Open Access
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian Journal of Neurosurgery 2023; 12(03): 240-248
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1764455
Original Article

Efficacy of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring during the Treatment of Cervical Myelopathy

Austin S. Gamblin*
1   School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
,
Al-Wala Awad*
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
,
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
,
Jian Guan
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
4   Pacific Neurosciences Institute, Torrance, California, United States
,
Marcus D. Mazur
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
,
Erica F. Bisson
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
,
Orhan Bican
3   Department of Neurology, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
,
Andrew T. Dailey
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
› Institutsangaben
Preview

Abstract

Objective The accuracy of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) during surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) to detect iatrogenic nervous system injuries while they are reversible remains unknown. We evaluated a cohort of patients who had IONM during surgery to assess accuracy.

Methods Patients who underwent surgical treatment of CSM that included IONM from January 2018 through August 2018 were retrospectively identified. A standardized protocol was used for operative management. Clinical changes and postoperative neurological deficits were evaluated.

Results Among 131 patients in whom IONM was used during their procedure, 42 patients (age 58.2 ± 16.3 years, 54.8% males) showed IONM changes and 89 patients had no change. The reasons for IONM changes varied, and some patients had changes detected via multiple modalities: electromyography (n = 25, 59.5%), somatosensory-evoked potentials (n = 14, 33.3%), motor evoked potentials (n = 13, 31.0%). Three patients, all having baseline deficits before surgery, had postoperative deficits. Among the 89 patients without an IONM change, 4 showed worsened postoperative deficits, which were also seen at last follow-up. The sensitivity of IONM for predicting postoperative neurological change was 42.86% and the specificity was 68.55%. However, most patients (124, 94.7%) in whom IONM was used showed no worsened neurological deficit.

Conclusion IONM shows potential in ensuring stable postoperative neurological outcomes in most patients; however, its clinical use and supportive guidelines remain controversial. In our series, prediction of neurological deficits was poor in contrast to some previous studies. Further refinement of clinical and electrophysiological variables is needed to uniformly predict postoperative neurological outcomes.

* Contributed equally.




Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
27. März 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India