Download PDF
CC BY 4.0 · European Journal of General Dentistry 2023; 12(02): 115-120
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1770987
Original Article

Evaluation and Perception of an Edpuzzle Class Compared with a Traditional Class among Oral Radiology Undergraduate Students

Ebtihal Habeeb Zain-Alabdeen 
1   Department of Oral Clinical and Basic Sciences, College of Dentistry, Taibah University, Almadinah Almunawwarah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objectives Dental students are to an increasing extent presented with new digital learning technologies, especially online delivery of class content. Edpuzzle is a web-based eLearning application that allows educators to select subject-related videos and customize them by editing, cropping, voice-over recording, and adding questions directly to the video stream. Under the teacher's guidance, students log into Edpuzzle using their iPads, take the class, and answer questions. The aim of this study was to compare an Edpuzzle class with a traditional class for undergraduate oral radiology students in order to evaluate the educational effectiveness of each teaching method.

Materials and Methods The study sample comprised 20 fourth-year dental students who agreed to participate in the study. A traditional class developed a differential diagnosis topic with pre- and post-knowledge tests. A second differential diagnosis topic was developed for an Edpuzzle class, also with a pre- and post-knowledge test. After the two classes were given, a Google Forms feedback questionnaire was sent to the students to evaluate their perceptions and preferences regarding the two classes. The educational effectiveness of each class type was evaluated by comparing means and analyzing the feedback questionnaires.

Statistical Analysis The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to examine pre- and post-knowledge for each class, and Welch's t-test was used to test for differences in means of post-knowledge of both classes.

Results Students in both classes obtained significantly better scores in the posttest than they did in the pretest (p = 0.0001). However, the differences in means of post-knowledge of both classes showed no significant differences (p = 0.0975). The feedback questionnaire showed higher percentages of positive attitude toward Edpuzzle class.

Conclusion As a first-time experience, the Edpuzzle class interested most of the students. Workshops for the staff are needed to become expert in these technologies and to overcome any obstacles in implementing them for undergraduate dental students.

Keywords

Edpuzzle - dental - radiology - blended learning - undergraduate - videos - computer-aided instruction


