RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1769487
Ghost Ileostomy Release Down-Our Initial Experience
Autor*innen
Funding Information This research project didn't receive any grants from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Abstract
Background Many publications describe the advantages of the creation of ghost ileostomy (GI) to prevent the need for formal covering ileostomy in more than 80% of carcinoma rectum patients. However, none of the papers describes exactly how to ultimately remove the GI in these 80% of patients in whom it doesn't need formal maturation.
Aim To describe and evaluate the ghost ileostomy release down (GIRD) technique in terms of feasibility, complications, hospital stay, procedure time etc. in patients with low anterior resection/ultra-low anterior resection (LAR/uLAR) with GI for carcinoma rectum.
Method The present was a prospective cohort study of patients with restorative colorectal resections with GI for carcinoma rectum, Postoperatively the patients were studied with respect to ease and feasibility of the release down of GI and its complications. The data was collected, analyzed and inference drawn.
Results A total of 26 patients needed the GIRD and were included in the final statistical analysis of the study. The procedure was done between 7th to 16th postoperative days (POD) and was successful in all patients without the need of any additional surgical procedure. None of the patients required any local anesthetic injection or any extra analgesics. The average time taken for procedure was 5-minutes and none of the patients had any significant difficulty in GI release. There were no immediate postprocedure complications.
Conclusion The GIRD technique is a simple, safe, and quick procedure done around the 10th POD that can easily be performed by the bedside of patient without the need of any anesthesia or additional analgesics.
Author Contribution
All authors have contributed equally to the preparation of this article.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 09. Dezember 2022
Angenommen: 07. März 2023
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
23. Juni 2023
© 2023. Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
-
References
- 1 Enker WE. Total mesorectal excision–the new golden standard of surgery for rectal cancer. Ann Med 1997; 29 (02) 127-133
- 2 Heald RJ, Moran BJ, Ryall RDH, Sexton R, MacFarlane JK. Rectal cancer: the Basingstoke experience of total mesorectal excision, 1978-1997. Arch Surg 1998; 133 (08) 894-899
- 3 Kapiteijn E, Marijnen CAM, Nagtegaal ID. et al; Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2001; 345 (09) 638-646
- 4 Griffen FD, Knight Sr CD, Whitaker JM, Knight Jr CD. The double stapling technique for low anterior resection. Results, modifications, and observations. Ann Surg 1990; 211 (06) 745-751 , discussion 751–752
- 5 Mehraj A, Chowdri NA, Nanda S. et al. Validity of APR in the Era of Sphincter Saving Procedures for Low Rectal Cancers. EC Gastroenterology and Digestive System 2018; 5 (03) 152-159
- 6 Chude GG, Rayate NV, Patris V. et al. Defunctioning loop ileostomy with low anterior resection for distal rectal cancer: should we make an ileostomy as a routine procedure? A prospective randomized study. Hepatogastroenterology 2008; 55 (86-87): 1562-1567
- 7 Tan WS, Tang CL, Shi L, Eu KW. Meta-analysis of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2009; 96 (05) 462-472
- 8 Matthiessen P, Hallböök O, Rutegård J, Simert G, Sjödahl R. Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg 2007; 246 (02) 207-214
- 9 Bakx R, Busch OR, Bemelman WA, Veldink GJ, Slors JF, van Lanschot JJ. Morbidity of temporary loop ileostomies. Dig Surg 2004; 21 (04) 277-281 [PMID: 15308867 DOI: 10.1159/000080201]
- 10 Cipe G, Erkek B, Kuzu A, Gecim E. Morbidity and mortality after the closure of a protective loop ileostomy: analysis of possible predictors. Hepatogastroenterology 2012; 59 (119) 2168-2172 [PMID: 22440245 DOI: 10.5754/hge12115]
- 11 Hallböök O, Matthiessen P, Leinsköld T, Nyström PO, Sjödahl R. Safety of the temporary loop ileostomy. Colorectal Dis 2002; 4 (05) 361-364 [PMID: 12780582]
- 12 Kaiser AM, Israelit S, Klaristenfeld D. et al. Morbidity of ostomy takedown. J Gastrointest Surg 2008; 12 (03) 437-441 [PMID: 18095033 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-007-0457-8]
- 13 Laurent C, Nobili S, Rullier A, Vendrely V, Saric J, Rullier E. Efforts to improve local control in rectal cancer compromise survival by the potential morbidity of optimal mesorectal excision. J Am Coll Surg 2006; 203 (05) 684-691 [PMID: 17084330 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.07.021]
- 14 Law WL, Chu KW, Choi HK. Randomized clinical trial comparing loop ileostomy and loop transverse colostomy for faecal diversion following total mesorectal excision. Br J Surg 2002; 89 (06) 704-708 [PMID: 12027979 DOI: 10.1046/ j.1365-2168.2002.02082.x]
- 15 van Westreenen HL, Visser A, Tanis PJ, Bemelman WA. Morbidity related to defunctioning ileostomy closure after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and low colonic anastomosis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2012; 27 (01) 49-54 [PMID: 21761119 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-011-1276-7]
- 16 Åkesson O, Syk I, Lindmark G, Buchwald P. Morbidity related to defunctioning loop ileostomy in low anterior resection. Int J Colorectal Dis 2012; 27 (12) 1619-1623
- 17 Floodeen H, Lindgren R, Matthiessen P. When are defunctioning stomas in rectal cancer surgery really reversed? Results from a population-based single center experience. Scand J Surg 2013; 102 (04) 246-250
- 18 Lindgren R, Hallböök O, Rutegård J, Sjödahl R, Matthiessen P. What is the risk for a permanent stoma after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer? A six-year follow-up of a multicenter trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54 (01) 41-47
- 19 Khan MA, Chowdri NA, Wani RA. et al. Technique of Ghost (Khatith) Ileostomy: Our Experience and Guidelines. Ann Colorectal Res. 2021; 9 (02) 51-57
- 20 Miccini M, Amore Bonapasta S, Gregori M, Barillari P, Tocchi A. Ghost ileostomy: real and potential advantages. Am J Surg 2010; 200 (04) e55-e57
- 21 Sacchi M, Legge PD, Picozzi P, Papa F, Giovanni CL, Greco L. Virtual ileostomy following TME and primary sphincter-saving reconstruction for rectal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 2007; 54 (78) 1676-1678
- 22 Flor-Lorente B, Sánchez-Guillén L, Pellino G. et al. “Virtual ileostomy” combined with early endoscopy to avoid a diversion ileostomy in low or ultralow colorectal anastomoses. A preliminary report. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2019; 404 (03) 375-383
- 23 Edge SB, Compton CC. The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol 2010; 17 (06) 1471-1474
- 24 Pakkastie TE, Ovaska JT, Pekkala ES, Luukkonen PE, Järvinen HJ. A randomised study of colostomies in low colorectal anastomoses. Eur J Surg 1997; 163 (12) 929-933
- 25 Hautefeuille P, Valleur P, Perniceni T. et al. Functional and oncologic results after coloanal anastomosis for low rectal carcinoma. Ann Surg 1988; 207 (01) 61-64
- 26 Shiomi A, Ito M, Maeda K. et al. Effects of a diverting stoma on symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis of 1,014 consecutive patients. J Am Coll Surg 2015; 220 (02) 186-194
- 27 Gullà N, Trastulli S, Boselli C. et al. Ghost ileostomy after anterior resection for rectal cancer: a preliminary experience. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2011; 396 (07) 997-1007
- 28 Mori L, Vita M, Razzetta F, Meinero P, D'Ambrosio G. Ghost ileostomy in anterior resection for rectal carcinoma: is it worthwhile?. Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56 (01) 29-34
- 29 Khan MA, Chowdri NA, Parray FQ. et al. Role of ghost ileostomy in low anterior resection for carcinoma rectum. ANZ J Surg 2021; 91 (05) 1039-1039
- 30 Ambe PC, Zirngibl H, Möslein G. Routine Virtual Ileostomy Following Restorative Proctocolectomy for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis. World J Surg 2018; 42 (06) 1867-1871
- 31 Lago V, Domingo S, Matute L, Padilla P, Flor B, García-Granero Á. Ghost ileostomy in advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2017; 147 (02) 488
- 32 Mari FS, Di Cesare T, Novi L. et al. Does ghost ileostomy have a role in the laparoscopic rectal surgery era? A randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2015; 29 (09) 2590-2597
