Download PDF
Psychiatr Prax 2017; 44(08): 431-433
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-120241
Editorial
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Partizipative und kollaborative Forschungsansätze in der Psychiatrie

Participatory and Collaborative Strategies in Psychiatric Research
Sebastian von Peter
Psychiatrische Universitätsklinik der Charité im St. Hedwig Krankenhaus, Berlin
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
06 November 2017 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Seit einigen Jahren fordern Psychiatrieerfahrene eine kritische Bewertung psychiatrischer Wissenschaften und Praxen. Das Machtgefälle zwischen Betroffenen und Profis wird problematisiert, das medizinische Modell von psychischer Erkrankung fundamental hinterfragt [1]. Betroffene sind bei der Herausbildung des psychiatrischen Diskurses seit Jahrzehnten nicht angehört worden. Nun fordern sie eine Beteiligung bei der Umgestaltung des Versorgungssystems.

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Russo J, Sweeney A. Searching for a Rose Garden: challenging psychiatry, fostering mad studies. Monmouth: PCCS Books; 2016
    Google Scholar
  • 2 International Collaboration for Participatory Health Research (ICPHR). Position Paper 1: What is Participatory Health Research?. (1.5.2013) Im Internet: http://www.icphr.org/uploads/2/0/3/9/20399575/ichpr_position_paper_1_defintion_-_version_may_2013.pdf (Stand: 1.9.2017)
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Rose D. The contemporary state of service-user-led research. Lancet 2015; 386: 959-960
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Cargo M, Mercer S. The Value and Challenges of Participatory Research: Strengthening Its Practice. Annu Rev Public Health 2008; 29: 325-350
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Wright MT, Nöcker G, Pawils S. et al. Partizipative Gesundheitsforschung. Ein neuer Ansatz für die Präventionsforschung. Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung 2013; 8: 119-121
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Park MM, Zafran H, Stewart J. et al. Transforming mental health services: a participatory mixed methods study to promote and evaluate the implementation of recovery-oriented services. Implement Sci 2014; 9: 119-123
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Russo J. Survivor-Controlled Research: A New Foundation for Thinking About Psychiatry and Mental Health. FQS 2012; 13
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Rose D, Evans J, Laker C. et al. Life in acute mental health settings: experiences and perceptions of service users and nurses. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 2015; 24: 90-96
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Gilburt H, Rose D, Slade M. The importance of relationships in mental health care: A qualitative study of service users’ experiences of psychiatric hospital admission in the UK. BMC Health Serv Res DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-92.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Rose D, Fleischmann P, Wykes T. et al. Patients’ perspectives on electroconvulsive therapy: systematic review. BMJ DOI: 10.1136/bmj.326.7403.1363.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Trivedi P, Wykes T. From passive subjects to equal partners: qualitative review of user involvement in research. BJP 2002; 181: 468-472
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Borg M, Karlsson B, McCormack B. Opening up for Many Voices in Knowledge Construction. FQS; 2012 13. Art. 1
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Sweeney A, Davis J, McLaren S. et al. Defining continuity of care from the perspectives of mental health service users and professionals: an exploratory, comparative study. Health Expectat 2016; 19: 973-987
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Evans J, Rose D, Craig T. et al. VOICE: developing a new measure of service users’ perceptions of inpatient care, using a participatory methodology. J Ment Health 2012; 21: 57-71
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Russo J, Fink T. Stellung nehmen. Obdachlosigkeit und Psychiatrie aus den Perspektiven der Betroffenen. Berlin: Der Paritaetische Berlin; 2003
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Lorenz A, Russo J, Scheibe F. Aus eigener Sicht. Erfahrungen von Nutzer/innen mit der Hilfe. Berlin: Paritätischer Wohlfahrtsverband Berlin; 2007
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Rifkin SB. Examining the links between community participation and health outcomes: a review of the literature. Health Policy Plan 2014; 29 (Suppl. 02) 98-106
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 O’Mara-Eves A, Brunton G, McDaid D. et al. Community engagement to reduce inequalities in health: a systematic review, meta-analysis and economic analysis. J Public Health Res; 2013 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0082550/
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Jagosh J, Macaulay AC, Pluye P. et al. Uncovering the benefits of participatory research: implications of a realist review for health research and practice. Milbank Q 2012; 90: 311-346
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Gillard S, Borschmann R, Turner K. et al. ‘What difference does it make?’ Finding evidence of the impact of mental health service user researchers on research into the experiences of detained psychiatric patients. Health Expectat 2010; 13: 185-194
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Partnet – Netzwerk für partizipative Gesundheitsforschung. 2017. Im Internet: http://www.partnet-gesundheit.de/ (Stand: 1.9.2017)
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Aktionsbündnis Teilhabeforschung. 2017. Im Internet: https://teilhabeforschung.bifos.org/ (Stand: 1.9.2017)