CC BY 4.0 · Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2024; 28(01): e157-e164
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1767797
Original Research

Effect of Speaking Valves on Tracheostomy Decannulation

Bradley W. Eichar
1   Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
,
Thomas M. Kaffenberger
1   Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
,
2   Office of Research and Development, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
,
Reema K. Padia
1   Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
2   Office of Research and Development, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
,
Hiren Muzumdar
3   Division of Pulmonary Medicine, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
,
Allison B. J. Tobey
1   Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
2   Office of Research and Development, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
› Author Affiliations
Funding The author(s) received no financial support for the research.

Abstract

Introduction Despite several pediatric tracheostomy decannulation protocols there remains tremendous variability in practice. The effect of tracheostomy capping on decannulation has been studied but the role of speaking valves (SVs) is unknown.

Objective Given the positive benefits SVs have on rehabilitation, we hypothesized that SVs would decrease time to tracheostomy decannulation. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate this in a subset of patients with chronic lung disease of prematurity (CLD).

Methods A retrospective chart review was performed at a tertiary care children's hospital. A total of 105 patients with tracheostomies and CLD were identified. Data collected included demographics, gestational age, congenital cardiac disease, airway surgeries, granulation tissue excisions, SV and capping trials, tracheitis episodes, and clinic visits. Statistics were performed with logistic and linear regression.

Results A total of 75 patients were included. The mean gestational age was 27 weeks (standard deviation [SD] = 3.6) and the average birthweight was 1.1 kg (SD = 0.6). The average age at tracheostomy was 122 days (SD = 63). A total of 70.7% of the patients underwent decannulation and the mean time to decannulation (TTD) was 37 months (SD = 19). A total of 77.3% of the patients had SVs. Those with an SV had a longer TTD compared to those without (52 versus 35 months; p = 0.008). Decannulation was increased by 2 months for every increase in the number of hospital presentations for tracheitis (p = 0.011).

Conclusion The present study is the first, to our knowledge, to assess the effect of SVs on tracheostomy decannulation in patients with CLD showing a longer TTD when SVs are used.

The present work was presented virtually as a podium presentation at the American Academy of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery Conference from September 13- October 25, 2020.




