CC BY 4.0 · Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2024; 28(01): e76-e82
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1767804
Original Research

Prospective Evaluation of the Efficacy of Isolated Balloon Eustachian Tuboplasty: Short- and Medium-term Follow-up Results Based on Tubomanometry, ETDQ-7, Tympanometry, and Valsalva Maneuver

1   Otorhinolaryngology Service, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal
,
1   Otorhinolaryngology Service, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal
,
1   Otorhinolaryngology Service, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal
,
1   Otorhinolaryngology Service, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal
,
1   Otorhinolaryngology Service, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal
,
1   Otorhinolaryngology Service, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal
› Author Affiliations

Funding None to declare.

Abstract

Introduction Balloon eustachian tuboplasty (BET) allows the treatment of the main etiology of eustachian tube disfunction (ETD).

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of isolated BET, through objective and subjective results, in the short and medium term, in patients with chronic obstructive ETD.

Methods Adult patients diagnosed with chronic obstructive ETD who underwent BET between January 2018 and December 2020 were enrolled in the study. We performed a prospective observational study of BET efficacy, by comparing subjective data, based on the Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire-7 (ETDQ-7), and objective data, obtained by tympanometry, objective Valsalva maneuver and tubomanometry, prior to BET with these outcome tools on postprocedure follow-up.

Results In total, 30 BETs were performed and analyzed. There were no complications with the procedure. Analysis of BET efficacy was performed in the short-term (average of 7.5 weeks) and in the medium-term (average of 8 months). There was a significant reduction (p < 0.0001) in the total ETDQ-7 score from baseline to both follow-up periods. A normalization of the ETDQ-7 score was observed in 60 and 83.3% of the performed procedures, in the short- and medium-term, respectively. In tubomanometry, we verified a significant improvement (p < 0.0001) at all pressures, with a normalization of tubomanometry values in 53.3% and 43.3% of cases in the short- and medium-term, respectively. Tympanogram normalization occurred in 71.4% of patients with abnormal preoperative assessments.

Conclusion As an isolated procedure, BET results in significant improvements in symptomatology and objective metric results. This, associated with its safety profile, currently makes BET the most indicated therapeutic option in refractory obstructive ETD.