Publication History

Article published online:
11 September 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 El Khateeb SM, Abu-Hammad O, Fadel H, Dar-Odeh N. A retrospective analysis of radiographic jaw findings in young women; prevalence and predictors. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2017; 7 (01) 22-27
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Scarsbrook AF, Foley PT, Perriss RW, Graham RN. Radiological digital teaching file development: an overview. Clin Radiol 2005; 60 (08) 831-837
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Santos GNM, Leite AF, Figueiredo PT. et al. Effectiveness of E-learning in oral radiology education: a systematic review. J Dent Educ 2016; 80 (09) 1126-1139
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Gutmark R, Halsted MJ, Perry L, Gold G. Use of computer databases to reduce radiograph reading errors. J Am Coll Radiol 2007; 4 (01) 65-68
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Zain-Alabdeen EH, Al-Sadhan RI, AlSuhaim FS, AlMutairi KM. Delayed diagnosis in the maxillofacial region: two case reports. J Taibah Univ Med Sci 2017; 12 (06) 548-554
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Schönwetter DJ, Reynolds PA, Eaton KA, De Vries J. Online learning in dentistry: an overview of the future direction for dental education. J Oral Rehabil 2010; 37 (12) 927-940
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Tan PL, Hay DB, Whaites E. Implementing e-learning in a radiological science course in dental education: a short-term longitudinal study. J Dent Educ 2009; 73 (10) 1202-1212
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Brumini G, Špalj S, Mavrinac M, Biočina-Lukenda D, Strujić M, Brumini M. Attitudes towards e-learning amongst dental students at the universities in Croatia. Eur J Dent Educ 2014; 18 (01) 15-23
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Kavadella A, Tsiklakis K, Vougiouklakis G, Lionarakis A. Evaluation of a blended learning course for teaching oral radiology to undergraduate dental students. Eur J Dent Educ 2012; 16 (01) e88-e95
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Holmström A, Ahonen S-M. Radiography students' learning: a literature review. Radiol Technol 2016; 87 (04) 371-379
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Hillenburg KL, Cederberg RA, Gray SA, Hurst CL, Johnson GK, Potter BJ. E-learning and the future of dental education: opinions of administrators and information technology specialists. Eur J Dent Educ 2006; 10 (03) 169-177
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Wertz CI, Hobbs DL, Mickelsen W. Integrating technology into radiologic science education. Radiol Technol 2014; 86 (01) 23-31
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Zain-Alabdeen EH. Perspectives of undergraduate oral radiology students on flipped classroom learning. Saudi J Health Sci 2017; 6 (03) 135-139
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Al-Rawi WT, Jacobs R, Hassan BA, Sanderink G, Scarfe WC. Evaluation of web-based instruction for anatomical interpretation in maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2007; 36 (08) 459-464
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Pahinis K, Stokes CW, Walsh TF, Tsitrou E, Cannavina G. A blended learning course taught to different groups of learners in a dental school: follow-up evaluation. J Dent Educ 2008; 72 (09) 1048-1057
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Fu MW, Kalaichelvan A, Liebman LS, Burns LE. Exploring predoctoral dental student use of YouTube as a learning tool for clinical endodontic procedures. J Dent Educ 2022; 86 (06) 726-735
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Garrison DR, Kanuka H. Blended learning: uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet High Educ 2004; 7 (02) 95-105
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Cesare DMD, Kaczorowski T, Hashey A. A piece of the (Ed) Puzzle: using the Edpuzzle interactive video platform to facilitate explicit instruction. J Special Edu Technol 2021; 36 (02) 77-83
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Littlefield A. Increasing cognitive thinking skills with Edpuzzle. Nurse Educ 2019; 44 (02) 78
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Shelby SJ, Fralish ZD. Using Edpuzzle to improve student experience and performance in the biochemistry laboratory. Biochem Mol Biol Educ 2021; 49 (04) 529-534
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Neuhaus KW, Schegg R, Krastl G, Amato M, Weiger R, Walter C. Integrated learning in dentistry: baseline data and first evaluation at the Dental School of Basel. Eur J Dent Educ 2008; 12 (03) 163-169
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Woltering V, Herrler A, Spitzer K, Spreckelsen C. Blended learning positively affects students' satisfaction and the role of the tutor in the problem-based learning process: results of a mixed-method evaluation. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2009; 14 (05) 725-738
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Kaur M. Blended learning-its challenges and future. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 2013; 93: 612-617
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Meckfessel S, Stühmer C, Bormann K-H. et al. Introduction of e-learning in dental radiology reveals significantly improved results in final examination. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2011; 39 (01) 40-48
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Utts J, Sommer B, Acredolo C, Maher MW, Matthews HR. A study comparing traditional and hybrid internet-based instruction in introductory statistics classes. J Stat Educ 2003;11(03):0691898.2003.11910722
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Hudson JN. Computer-aided learning in the real world of medical education: does the quality of interaction with the computer affect student learning?. Med Educ 2004; 38 (08) 887-895
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Vichitvejpaisal P, Sitthikongsak S, Preechakoon B. et al. Does computer-assisted instruction really help to improve the learning process?. Med Educ 2001; 35 (10) 983-989
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Howlett D, Vincent T, Watson G. et al. Blending online techniques with traditional face to face teaching methods to deliver final year undergraduate radiology learning content. Eur J Radiol 2011; 78 (03) 334-341
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Dar-Odeh N, Babkair H, Alnazzawi A, Abu-Hammad S, Abu-Hammad A, Abu-Hammad O. Utilization of teledentistry in antimicrobial prescribing and diagnosis of infectious diseases during COVID-19 lockdown. Eur J Dent 2020; 14 (S 01): S20-S26
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar