Subscribe to RSS
Download PDF
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1762894
Use of Propeller Flaps for the Reconstruction of Defects around the Ankle
Authors
Abstract
Background This article describes the clinical results of the use of propeller flaps during reconstruction of coverage defects around the ankle.
Methods A retrospective study of all patients with bone and soft tissue defects around the ankle reconstruction using propeller flap between January 2021 and December 2022 was conducted. Flap survival rate and complications were the outcomes variables.
Results A total of 14 reconstructions in 13 patients (mean age: 45.8 ± 16.7 years) using propeller flaps were performed in the study period. The medial malleolus was the most affected area (n = 5) and the defect size ranged from 12 to 33.7 cm2. The posterior tibial artery was used as a perforator in 11 flaps. Complications were identified in five flaps, four developed venous congestion and one case, reactivation of infection. Only one propeller flap presented complete failure associated with necrosis. Good soft tissue coverage was achieved in 13 of 14 flaps.
Conclusion Propeller flaps proved to be a valid management option during reconstruction of bone and soft tissue defects around the ankle, offering adequate coverage in most cases. Adequate patient selection is important to decrease the risk of complications.
Publication History
Received: 22 June 2022
Accepted: 31 October 2022
Article published online:
16 March 2023
© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Bhullar DS, Karuppiah SV, Aljawadi A. et al. Local flaps vs. free flaps for complex lower limb fractures: Effect of flap choice on patient-reported outcomes. J Orthop 2019; 17: 91-96
- 2 Zeiderman MR, Pu LLQ. Contemporary approach to soft-tissue reconstruction of the lower extremity after trauma. Burns Trauma 2021; 9: tkab024
- 3 AlMugaren FM, Pak CJ, Suh HP, Hong JP. Best local flaps for lower extremity reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020; 8 (04) e2774
- 4 Tajsic N, Winkel R, Husum H. Distally based perforator flaps for reconstruction of post-traumatic defects of the lower leg and foot. A review of the anatomy and clinical outcomes. Injury 2014; 45 (03) 469-477
- 5 Shahabuddin SF, Khurram MF. A study of clinical applications of perforator-based propeller flaps in leg reconstructive surgery: a single-center experience of 40 cases. Int J Low Extrem Wounds 2020; 19 (01) 70-77
- 6 Yildirim T, Unsal SS, Armangil M. Propeller flap: orthoplastic approach for coverage of distal leg and ankle defects. Foot Ankle Surg 2021; 27 (08) 874-878
- 7 Karki D, Narayan RP. The versatility of perforator-based propeller flap for reconstruction of distal leg and ankle defects. Plast Surg Int 2012; 2012: 303247
- 8 Teo TC. Propeller flaps for reconstruction around the foot and ankle. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37 (01) 22-31
- 9 Wang P, Lin F, Ma Y, Wang J, Zhou M, Rui Y. Predictors of the surgical outcome of propeller perforator flap reconstruction, focusing on the effective safe distance between the perforator and the wound edge. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2021; 22 (01) 643
- 10 Innocenti M, Dell'Acqua I, Famiglietti M, Vignini L, Menichini G, Ghezzi S. Free perforator flaps vs propeller flaps in lower limb reconstruction: a cost/effectiveness analysis on a series of 179 cases. Injury 2019; 50 (Suppl 5): S11-S16
- 11 Dhar LK, Talukder A, Kaiser A, Razia S, Jahan I, Islam MS. Posterior tibial artery perforator based propeller flap for lower leg and ankle defect coverage: a prospective observational study. Mymensingh Med J 2019; 28 (02) 311-316
- 12 Bekara F, Herlin C, Mojallal A. et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of perforator-pedicled propeller flaps in lower extremity defects: identification of risk factors for complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (01) 314-331
- 13 Song S, Jeong HH, Lee Y. et al. Direction of flap rotation in propeller flaps: does it really matter?. J Reconstr Microsurg 2019; 35 (08) 549-556
- 14 Ibrahim RM, Gunnarsson GL, Akram J, Sørensen JA, Thomsen JB. Color Doppler ultrasonography targeted reconstruction using pedicled perforator flaps-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Plast Surg 2018; 41 (05) 495-504
- 15 Hong JP, Hur J, Kim HB, Park CJ, Suh HP. The use of color duplex ultrasound for local perforator flaps in the extremity. J Reconstr Microsurg 2022; 38 (03) 233-237
- 16 D'Arpa S, Toia F, Pirrello R, Moschella F, Cordova A. Propeller flaps: a review of indications, technique, and results. BioMed Res Int 2014; 2014: 986829
- 17 Bekara F, Herlin C, Somda S, de Runz A, Grolleau JL, Chaput B. Free versus perforator-pedicled propeller flaps in lower extremity reconstruction: What is the safest coverage? A meta-analysis. Microsurgery 2018; 38 (01) 109-119
- 18 Shen L, Liu Y, Zhang C. et al. Peroneal perforator pedicle propeller flap for lower leg soft tissue defect reconstruction: clinical applications and treatment of venous congestion. J Int Med Res 2017; 45 (03) 1074-1089
- 19 Eldahshoury T, Cacciola R, El-Gazzar K. Safety and vascular impact of perforator propeller flaps during distal lower limb reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2021; 9 (12) e3993