A novel triple-anchoring technique for hybrid endoscopic mucosal resection

Endoscopy 2018; 50(02): E48-E49
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-121134

E-Videos

Authors

Jun Hamanaka

¹Digestive Endoscopy Unit, “A. Gemelli” University Hospital, Rome, Italy

²Department of Gastroenterology, Yokohama Minami Kyosai Hospital, Yokohama, Japan

³Department of Gastroenterology, Yokohama City University Graduate school of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
Cristiano Spada

¹Digestive Endoscopy Unit, “A. Gemelli” University Hospital, Rome, Italy
Maria Chiara Campanale

¹Digestive Endoscopy Unit, “A. Gemelli” University Hospital, Rome, Italy
Vincenzo Bove

¹Digestive Endoscopy Unit, “A. Gemelli” University Hospital, Rome, Italy
Shin Maeda

³Department of Gastroenterology, Yokohama City University Graduate school of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
Guido Costamagna

¹Digestive Endoscopy Unit, “A. Gemelli” University Hospital, Rome, Italy

References
1 Saito Y, Fukuzawa M, Matsuda T. et al. Clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal tumors as determined by curative resection. Surg Endosc 2010; 24: 343-352
2 Briedigkeit A, Sultanie O, Sido B. et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal adenomas > 20 mm: Risk factors for recurrence. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 8: 276-281
3 Yahagi N, Fujishiro M, Omata M. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal lesion. Dig Endosc 2004; 16: S178-S181
4 Saito Y, Uraoka T, Yamaguchi Y. et al. A prospective, multicenter study of 1111 colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 1217-1225
5 Toyonaga T, Man-I M, Morita Y. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) versus simplified/hybrid ESD. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2014; 24: 191-199