RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1768672
Who is in the emergency room matters when we talk about door-to-needle time: a single-center experience
Quien está en el servicio de emergencia importa al hablar de tiempo puerta-aguja: experiencia de un centro clínico
Abstract
Background The efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is time-dependent.
Objective To compare the door-to-needle (DTN) time of stroke neurologists (SNs) versus non-stroke neurologists (NSNs) and emergency room physicians (EPs). Additionally, we aimed to determine elements associated with DTN ≤ 20 minutes.
Methods Prospective study of patients with IVT treated at Clínica Alemana between June 2016 and September 2021.
Results A total of 301 patients underwent treatment for IVT. The mean DTN time was 43.3 ± 23.6 minutes. One hundred seventy-three (57.4%) patients were evaluated by SNs, 122 (40.5%) by NSNs, and 6 (2.1%) by EPs. The mean DTN times were 40.8 ± 23, 46 ± 24.7, and 58 ± 22.5 minutes, respectively. Door-to-needle time ≤ 20 minutes occurred more frequently when patients were treated by SNs compared to NSNs and EPs: 15%, 4%, and 0%, respectively (odds ratio [OR]: 4.3, 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.66–11.5, p = 0.004). In univariate analysis DTN time ≤ 20 minutes was associated with treatment by a SN (p = 0.002), coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic period (p = 0.21), time to emergency room (ER) (p = 0.21), presence of diabetes (p = 0.142), hypercholesterolemia (p = 0.007), atrial fibrillation (p < 0.09), score on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) (p = 0.001), lower systolic (p = 0.143) and diastolic (p = 0.21) blood pressures, the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS; p = 0.09), vessel occlusion (p = 0.05), use of tenecteplase (p = 0.18), thrombectomy (p = 0.13), and years of experience of the physician (p < 0.001). After multivariate analysis, being treated by a SN (OR: 3.95; 95%CI: 1.44–10.8; p = 0.007), NIHSS (OR: 1.07; 95%CI: 1.02–1.12; p < 0.002) and lower systolic blood pressure (OR: 0.98; 95%CI: 0.96–0.99; p < 0.003) remained significant.
Conclusion Treatment by a SN resulted in a higher probability of treating the patient in a DTN time within 20 minutes.
Resumen
Antecedentes La respuesta a la trombólisis intravenosa (TIV) es dependiente del tiempo.
Objectivo Comparar los tiempo puerta-aguja (TPAs) de neurólogos vasculares (NVs) contra los de neurólogos no vasculares (NNVs) y médicos emergencistas (MEs), y determinar los elementos asociados a un PTA ≤ 20 minutos.
Métodos Análisis observacional prospectivo de pacientes con TIV tratados en Clínica Alemana entre junio de 2016 y septiembre de 2021.
Resultados En total, 301 pacientes con TIV fueron tratados. El TPA promedio fue de 43,3 ± 23,6 minutos. Un total de 173 (57,4%) pacientes fueron evaluados por NVs, 122 (40,5%), por NNVs, y 6 (2,1%), por MEs; los TPAs promedios fueron de 40,8 ± 23; 46 ± 24,7 y 58 ± 22,5 minutos, respectivamente. Los TPAs ≤ 20 minutos fueron más frecuentes en pacientes tratados por NVs versus NNVs y MEs: 15%, 4% y 0%, respectivamente (odds ratio [OR]: 4,3; intervalo de confianza del 95% [IC95%]: 1,66–11,5; p = 0,004). El análisis univariado demostró que TPA ≤ 20 minutos se asoció con: tratamiento por NVs (p = 0,002), periodo de la pandemia de enfermedad por coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19; p = 0,21), tiempo a urgencia (p = 0,21), diabetes (p = 0,142), hipercolesterolemia (p = 0,007), fibrilación auricular (p < 0,09), puntaje en la National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] (p = 0,001), presión arterial sistólica (p = 0,143) y diastólica menores (p = 0,21), Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS ; p = 0,09), oclusión de vasos cerebrales (p =0,05), uso de tecneteplase (p = 0,18), trombectomía (p = 0,13) y años de experiencia del médico (p < 0,001). El análisis multivariado demostró que ser tratado por NVs (OR: 3,95; IC95%: 1,44–10,8; p = 0,007), el puntaje en la NIHSS (OR: 1,07; IC95%: 1,02–1,12; p < 0,002) y la presión arterial sistólica (OR: 0,98; IC95%: 0,96–0,99; p < 0,003) se asociaron a TPA ≤ 20 minutos.
Conclusión El tratamiento por NVs resultó en un TPA menor y en una mayor probabilidad de tratamiento ≤ 20 minutos.
