CC BY 4.0 · The Arab Journal of Interventional Radiology 2023; 07(S 01): S1-S41
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1763392
Category: Vascular Interventions

Endograft Apposition and Infrarenal Neck Enlargement after Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Claire Van Der Riet
1   Department of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
,
Philippe M. de Rooy
1   Department of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
,
Ignace F. J. Tielliu
1   Department of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
,
Rogier H. J. Kropman
2   Department of Vascular Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
,
Jan Wille
2   Department of Vascular Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
,
Ranjeet Narlawar
3   Department of Radiology, Northern Care Alliance NHS Group, The Royal Oldham Hospital, Oldham, United Kingdom
,
Nada Elzefzaf
4   Department of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Surgery, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
,
George A. Antoniou
5   School of Medical Sciences, Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
,
Jean-Paul P. M. de Vries
1   Department of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
,
Richte C. L. Schuurmann
6   Multimodality Medical Imaging Group, Technical Medical Center, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
› Author Affiliations
 

Introduction: Sufficient apposition and oversizing of the endograft are not regularly stated on post-EVAR (CTA) scan reports. In this study endograft apposition and neck enlargement (NE) after EVAR with an Endurant II(s) were analyzed and associated with supra- and infrarenal aortic neck morphology.

Method(s): NE, defined as the aortic diameter change between pre- and post-EVAR CTA scan, was determined at eight levels: +40, +30, +20, +15, +10, 0, −5, and −10 mm relative to the lowest renal artery baseline. The aortic neck diameter and preoperative oversizing were correlated to NE with the Pearson correlation coefficient. The effective post-EVAR endograft oversizing is calculated from the nominal endograft diameter and the post-EVAR neck diameter where the endograft is circumferentially apposed.

Result(s): Significant (p < 0.001) neck enlargement of 1.7 (0.9, 2.5) mm was observed 5 mm below the renal artery baseline, which resulted in an effective post-EVAR endograft oversizing <10% in 43% of the patients. No correlation was found between NE and aortic neck diameter or preoperative oversizing.

Conclusion(s): Patients with SAL <10 mm or effective oversizing <10% due to NE may benefit from intensified follow-up, but clinical consequences of SAL and NE should be evaluated in future longitudinal studies.



Publication History

Article published online:
09 February 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India