Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1768025
Accuracy and Utility of Internet Image Search as a Learning Tool for Retinal Pathology
Abstract
Purpose Ophthalmology residency training heavily relies on visual and pattern recognition-based learning. In parallel with traditional reference texts, online internet search via Google Image Search (GIS) is commonly used and offers an accessible fund of reference images for ophthalmology trainees seeking rapid exposure to images of retinal pathology. However, the accuracy and quality of this tool within this context is unknown. We aim to evaluate the accuracy and quality of GIS images of selected retinal pathologies.
Methods A cross-sectional study was performed of GIS of 15 common and 15 rare retinal diseases drawn from the American Academy of Ophthalmology residency textbook series. A total of 300 evaluable image results were assessed for accuracy of images and image source accountability in consultation with a vitreoretinal surgeon.
Results A total of 377 images were reviewed with 77 excluded prior to final analysis. A total of 288 (96%) search results accurately portrayed the retinal disease being searched, whereas 12 (4%) were of an erroneous diagnosis. More images of common retinal diseases were from patient education Web sites than were images of rare diseases (p < 0.01). Significantly more images of rare retinal diseases were found in peer-reviewed sources (p = 0.01).
Conclusions GIS search results yielded a modest level of accuracy for the purposes of ophthalmic education. Despite the ease and rapidity of accessing multimodal retinal imaging examples, this tool may best be suited as a supplementary resource for learning among residents due to limited accuracy, lack of sufficient supporting information, and the source Web site's focus on patient education.
Keywords
vitreoretinal education - online medical education tools - medical education technology - visual learningPublication History
Received: 14 August 2022
Accepted: 01 March 2023
Article published online:
12 April 2023
© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Statcounter Global Stats - Browser. . OS, search engine including mobile usage share. StatCounter Global Stats. Accessed January 29, 2022 at: https://gs.statcounter.com/
- 2 Gurwin J, Revere KE, Niepold S. et al. A randomized controlled study of art observation training to improve medical student ophthalmology skills. Ophthalmology 2018; 125 (01) 8-14
- 3 Ekenze SO, Okafor CI, Ekenze OS, Nwosu JN, Ezepue UF. The value of internet tools in undergraduate surgical education: perspective of medical students in a developing country. World J Surg 2017; 41 (03) 672-680
- 4 Egle JP, Smeenge DM, Kassem KM, Mittal VK. The internet school of medicine: use of electronic resources by medical trainees and the reliability of those resources. J Surg Educ 2015; 72 (02) 316-320
- 5 Derakhshan A, Lee L, Bhama P, Barbarite E, Shaye D. Assessing the educational quality of ‘YouTube’ videos for facelifts. Am J Otolaryngol 2019; 40 (02) 156-159
- 6 Connelly TM, Khan MS, Alzamzami M, Cooke F. An evaluation of the quality and content of web-based stoma information. Colorectal Dis 2019; 21 (03) 349-356
- 7 Azer SA, AlSwaidan NM, Alshwairikh LA, AlShammari JM. Accuracy and readability of cardiovascular entries on Wikipedia: are they reliable learning resources for medical students?. BMJ Open 2015; 5 (10) e008187
- 8 Azer SA. Evaluation of gastroenterology and hepatology articles on Wikipedia: are they suitable as learning resources for medical students?. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 26 (02) 155-163
- 9 Yacob M, Lotfi S, Tang S, Jetty P. Wikipedia in vascular surgery medical education: comparative study. JMIR Med Educ 2020; 6 (01) e18076
- 10 Scaffidi MA, Khan R, Wang C. et al. Comparison of the impact of Wikipedia, UpToDate, and a digital textbook on short-term knowledge acquisition among medical students: randomized controlled trial of three web-based resources. JMIR Med Educ 2017; 3 (02) e20
- 11 Smith DA. Situating Wikipedia as a health information resource in various contexts: a scoping review. PLoS One 2020; 15 (02) e0228786
- 12 Aykut A, Kukner AS, Karasu B, Palancıglu Y, Atmaca F, Aydogan T. Everything is ok on YouTube! Quality assessment of YouTube videos on the topic of phacoemulsification in eyes with small pupil. Int Ophthalmol 2019; 39 (02) 385-391
- 13 McKee HD, Jhanji V. Learning DMEK from YouTube. Cornea 2017; 36 (12) 1477-1479
- 14 Freeman R, Ashouri F, Papanikitas J, Ricketts D. Accuracy of internet images of glenoid labral injuries. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2013; 95 (06) 418-420
- 15 Brin S, Page L. The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine. Comput Netw ISDN Syst 1998; 30 (01) 107-117
- 16 American Academy of Ophthalmology. McCannel CA, Berrocal AM. et al. 2019-2020 BCSC: Basic and Clinical Science Course. San Francisco, CA: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2019