Publication History

Received: 27 June 2022

Accepted: 03 November 2022

Article published online:
19 September 2023

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

 
  • References

  • 1 Schilder AGM, Bhutta MF, Butler CC. et al. Eustachian tube dysfunction: consensus statement on definition, types, clinical presentation and diagnosis. Clin Otolaryngol 2015; 40 (05) 407-411
  • 2 Tysome JR, Sudhoff H. The role of the eustachian tube in middle ear disease. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 2018; 81: 146-152
  • 3 Froehlich MH, Le PT, Nguyen SA, McRackan TR, Rizk HG, Meyer TA. Eustachian Tube Balloon Dilation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Treatment Outcomes. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020; 163 (05) 870-882
  • 4 Anand V, Poe D, Dean M. et al. Balloon Dilation of the Eustachian Tube: 12-Month Follow-up of the Randomized Controlled Trial Treatment Group. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019; 160 (04) 687-694
  • 5 Kivekäs I, Chao WC, Faquin W. et al. Histopathology of balloon-dilation Eustachian tuboplasty. Laryngoscope 2015; 125 (02) 436-441
  • 6 Plaza G, Navarro JJ, Alfaro J, Sandoval M, Marco J. Consenso sobre el tratamiento de la disfunción tubárica obstructiva mediante dilatación con balón. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 2019; 71 (03) 181-189
  • 7 Schröder S, Lehmann M, Sauzet O, Ebmeyer J, Sudhoff H. A novel diagnostic tool for chronic obstructive eustachian tube dysfunction—the eustachian tube score. Laryngoscope 2015; 125 (03) 703-708
  • 8 Sousa Menezes A, Ribeiro D, Miranda DA, Martins Pereira S. Perilymphatic fistula and pneumolabyrinth without temporal bone fracture: a rare entity. BMJ Case Rep 2019; 12 (03) e228457
  • 9 Schröder S, Lehmann M, Korbmacher D, Sauzet O, Sudhoff H, Ebmeyer J. Evaluation of tubomanometry as a routine diagnostic tool for chronic obstructive Eustachian tube dysfunction. Clin Otolaryngol 2015; 40 (06) 691-697
  • 10 Estève D, Dubreuil C, Vedova CD, Normand B, Martin C. Evaluation par tubomanométrie de la fonction d'ouverture tubaire et de la réponse tympanique chez le sujet normal et chez le sujet porteur d'une otite séro-muqueuse chronique : Comparaison des résultats. J Fr Otorhinolaryngol. 2001; 50: 223-232
  • 11 Poe D, Anand V, Dean M. et al. Balloon Dilation of the Eustachian Tube for Dilatory Dysfunction: A Randomized Controlled Trial. 2017; 1-7
  • 12 Lafferty DJ, McKinnon BJ. To Balloon or Not to Balloon, The Current State of Management of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction. Ear Nose Throat J 2021; 100 (10) 696-697
  • 13 Ockermann T, Reineke U, Upile T, Ebmeyer J, Sudhoff HH. Balloon dilatation eustachian tuboplasty: a clinical study. Laryngoscope 2010; 120 (07) 1411-1416
  • 14 Schröder S, Lehmann M, Ebmeyer J, Upile T, Sudhoff H. Balloon Eustachian tuboplasty: a retrospective cohort study. Clin Otolaryngol 2015; 40 (06) 629-638
  • 15 Hwang SY, Kok S, Walton J. Balloon dilation for eustachian tube dysfunction: systematic review. J Laryngol Otol 2016; 130 (Suppl 4): S2-S6
  • 16 Huisman JML, Verdam FJ, Stegeman I, de Ru JA. Treatment of Eustachian tube dysfunction with balloon dilation: A systematic review. Laryngoscope 2018; 128 (01) 237-247
  • 17 Ramakrishnan N, D'Souza R, Kadambi P. A Systematic Literature Review of the Safety and Efficacy of Eustachian Balloon Tuboplasty in Patients with Chronic Eustachian Tube Dysfunction. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019; 71 (03) 406-412
  • 18 Luukkainen V, Kivekäs I, Silvola J, Jero J, Sinkkonen ST. Balloon eustachian tuboplasty: Systematic review of long-term outcomes and proposed indications. J Int Adv Otol 2018; 14 (01) 112-126
  • 19 Wang TC, Lin CD, Shih TC. et al. Comparison of Balloon Dilation and Laser Eustachian Tuboplasty in Patients with Eustachian Tube Dysfunction: A Meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2018; 158 (04) 617-626
  • 20 Fontes Lima A, Carvalho Moreira F, Sousa Menezes A, Azevedo C, Costa I, Milhazes Mar F. et al. Eustachian Tube function tests: Prospective analysis of diagnosis accuracy. Rev Port Otorrinolaringol E Cir Cabeça E Pescoço 2020; 58 (01) 31-66
  • 21 Tucci DL, McCoul ED, Rosenfeld RM. et al. Clinical Consensus Statement: Balloon Dilation of the Eustachian Tube. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019; 161 (01) 6-17
  • 22 Cutler JL, Meyer TA, Nguyen SA, O'Malley EM, Thackeray L, Slater PW. Long-term Outcomes of Balloon Dilation for Persistent Eustachian Tube Dysfunction. Otol Neurotol 2019; 40 (10) 1322-1325
  • 23 Micucci S, Keschner DB, Liang J. Eustachian Tube Balloon Dilation: Emerging Practice Patterns for a Novel Procedure. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2018; 127 (11) 848-855
  • 24 Schmitt D, Akkari M, Mura T, Mondain M, Uziel A, Venail F. Medium-term assessment of Eustachian tube function after balloon dilation. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2018; 135 (02) 105-110 [Internet]
  • 25 Xiong H, Liang M, Zhang Z. et al. Efficacy of balloon dilation in the treatment of symptomatic Eustachian tube dysfunction: One year follow-up study. Am J Otolaryngol 2016; 37 (02) 99-102