Outcomes of anterior myotomy versus posterior myotomy during POEM: a randomized pilot study

Abstract

Background and study aims Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) can be performed via an anterior or posterior approach, depending on the operator’s preference. Data are lacking on comparative outcomes of both approaches.

Patients and methods This is a pilot randomized study comparing endoscopic anterior and posterior myotomy during POEM in patients with Achalasia cardia (AC). Patients were randomized into 2 groups (n = 30 in each group); anterior myotomy group (AG) and posterior myotomy group (PG) and were followed at 1, 3 and 6 months after POEM.

Results Technical success was achieved in 100 % of cases in both groups and total operative time was comparable (AG – 65 ± 17.65 minutes versus PG – 61.2 ± 16.67; P = 0.38); Mucosotomies were more frequent in AG (20 % vs 3.3 %; P = 0.02). Difference in other perioperative adverse events (AE) including insufflation-related AE and bleeding in both groups were statistically insignificant. At 1-month follow-up Eckardt score AG 0.57 ± 0.56 vs PG 0.53 ± 0.71; (P = 0.81), mean LES pressure AG 11.93 ± 6.36 vs PG 11.77 ± 6.61; (P = 0.59) and esophageal emptying on timed barium swallow at 5 minutes AG 1.32 ± 1.08 cm vs PG 1.29 ± 0.79 cm; (P = 0.09) were comparable in both groups. At 3 months, Eckardt score (0.52 ± 0.59 vs 0.63 ± 0.62; P = 0.51) was similar in both groups. Incidence of esophagitis on EGD was comparable in both groups (24 % vs 33.3 %; P = 0.45), however, pH metry at 3 months showed significantly more esophageal acid exposure in posterior group (2.98 % ± 4.24 vs 13.99 % ± 14.48; P < 0.01). At 6 months clinical efficacy and LES pressures were comparable in both groups.

Conclusion Anterior and posterior approaches to POEM seem to have equal efficacy. However, the occurrence of mucosotomies was higher in the anterior myotomy group and acid exposure was higher with the posterior myotomy approach during POEM.

• References

• 1 Rohof WO, Salvador R, Annese V. et al. Outcomes of treatment for achalasia depend on manometric subtype. Gastroenterology 2013; 144: 718-725 ; quiz e13-4
• 2 Hungness ES, Teitelbaum EN, Santos BF. et al. Comparison of perioperative outcomes between peroral esophageal myotomy (POEM) and laparoscopic Heller myotomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2013; 17: 228-235
• 3 Inoue H, Sato H, Ikeda H. et al. Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy: A Series of 500 Patients. J Am Coll Surg 2015; 221: 256-264
• 4 Stavropoulos SN, Modayil RJ, Friedel D. et al. The International Per Oral Endoscopic Myotomy Survey (IPOEMS): a snapshot of the global POEM experience. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 3322-3338
• 5 Ramchandani M, Nageshwar ReddyD. Peroral endoscopic myotomy: technique of mucosal incision. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 12: 900-901
• 6 Ramchandani M, Nageshwar ReddyD, Darisetty S. et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia cardia: Treatment analysis and follow up of over 200 consecutive patients at a single center. Dig Endosc 2016; 28: 19-26
• 7 Neyaz Z, Gupta M, Ghoshal UC. How to perform and interpret timed barium esophagogram. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2013; 19: 251-256
• 8 Kahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M. et al. The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3. 0. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2015; 27: 160-174
• 9 Kusano M, Shimoyama Y, Sugimoto S. et al. Development and evaluation of FSSG: frequency scale for the symptoms of GERD. J Gastroenterol 2004; 39: 888-891
• 10 Kim GH. How to Interpret Ambulatory 24 hr Esophageal pH Monitoring. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2010; 16: 207-210
• 11 Moonen A, Annese V, Belmans A. et al. Long-term results of the European achalasia trial: a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing pneumatic dilation versus laparoscopic Heller myotomy. Gut 2016; 65: 732-739
• 12 Yaghoobi M, Mayrand S, Martel M. et al. Laparoscopic Heller's myotomy versus pneumatic dilation in the treatment of idiopathic achalasia: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 78: 468-475
• 13 Ujiki MB, Yetasook AK, Zapf M. et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy: A short-term comparison with the standard laparoscopic approach. Surgery 2013; 154: 893-897 ; discussion 897 – 900
• 14 Bhayani NH, Kurian AA, Dunst CM. et al. A comparative study on comprehensive, objective outcomes of laparoscopic Heller myotomy with per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia. Ann Surg 2014; 259: 1098-1103
• 15 Inoue H, Minami H, Kobayashi Y. et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 265-271
• 16 Philips GM, Dacha S, Keilin SA. et al. Concurrent myotomy and tunneling after establishment of a half tunnel instead of myotomy after establishment of a full tunnel: a more efficient method of peroral endoscopic myotomy. Endosc Int Open 2016; 4: E403-408
• 17 Teitelbaum EN, Sternbach JM, El KhouryR. et al. The effect of incremental distal gastric myotomy lengths on EGJ distensibility during POEM for achalasia. Surg Endosc 2016; 30: 745-750
• 18 Bechara R, Onimaru M, Ikeda H. et al. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy, 1000 cases later: pearls, pitfalls, and practical considerations. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 84: 330-338
• 19 Kurian AA, Dunst CM, Sharata A. et al. Peroral endoscopic esophageal myotomy: defining the learning curve. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 719-725
• 20 Stavropoulos SN MR, Brathwaite C, Halwan B. et al. Anterior vs Posterior PerOral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM): Is There a Difference in Outcomes?. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83: AB145
• 21 Zhang XC, Li QL, Xu MD. et al. Major perioperative adverse events of peroral endoscopic myotomy: a systematic 5-year analysis. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 967-978
• 22 Werner YB, von Renteln D, Noder T. et al. Early adverse events of per-oral endoscopic myotomy. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 85: 708-718.e2
• 23 Khashab MA, El ZeinM, Kumbhari V. et al. Comprehensive analysis of efficacy and safety of peroral endoscopic myotomy performed by a gastroenterologist in the endoscopy unit: a single-center experience. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83: 117-125
• 24 Grimes KL, Inoue H. Per oral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia: A detailed description of the technique and review of the literature. Thorac Surg Clin 2016; 26: 147-162