Download PDF
CC BY 4.0 · The Arab Journal of Interventional Radiology 2023; 07(02): 094-099
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1771331
Original Article

The Impact of a Hands-On Interventional Radiology Training Course on Radiology Resident's Training: A Single Academic Institution Experience

Nicholas Guimbarda
1   Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, United States
,
Hashim Armashi
2   Department of Radiology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, United States
,
William Parker
2   Department of Radiology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, United States
3   Neuroradiology Section, Department of Radiology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, United States
,
Arthur Freedman
2   Department of Radiology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, United States
4   Interventional Radiology Section, Department of Radiology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, United States
,
Islam A.S. Elhelf
2   Department of Radiology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, United States
4   Interventional Radiology Section, Department of Radiology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, United States
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this study was to investigate the outcomes of an instructional hands-on training course that introduces radiology residents to the essential tools and skills needed to perform basic interventional radiology (IR) procedures.

Materials and Methods This study was performed over a single academic year at a single academic institution. A precourse survey was sent to all radiology residents to identify areas of weakness and potential opportunities for improvement. In view of the responses, a hands-on training course was designed to cover the basics of vascular and soft-tissue access, catheters, wires, embolics, and closure devices. The training was provided in a one-to-one setting by a single IR attending over a period of 45 minutes and was concluded with hands-on training on an ultrasound (US) vascular access phantom whenever possible. An anonymous postcourse survey was then distributed and the results were analyzed.

Results The average reported comfort level with basic IR concepts prior to course attendance was 1.7 on a 5-point scale (1 = not comfortable, 5 = very comfortable). This increased to an average of 4 following the course. Ninety-three percent of residents reported they have more confidence getting into the IR suite and assisting in IR procedures following the course. Residents who had an opportunity to train on the US vascular access phantom gave an average response of 4.6 out of 5 to a question of how helpful the experience was in improving their US hand skills (1 = not helpful, 5 = extremely helpful). One hundred percent of responders reported that the course successfully met its goal. Finally, the overall responses were unanimously in favor of continuing the hands-on training course.

Conclusion A personalized, cost-effective, hands-on training course can improve the IR training experience of radiology residents, especially in the early training phase. This model is of particular value for smaller to medium-sized academic institutions with limited financial and educational resources.

Keywords

interventional radiology residents - radiology training - training course


Publication History

Article published online:
04 September 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Khaja MS, Jo A, Sherk WM. et al. Perspective on the new IR residency selection process: 4-year experience at a large, collaborative training program. Acad Radiol 2022; 29 (03) 469-472
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Chapman T, Chew FS. Introductory lecture series for first-year radiology residents: implementation, investment and assessment. Acad Radiol 2013; 20 (03) 332-337
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Colucci PG, Gao MA, Schweitzer AD. et al. A novel hands-on approach towards teaching diagnostic radiology residents MRI scanning and physics. Acad Radiol 2023; 30 (05) 998-1004
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Mukund A, Bhardwaj K, Mohan C. basic interventional procedures: practice essentials. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2019; 29 (02) 182-189
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Findeiss LK, Everett C, Azene E. et al. Interventional radiology workforce shortages affecting small and rural practices: a report of the SIR/ACR Joint Task Force on recruitment and retention of interventional radiologists to small and rural practices. J Am Coll Radiol 2022; 19 (12) 1322-1335
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Siragusa DA, Cardella JF, Hieb RA. et al; Society of Interventional Radiology. Requirements for training in interventional radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2013; 24 (11) 1609-1612
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Nesbitt CI, Tingle SJ, Williams R. et al. Educational impact of a pulsatile human cadaver circulation model for endovascular training. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2019; 58 (04) 602-608
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Mirza S, Athreya S. Review of simulation training in interventional radiology. Acad Radiol 2018; 25 (04) 529-539
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Sekhar A, Sun MR, Siewert B. A tissue phantom model for training residents in ultrasound-guided liver biopsy. Acad Radiol 2014; 21 (07) 902-908
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Minocha J, Yaghmai V, Hammond N, Pyrros AT, Nikolaidis P. Cardiac imaging training in radiology residency programs: a survey of radiology chief residents. Acad Radiol 2010; 17 (06) 795-798
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar