Does Chemical Shift Magnetic Resonance Imaging Improve Visualization of Pars Interarticularis Defect?

Abstract

Introduction A unilateral or bilateral pars interarticularis defect (spondylolysis) is a leading cause of axial back pain in adolescent athletes. Currently, a spectrum of imaging modalities is used for assessment of pars interarticularis defects.

Objectives The aim of this study is to compare the accuracy of chemical shift sequence (magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) technique to conventional MRI sequences in the detection of pars defects.

Patients and Methods Conventional T1, T2, and short tau inversion recovery sagittal and axial, as well as “in-” and “out-” phase chemical shift sagittal MRI sequences of 70 consecutive patients referred for low back pain were reviewed. Demographic details, clinical indication, and presence/diagnosis of pars defects using a 5-point Likert scale on both conventional and chemical shift MRI sequences. Spearman's correlation was used for statistical analysis. Intraclass correlation coefficient analysis was evaluated to assess the intraclass reliability between observers. Data were analyzed using DATAtab web-based statistics software (2022).

Results A total of 70 patients with an average age of 54.34 years with a female predominance were included. There were 11 pars defects in the cohort. Both in and out phases of chemical shift imaging were able to identify pars defect and intact pars. However, out phase was relatively better in delineating pars defects, while the in phase was superior in identifying an intact pars, though this was not statistically significant. There was good intra- and interobserver reliabilities.

Conclusion Chemical shift MRI sequence is a quicker, complementary technique to assess and analyze pars interarticularis confidently than conventionally utilized MRI sequences in patients being evaluated for axial back pain.

Keywords

spondylolysis - magnetic resonance imaging - chemical shift - back pain - athletes

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
20. März 2023

• References

• 1 Kim HJ, Green DW. Spondylolysis in the adolescent athlete. Curr Opin Pediatr 2011; 23 (01) 68-72
• 2 Purcell L, Micheli L. Low back pain in young athletes. Sports Health 2009; 1 (03) 212-222
• 3 McCleary MD, Congeni JA. Current concepts in the diagnosis and treatment of spondylolysis in young athletes. Curr Sports Med Rep 2007; 6 (01) 62-66
• 4 Ang EC, Robertson AF, Malara FA. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 3-T magnetic resonance imaging with 3D T1 VIBE versus computer tomography in pars stress fracture of the lumbar spine. Skeletal Radiol 2016; 45 (11) 1533-1540
• 5 Bley TA, Wieben O, François CJ, Brittain JH, Reeder SB. Fat and water magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010; 31 (01) 4-18
• 6 Patel A, James SL, Davies AM, Botchu R. Spinal imaging update: an introduction to techniques for advanced MRI. Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B (12) 1683-1692
• 7 Earls JP, Krinsky GA. Abdominal and pelvic applications of opposed-phase MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169 (04) 1071-1077
• 8 Pezeshk P, Alian A, Chhabra A. Role of chemical shift and Dixon based techniques in musculoskeletal MR imaging. Eur J Radiol 2017; 94: 93-100
• 9 You JH, Kim IH, Hwang J, Lee HS, Park EH. Fracture of ankle: MRI using opposed-phase imaging obtained from turbo spin echo modified Dixon image shows improved sensitivity. Br J Radiol 2018; 91 (1088): 20170779
• 10 Pokharel SS, Macura KJ, Kamel IR, Zaheer A. Current MR imaging lipid detection techniques for diagnosis of lesions in the abdomen and pelvis. Radiographics 2013; 33 (03) 681-702