CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2018; 06(03): E279-E280
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-124967
Owner and Copyright © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018

Colorectal polyp characterization: Is my computer better than me?

Roshan Patel
University of California, San Francisco, California, United States
Bill Scuba
University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Roy Soetikno
San Francisco Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, San Francisco, California, United States
Tonya Kaltenbach
University of California, San Francisco, California, United States
San Francisco Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, San Francisco, California, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
01 March 2018 (online)

Scientists and engineers have created computers that can play games with us [1] [2] [3]. In chess, these computers are as good, if not better, as the world class champions. Because they can be better, these computers allow us to learn from them. In turn, we become better. In medicine, similar systems allow the development of computer aided diagnosis (CAD), which provide suggested diagnosis to assist us [4] [5] [6] [7]. In gastroenterology, preliminary studies showed the feasibility of CAD for diagnosing colorectal lesions in computed tomography colonography [4] [5] [6].

CAD applied during colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening has great promise for detection and diagnosis of colorectal neoplasms. Nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasms and sessile serrated adenoma/polyps can be difficult to detect. Their appearance is subtly different than that of normal surrounding mucosa. They may be slightly red or they may have an overlying mucous cap. In addition, optical diagnosis of these nonpolyoid lesions can be less precise. Precision, on the other hand, is highly desirable as it has the potential to improve our management of polyps found at colonoscopy [8] [9] [10] because optical diagnosis can improve efficiency and reduce overall cost of screening colonoscopy. High precision can lead the practice of leaving in situ diminutive hyperplastic polyps of the rectosigmoid colon, resecting diminutive adenomas without histologic evaluation and referring polyps with submucosal invasion or advanced cancer to surgery. CAD can use Narrow-Band Imaging International Colorectal Endoscopic (NICE) classification using narrow-band imaging (NBI) with or without magnification [11].

A CAD system is essentially a math equation with many variable parameters. Through a process of cleverly directed trial and error, the parameters are adjusted based on training images, where a group of correctly identified images are presented. The changes that improve the equation’s ability to correctly categorize an image are kept and those that reduce its ability are discarded until no more improvements can be made.

In a recent pilot study, Tamai and coauthors assessed the feasibility of CAD for optical diagnosis of colorectal lesions [12]. The team developed a CAD system using magnifying narrow-band images to classify identified polyps as hyperplastic, adenoma, superficial submucosal, and deep submucosal lesions. The software incorporated modified NBI still polyp images to provide qualitative and quantitative characteristics. For the modified images, an experienced endoscopist determined the region of interest from the original still image, converted the NBI image into grayscale, maintained only the vessel color, and removed isolated points and holes. The software then employed Sano’s colorectal magnification NBI classification. The group studied the optical diagnosis performance of CAD in 121 NBI still polyp images (21 hyperplastic, 80 adenoma/superficial submucosal invasion and 20 deep submucosal invasion). The concordance rate of optical diagnosis of the images was 90.9 % between CAD and experienced endoscopists. The methods are limited, such as sample size, training and test set, and the application is for still images. Nevertheless, the results of the study showed the potential of CAD in management of colorectal neoplasms.

While Dr. Tamai and colleagues showed the potential application of CAD for polyp characterization, one could foresee CAD’s potential in detection of colorectal lesions as well. Prototypes have been developed to aid detection of colorectal lesions in which the systems would alert an endoscopist about subtle change that needs further investigation [13].

Endoscopists will not be replaced by CAD. Instead, we are a key component in the performance of the CAD system. Without an endoscopist to correctly identify appropriate training images, the machine learning system cannot learn and cannot perform – it has no context, no way to fix improperly identified images, and no ability to do anything on its own. To perform a colonoscopy, our very extensive knowledge base will still be needed. There are many steps before a lesion needs interpretation. We decide if the patients are suitable for the procedure. We prescribe the appropriate medications based on various considerations. We insert the colonoscope. We have to inspect the surface area of the colon and navigate barriers, such as folds, turns, and stool. We may wash or suction fluids. A significant amount of cognitive and technical work to reach the point to detect and then interpret a polyp is undertaken before CAD can be used. Suggestions by CAD will need to be interpreted in the appropriate clinical settings.

CAD has the potential to significantly change the way we perform endoscopy in the future. Coupling the power of machines with human knowledge and technique will be complementary to our mission to detect, diagnose and remove colorectal lesions, particularly flat lesions [14]. Ultimately, computers may facilitate improvement in colonoscopy performance and help us in our mission to prevent colorectal cancer incidence and mortality.