Publication History

Received: 12 April 2022

Accepted: 05 December 2022

Article published online:
06 October 2023

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

 
  • References

  • 1 Baker CD. Long-term ventilation for children with chronic lung disease of infancy. Curr Opin Pediatr 2019; 31 (03) 357-366 DOI: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000757.
  • 2 Berry JG, Graham DA, Graham RJ. et al. Predictors of clinical outcomes and hospital resource use of children after tracheotomy. Pediatrics 2009; 124 (02) 563-572 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2008-3491.
  • 3 Carr MM, Poje CP, Kingston L, Kielma D, Heard C. Complications in pediatric tracheostomies. Laryngoscope 2001; 111 (11 Pt 1): 1925-1928 DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200111000-00010.
  • 4 Jobe AH, Bancalari E. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001; 163 (07) 1723-1729 DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.163.7.2011060.
  • 5 Carter P, Benjamin B. Ten-year review of pediatric tracheotomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1983; 92 (4 Pt 1): 398-400 DOI: 10.1177/000348948309200422.
  • 6 Cristea AI, Ackerman VL, Davis SD. et al. Median household income: association with mortality in children on chronic ventilation at home secondary to bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Pediatr Allergy Immunol Pulmonol 2015; 28 (01) 41-46 DOI: 10.1089/ped.2014.0406.
  • 7 Cristea AI, Carroll AE, Davis SD, Swigonski NL, Ackerman VL. Outcomes of children with severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia who were ventilator dependent at home. Pediatrics 2013; 132 (03) e727-e734 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2012-2990.
  • 8 D'Souza JN, Levi JR, Park D, Shah UK. Complications following pediatric tracheotomy. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016; 142 (05) 484-488 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.0173.
  • 9 Funamura JL, Durbin-Johnson B, Tollefson TT, Harrison J, Senders CW. Pediatric tracheotomy: indications and decannulation outcomes. Laryngoscope 2014; 124 (08) 1952-1958 DOI: 10.1002/lary.24596.
  • 10 Gray RF, Todd NW, Jacobs IN. Tracheostomy decannulation in children: approaches and techniques. Laryngoscope 1998; 108 (1 Pt 1): 8-12 DOI: 10.1097/00005537-199801000-00002.
  • 11 Hopkins C, Whetstone S, Foster T, Blaney S, Morrison G. The impact of paediatric tracheostomy on both patient and parent. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2009; 73 (01) 15-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2008.09.010.
  • 12 Overman AE, Liu M, Kurachek SC. et al. Tracheostomy for infants requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation: 10 years' experience. Pediatrics 2013; 131 (05) e1491-e1496 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2012-1943.
  • 13 Quinlan C, Piccione J, Kim JY. et al. The role of polysomnography in tracheostomy decannulation of children with bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Pediatr Pulmonol 2019; 54 (11) 1676-1683 DOI: 10.1002/ppul.24474.
  • 14 Mandy G, Malkar M, Welty SE. et al. Tracheostomy placement in infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia: safety and outcomes. Pediatr Pulmonol 2013; 48 (03) 245-249 DOI: 10.1002/ppul.22572.
  • 15 Mitchell RB, Hussey HM, Setzen G. et al. Clinical consensus statement: tracheostomy care. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 148 (01) 6-20 DOI: 10.1177/0194599812460376.
  • 16 Bergbom-Engberg I, Haljamäe H. Assessment of patients' experience of discomforts during respirator therapy. Crit Care Med 1989; 17 (10) 1068-1072 DOI: 10.1097/00003246-198910000-00021.
  • 17 Elpern EH, Borkgren Okonek M, Bacon M, Gerstung C, Skrzynski M. Effect of the Passy-Muir tracheostomy speaking valve on pulmonary aspiration in adults. Heart Lung 2000; 29 (04) 287-293 DOI: 10.1067/mhl.2000.106941.
  • 18 Eibling DE, Gross RD. Subglottic air pressure: a key component of swallowing efficiency. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1996; 105 (04) 253-258 DOI: 10.1177/000348949610500401.
  • 19 Lichtman SW, Birnbaum IL, Sanfilippo MR, Pellicone JT, Damon WJ, King ML. Effect of a tracheostomy speaking valve on secretions, arterial oxygenation, and olfaction: a quantitative evaluation. J Speech Hear Res 1995; 38 (03) 549-555 DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3803.549.
  • 20 Prigent H, Lejaille M, Terzi N. et al. Effect of a tracheostomy speaking valve on breathing-swallowing interaction. Intensive Care Med 2012; 38 (01) 85-90 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-011-2417-8.
  • 21 Gross RD, Mahlmann J, Grayhack JP. Physiologic effects of open and closed tracheostomy tubes on the pharyngeal swallow. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2003; 112 (02) 143-152 DOI: 10.1177/000348940311200207.
  • 22 Stachler RJ, Hamlet SL, Choi J, Fleming S. Scintigraphic quantification of aspiration reduction with the Passy-Muir valve. Laryngoscope 1996; 106 (2 Pt 1): 231-234 DOI: 10.1097/00005537-199602000-00024.
  • 23 Falla PI, Westhoff JH, Bosch N, Federspil PA. Factors influencing time-dependent decannulation after pediatric tracheostomy according to the Kaplan-Meier method. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2020; 277 (04) 1139-1147 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-05827-w.
  • 24 Abode KA, Drake AF, Zdanski CJ, Retsch-Bogart GZ, Gee AB, Noah TL. A multidisciplinary children's airway center: impact on the care of patients with tracheostomy. Pediatrics 2016; 137 (02) e20150455 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2015-0455.
  • 25 Mahadevan M, Barber C, Salkeld L, Douglas G, Mills N. Pediatric tracheotomy: 17 year review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2007; 71 (12) 1829-1835 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2007.08.007.
  • 26 French LC, Wootten CT, Thomas RG, Neblett III WW, Werkhaven JA, Cofer SA. Tracheotomy in the preschool population: indications and outcomes. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007; 137 (02) 280-283 DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2007.02.021.
  • 27 Özmen S, Özmen ÖA, Ünal ÖF. Pediatric tracheotomies: a 37-year experience in 282 children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2009; 73 (07) 959-961 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.03.020.
  • 28 de Trey L, Niedermann E, Ghelfi D, Gerber A, Gysin C. Pediatric tracheotomy: a 30-year experience. J Pediatr Surg 2013; 48 (07) 1470-1475 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.09.066.
  • 29 Tantinikorn W, Alper CM, Bluestone CD, Casselbrant ML. Outcome in pediatric tracheotomy. Am J Otolaryngol 2003; 24 (03) 131-137 DOI: 10.1016/S0196-0709(03)00009-7.
  • 30 Zabih W, Holler T, Syed F, Russell L, Allegro J, Amin R. The use of speaking valves in children with tracheostomy tubes. Respir Care 2017; 62 (12) 1594-1601 DOI: 10.4187/respcare.0559931.
  • 31 Brigger MT, Hartnick CJ. Drilling speaking valves: a modification to improve vocalization in tracheostomy dependent children. Laryngoscope 2009; 119 (01) 176-179 DOI: 10.1002/lary.20077.
  • 32 Buckland A, Jackson L, Ilich T, Lipscombe J, Jones G, Vijayasekaran S. Drilling speaking valves to promote phonation in tracheostomy-dependent children. Laryngoscope 2012; 122 (10) 2316-2322 DOI: 10.1002/lary.23436.
  • 33 Cho Lieu JE, Muntz HR, Prater D, Blount Stahl M. Passy-Muir valve in children with tracheotomy. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1999; 50 (03) 197-203 DOI: 10.1016/s0165-5876(99)00245-1.
  • 34 Engleman SG, Turnage-Carrier C. Tolerance of the Passy-Muir Speaking Valve in infants and children less than 2 years of age. Pediatr Nurs 1997; 23 (06) 571-573
  • 35 Fraser J, Pengilly A, Mok Q. Long-term ventilator-dependent children: a vocal profile analysis. Pediatr Rehabil 1998; 2 (02) 71-75 DOI: 10.3109/17518429809068158.
  • 36 Gereau SA, Navarro GC, Cluterio B, Mullan E, Bassila M, Ruben RJ. Selection of pediatric patients for use of the Passy-Muir valve for speech production. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1996; 35 (01) 11-17 DOI: 10.1016/0165-5876(95)01258-3.
  • 37 Hull EM, Dumas HM, Crowley RA, Kharasch VS. Tracheostomy speaking valves for children: tolerance and clinical benefits. Pediatr Rehabil 2005; 8 (03) 214-219 DOI: 10.1080/13638490400021503.
  • 38 Torres LY, Sirbegovic DJ. Clinical benefits of the Passy-Muir tracheostomy and ventilator speaking valves in the NICU. Neonatal Intensive Care: The Journal of Perinatology-Neonatology 2004; 17 (04) 20-23
  • 39 Buswell C, Powell J, Powell S. Paediatric tracheostomy speaking valves: our experience of forty-two children with an adapted Passy-Muir® speaking valve. Clin Otolaryngol 2017; 42 (04) 941-944 DOI: 10.1111/coa.12776.
  • 40 Ongkasuwan J, Turk CL, Rappazzo CA, Lavergne KA, Smith EO, Friedman EM. The effect of a speaking valve on laryngeal aspiration and penetration in children with tracheotomies. Laryngoscope 2014; 124 (06) 1469-1474 DOI: 10.1002/lary.24457.
  • 41 Simons JP, Mehta D, Mandell DL. Assessment of constipation in children with tracheostomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010; 136 (01) 27-32 DOI: 10.1001/archoto.2009.207.