically significant. The mean VAS for pain during use before denervation was 79 ± 18.4 and this decreased to 49.8 ± 34.2 postoperatively. This difference did appear to be statistically significant. The average patient satisfaction was 60%, and the complication rate was 10%.

Conclusion This study provides a literature overview and a pilot study on pain reduction, patient satisfaction, and complications after denervation of the CMC-I joint in patients with early osteoarthritis. Our retrospective case series roughly mirrored the average results found in the literature. There was a statistically significant decrease in pain during use postoperatively. There was no statistically significant difference in pain at rest before and after surgery. The complications were mild and the complication rate was low; however, the average patient satisfaction rate was lower as compared to that reported in the literature.

Location

The work was performed at the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam UMC and at The Hand Clinic, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.


* These authors have, contributed equally to this article.




Publication History

Received: 06 February 2023

Accepted: 18 July 2023

Article published online:
13 September 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Wilder FV, Barrett JP, Farina EJ. Joint-specific prevalence of osteoarthritis of the hand. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2006; 14 (09) 953-957
  • 2 Wajon A, Vinycomb T, Carr E, Edmunds I, Ada L. WITHDRAWN: surgery for thumb (trapeziometacarpal joint) osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 4 (04) CD004631
  • 3 Teo I, Riley N. Thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis: is there a role for denervation? A systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2020; 73 (07) 1208-1220
  • 4 Tieman TE, Duraku LS, van der Oest MJW, Hundepool CA, Selles RW, Zuidam JM. Denervation of the joints of the hand and wrist: surgical techniques and a systematic review with meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021; 148 (06) 959e-972e
  • 5 Ehrl D, Erne HC, Broer PN, Metz C, Falter E. Painful thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis: results of a novel treatment approach. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2016; 69 (07) 972-976
  • 6 Munn Z, Barker T, Moola S. et al. Methodological quality of case series studies: an introduction to the JBI critical appraisal tool. JBI Evid Synthesis 2020; 18 (10) 2127-2133
  • 7 Aromataris E, Fernandez R, Godfrey CM, Holly C, Khalil H, Tungpunkom P. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach. Int J Evid-Based Healthc 2015; 13 (03) 132-140
  • 8 Moola S, Munn Z, Sears K. et al. Conducting systematic reviews of association (etiology): the Joanna Briggs Institute's approach. Int J Evid-Based Healthc 2015; 13 (03) 163-169
  • 9 McArthur A, Klugárová J, Yan H, Florescu S. Innovations in the systematic review of text and opinion. Int J Evid-Based Healthc 2015; 13 (03) 188-195
  • 10 Spielman AF, Sankaranarayanan S, Lessard AS. Joint preserving treatments for thumb CMC arthritis. Hand Clin 2022; 38 (02) 169-181
  • 11 Stögner VA, Krezdorn N, Vogt PM. Comment on: “Thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis: is there a role for denervation? A systematic review.”. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021; 74 (05) 1101-1160
  • 12 Arenas-Prat J. Denervation with periosteal resection of the first carpometacarpal joint. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 2022; 26 (04) 229-231
  • 13 Arenas-Prat JM. Wagner approach for first carpometacarpal joint denervation. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 2012; 16 (02) 107-109
  • 14 Giesen T, Klein HJ, Franchi A, Medina JA, Elliot D. Thumb carpometacarpal joint denervation for primary osteoarthritis: a prospective study of 31 thumbs. Hand Surg Rehabil 2017; 36 (03) 192-197
  • 15 Zhu SL, Chin B, Sarraj M, Wang E, Dunn EE, McRae MC. Denervation as a treatment for arthritis of the hands: a systematic review of the current literature. Hand (N Y) 2023; 18 (02) 183-191
  • 16 Donato D, Abunimer AM, Abou-Al-Shaar H, Willcockson J, Frazer L, Mahan MA. First carpometacarpal joint denervation for primary osteoarthritis: technique and outcomes. World Neurosurg 2019; 122: e1374-e1380
  • 17 Salibi A, Hilliam R, Burke FD, Heras-Palou C. Prospective clinical trial comparing trapezial denervation with trapeziectomy for the surgical treatment of arthritis at the base of the thumb. J Surg Res 2019; 238: 144-151
  • 18 Rezzadeh K, Rossi K, Trerotola CC, Shah A. First carpometacarpal joint denervation: a systematic review. J Hand Surg Am 2022; 47 (08) 793.e1-793.e8
  • 19 Ehrl D, Erne HC, Broer PN, Metz C, Falter E. Outcomes of denervation, joint lavage and capsular imbrication for painful thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2016; 41 (09) 904-909
  • 20 Murphy M, Sternschuss G, Haff R, van Raalte H, Saltz S, Lucente V. Quality of life and surgical satisfaction after vaginal reconstructive vs obliterative surgery for the treatment of advanced pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 198 (05) 573.e1-573.e7
  • 21 Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML. et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 2009; 250 (02) 187-196