Palabras clave
Accidente Cerebrovascular - Tiempo de Lisis del Coágulo de Fibrina - Terapia TrombolíticaAuthors' Contributions
AB, PL, VO, PM, EM, JCN: Conceptualization, data curation, investigation, and methodology. AB, GC: Formal analysis of data; AB, PL, EM, VO, PM, JC, GC: Writing – original draft, writing – review & editing.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 16. November 2022
Angenommen: 15. März 2023
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
04. Juli 2023
© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
-
References
- 1 Emberson J, Lees KR, Lyden P. et al; Stroke Thrombolysis Trialists' Collaborative Group. Effect of treatment delay, age, and stroke severity on the effects of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. Lancet 2014; 384 (9958): 1929-1935
- 2 Qin B, Zhao M-J, Chen H. et al. Real-World Outcomes of Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment with Intravenous Thrombolysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2018; 27 (12) 3542-3548
- 3 Whiteley WN, Emberson J, Lees KR. et al; Stroke Thrombolysis Trialists' Collaboration. Risk of intracerebral haemorrhage with alteplase after acute ischaemic stroke: a secondary analysis of an individual patient data meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol 2016; 15 (09) 925-933
- 4 Saver JL, Fonarow GC, Smith EE. et al. Time to treatment with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and outcome from acute ischemic stroke. JAMA 2013; 309 (23) 2480-2488
- 5 Meretoja A, Strbian D, Mustanoja S, Tatlisumak T, Lindsberg PJ, Kaste M. Reducing in-hospital delay to 20 minutes in stroke thrombolysis. Neurology 2012; 79 (04) 306-313
- 6 Lee A, Gaekwad A, Bronca M. et al. Stroke physician versus stroke neurologist: can anyone thrombolyse?. Intern Med J 2015; 45 (03) 305-309
- 7 Brunser AM, Cavada G, Venturelli PM. et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging determinants for acute ischemic stroke diagnosis in the emergency room. Neuroradiology 2018; 60 (07) 687-692
- 8 Saver JL. Time is brain–quantified. Stroke 2006; 37 (01) 263-266
- 9 Mikulík R, Bar M, Bělašková S. et al; Czech Stroke Unit Network. Ultrashort Door-to-Needle Time for Intravenous Thrombolysis Is Safer and Improves Outcome in the Czech Republic: Nationwide Study 2004 to 2019. J Am Heart Assoc 2022; 11 (10) e023524
- 10 Yafasova A, Fosbøl EL, Johnsen SP. et al. Time to Thrombolysis and Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Nationwide Study. Stroke 2021; 52 (05) 1724-1732
- 11 Mackey J, Yamal JM, Parker SA. et al; BEST-MSU Study Group. Golden Hour Treatment With tPA (Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator) in the BEST-MSU Study. Stroke 2023; 54 (02) 415-425
- 12 Fonarow GC, Smith EE, Saver JL. et al. Improving door-to-needle times in acute ischemic stroke: the design and rationale for the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association's Target: Stroke initiative. Stroke 2011; 42 (10) 2983-2989
- 13 Bates TR, Boudville AC, Ghia DK, Kho LK, Silbert PL, Lee M. Stroke physician versus stroke neurologist: can anyone thrombolyse? A general hospital experience and perspective. Intern Med J 2015; 45 (09) 987-988
- 14 Bhatt A, Shatila A. Neurohospitalists Improve Door-to-Needle Times for Patients With Ischemic Stroke Receiving Intravenous tPA. Neurohospitalist 2012; 2 (04) 119-122
- 15 Mansilla E, Mazzon E, Cárcamo D. et al. Telestroke en Chile: resultados de 1 año de experiencia de la Unidad de TeleACV del Servicio de Salud Metropolitano Sur en 7 hospitales ejecutores. [Telestroke in Chile: 1 year experience at 7 hospitals] Rev Med Chil 2019; 147 (09) 1107-1113
- 16 Heikkilä I, Kuusisto H, Stolberg A, Palomäki A. Stroke thrombolysis given by emergency physicians cuts in-hospital delays significantly immediately after implementing a new treatment protocol. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2016; 24: 46
- 17 Man S, Xian Y, Holmes DN. et al. Association Between Thrombolytic Door-to-Needle Time and 1-Year Mortality and Readmission in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke. JAMA 2020; 323 (21) 2170-2184
- 18 Huang Q, Zhang J-Z, Xu W-D, Wu J. Generalization of the right acute stroke promotive strategies in reducing delays of intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97 (25) e11205
- 19 McDermott M, Skolarus LE, Burke JF. A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions to increase stroke thrombolysis. BMC Neurol 2019; 19 (01) 86
- 20 Rostanski SK, Shahn Z, Elkind MSV. et al. Door-to-Needle Delays in Minor Stroke: A Causal Inference Approach. Stroke 2017; 48 (07) 1980-1982
- 21 Tanne D, Kasner SE, Demchuk AM. et al. Markers of increased risk of intracerebral hemorrhage after intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator therapy for acute ischemic stroke in clinical practice: the Multicenter rt-PA Stroke Survey. Circulation 2002; 105 (14) 1679-1685
- 22 Skolarus LE, Scott PA, Burke JF. et al. Antihypertensive treatment prolongs tissue plasminogen activator door-to-treatment time: secondary analysis of the INSTINCT trial. Stroke 2012; 43 (12) 3392-3394
- 23 Gillum LA, Johnston SC. Characteristics of academic medical centers and ischemic stroke outcomes. Stroke 2001; 32 (09) 2137-2142