J Wrist Surg 2023; 12(06): 522-527
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1764301
Scientific Article

Clinical Outcomes of Trapeziometacarpal Arthrodesis with a Mean 3-Year Follow-up

1   Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology Surgery, Hand Surgery and Microsurgery Unit, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
,
1   Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology Surgery, Hand Surgery and Microsurgery Unit, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
,
1   Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology Surgery, Hand Surgery and Microsurgery Unit, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
,
Rubén Maestro-Carvajal
1   Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology Surgery, Hand Surgery and Microsurgery Unit, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
,
Javier Cervera-Irimia
1   Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology Surgery, Hand Surgery and Microsurgery Unit, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
› Institutsangaben

Funding None declared.
Preview

Abstract

Background This paper's purpose was to analyze clinical results obtained with trapeziometacarpal arthrodesis and complications comparing different osteosynthesis systems.

Methods Thirty-seven trapeziometacarpal arthrodesis were performed in our center in a 7-year period, with a mean age of 52 years and 34 months of follow-up. The implants were distributed homogenously into three groups, using bone grafts in 12.5% of them.

Results A 75% achieved complete consolidation with a mean postsurgical Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of 2.4, Kapandji Opposition Score (KOS) of 8.1, lateral pinch strength of 12.1 kg, tripod pinch strength of 3.6 kg, and tip-to-tip strength of 1.5 kg. Consolidation was not achieved in nine patients, of which five were asymptomatic, three reoperated on trapeziectomy and tenosuspension, and one rearthrodesis. No statistical association was found between the implant used and pseudoarthrosis (p = 0.17), VAS (p = 0.06), or KOS (p = 0.45).

Conclusions Trapeziometacarpal arthrodesis reduces pain for well-chosen patients. Nonunion has low clinical significance in most cases and does not seem to depend on the use of allograft or the type of implant but on an appropriate surgical technique.

Informed Consent

Verbal informed consent was obtained from all subjects for the study and further publication. Written informed consent was not obtained because the clinical evaluation of the absent variables in the clinical record was made nonpresential by telephone call. In case the patient requested written informed consent, we sent the attachment individually.


Trial Registration

Not applicable because no invasive procedure was performed.


Consent for Publication

The author grants the publisher the sole and exclusive license of the full copyright in the contribution, which license the publisher hereby accepts.


Authors' Contributions

All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.


Ethics Approval

Institutional review board approval under act 17/05/2021 was obtained prior to the commencement of the study by “Comité de Ética de la Investigación de la Fundación Jiménez Díaz.”




Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 19. Oktober 2022

Angenommen: 30. Januar 2023

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
05. April 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA