PDF herunterladen
ZWR - Das Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt 2017; 126(10): 480-484
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-119130
Wissenschaft | Implantologie
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Herausnehmbare Implantatkonzepte bei Zahnlosen – Literaturübersicht

Concepts for Implant-Retained Overdentures for Edentulous Patients – a Literature Review
Sebastian Brandstaeter
Klinik für Zahnärztliche Prothetik und Biomedizinische Werkstoffkunde, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover
,
Harald Tschernitschek
Klinik für Zahnärztliche Prothetik und Biomedizinische Werkstoffkunde, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover
,
Philipp-Cornelius Pott
Klinik für Zahnärztliche Prothetik und Biomedizinische Werkstoffkunde, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
24. Oktober 2017 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Konzepte zur herausnehmbaren, implantatgetragenen Versorgung des zahnlosen Kiefers sind stetiger Bestandteil wissenschaftlicher Diskussionen. Dabei beschäftigen sich Experten und Fachgesellschaften in ihren Publikationen, Stellungnahmen und Leitlinien insbesondere mit der notwendigen Anzahl der Implantate, deren Positionierung im Kiefer und der Verwendung unterschiedlicher Verankerungselemente. Ziel dieser Arbeit war es, den derzeitigen Stand der relevanten Fachliteratur zusammenzufassen und bezüglich der Evidenzen zu beurteilen.

Abstract

The different treatment options for edentulous jaws with implant-retained overdentures (IODs) are discussed in literature permanently. Dental experts and associations have published different studies, statements, and guidelines how to treat edentulous patients with IODs, especially concerning the number of implants, the implant position, and the use of different types of attachment systems. The aim of this study was to analyze and to summarize relevant literature and to rate the literature concerning their evidence.

Schlüsselwörter

implantatgetragener totaler Zahnersatz - Implantatzahl - zahnloser Kiefer - Evidenz

Key words

implant-retained-overdentures - number of implants - edentulous jaw - evidence based dentistry
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Schley JS, Terheyden H, Wolfart S. Implantatprothetische Versorgung des zahnlosen Oberkiefers: S3-Leitlinie. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 2013; 68: 494-507
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Kern JS, Terheyden H, Wolfart S. Implantatprothetische Versorgung des zahnlosen Oberkiefers: S3-Leitlinie. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 2017; 72: 257-267
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Schley JS, Terheyden H, Wolfart S. Leitlinienreport zur S3-Leitlinie: Implantatprothetische Versorgung des zahnlosen Oberkiefers. AWFM-Registriernummer 083-010, Stand November 2014. Im Internet: http://www.awmf.org Stand: 22.08.2017
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Konsensuskonferenz Implantologie. Indikationsbeschreibung für die Regelfallversorgung in der Implantologie. 2014 Im Internet: http://www.konsensuskonferenz-implantologie.eu/wp-content/uploads/141125_Indikationsklassen.pdf Stand: 12.01.2016
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Richter E. Implantologie in der Zahnheilkunde. Wissenschaftliche Stellungnahme der DGZMK. 2005 Im Internet: http://www.dgzmk.de/uploads/tx_szdgzmkdocuments/ALT_Implantologie_in_der_Zahnheilkunde_2005.pdf?PHPSESSID=f04391b1c3fd70dd2524fab21c3280b9 Stand: 29.11.2014
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA. et al. The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Gerodontology 2002; 19: 3-4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Thomason JM, Feine J, Exley C. et al. Mandibular two implant-supported overdentures as the first choice standard of care for edentulous patients–the York Consensus Statement. Br Dent J 2009; 207: 185-186
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Slot W, Raghoebar GM, Cune MS. et al. Maxillary overdentures supported by four or six implants in the anterior region: 5-year results from a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Periodontol 2016; 43: 1180-1187
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Kern JS, Kern T, Wolfart S. et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of removable and fixed implant-supported prostheses in edentulous jaws: post-loading implant loss. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016; 27: 174-195
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Karbach J, Hartmann S, Jahn-Eimermacher A. et al. Oral health-related quality of life in edentulous patients with two- vs. four-locator-retained mandibular overdentures: a prospective, randomized, crossover study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2015; 30: 1143-1148
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Dantas Ide S, Souza MB, Morais MH. et al. Success and survival rates of mandibular overdentures supported by two or four implants: a systematic review. Braz Oral Res 2014; 28: 74-80
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Raghoebar GM, Meijer HJ, Slot W. et al. A systematic review of implant-supported overdentures in the edentulous maxilla, compared to the mandible: how many implants?. Eur J Oral Implantol 2014; 7 (Suppl. 02) 191-201
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Dudley J. Maxillary implant overdentures: current controversies. Aust Dent J 2013; 58: 420-423
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Roccuzzo M, Bonino F, Gaudioso L. et al. What is the optimal number of implants for removable reconstructions? A systematic review on implant-supported overdentures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23 (Suppl. 06) 229-237
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Stoker G, van Waas R, Wismeijer D. Long-term outcomes of three types of implant-supported mandibular overdentures in smokers. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 925-929
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Lee JY, Kim HY, Shin SW. et al. Number of implants for mandibular implant overdentures: a systematic review. J Adv Prosthodont 2012; 4: 204-209
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Thomason JM, Kelly SA, Bendkowski A. et al. Two implant retained overdentures–a review of the literature supporting the McGill and York consensus statements. J Dent 2012; 40: 22-34
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Slot W, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A. et al. A systematic review of implant-supported maxillary overdentures after a mean observation period of at least 1 year. J Clin Periodontol 2010; 37: 98-110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Klemetti E. Is there a certain number of implants needed to retain an overdenture?. J Oral Rehabil 2008; 35 (Suppl. 01) 80-84
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Stoker GT, Wismeijer D, van Waas MA. An eight-year follow-up to a randomized clinical trial of aftercare and cost-analysis with three types of mandibular implant-retained overdentures. J Dent Res 2007; 86: 276-280
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Fitzpatrick B. Standard of care for the edentulous mandible: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 95: 71-78
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Balaguer J, Ata-Ali J, Penarrocha-Oltra D. et al. Long-term survival rates of implants supporting overdentures. J Oral Implantol 2015; 41: 173-177
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Heschl A, Payer M, Clar V. et al. Overdentures in the edentulous mandible supported by implants and retained by a Dolder bar: a 5-year prospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2013; 15: 589-599
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Krennmair G, Suto D, Seemann R. et al. Removable four implant-supported mandibular overdentures rigidly retained with telescopic crowns or milled bars: a 3-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 481-488
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Bressan E, Tomasi C, Stellini E. et al. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures: a cross-sectional study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 814-819
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Mumcu E, Bilhan H, Geckili O. The effect of attachment type and implant number on satisfaction and quality of life of mandibular implant-retained overdenture wearers. Gerodontology 2012; 29: 618-623
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Weinlander M, Piehslinger E, Krennmair G. Removable implant-prosthodontic rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible: five-year results of different prosthetic anchorage concepts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010; 25: 589-597
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 de Jong MH, Wright PS, Meijer HJ. et al. Posterior mandibular residual ridge resorption in patients with overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants in a 10-year prospective comparative study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010; 25: 1168-1174
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Vercruyssen M, Marcelis K, Coucke W. et al. Long-term, retrospective evaluation (implant and patient-centred outcome) of the two-implants-supported overdenture in the mandible. Part 1: survival rate. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21: 357-365
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Batenburg RH. et al. Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants: a 10-year clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 722-728
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Arat Bilhan S, Baykasoglu C, Bilhan H. et al. Effect of attachment types and number of implants supporting mandibular overdentures on stress distribution: a computed tomography-based 3D finite element analysis. J Biomech 2015; 48: 130-137
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Celik G, Uludag B. Effect of the number of supporting implants on mandibular photoelastic models with different implant-retained overdenture designs. J Prosthodont 2014; 23: 374-380
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Scherer MD, McGlumphy EA, Seghi RR. et al. Comparison of retention and stability of implant-retained overdentures based upon implant number and distribution. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013; 28: 1619-1628
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Arat Bilhan S, Bilhan H, Bozdag E. et al. The influence of the attachment type and implant number supporting mandibular overdentures on stress distribution: an in vitro study, part I. Implant Dent 2013; 22: 39-48
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Liu J, Pan S, Dong J. et al. Influence of implant number on the biomechanical behaviour of mandibular implant-retained/supported overdentures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Dent 2013; 41: 241-249
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Damghani S, Masri R, Driscoll CF. et al. The effect of number and distribution of unsplinted maxillary implants on the load transfer in implant-retained maxillary overdentures: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2012; 107: 358-365
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Kuoppala R, Napankangas R, Raustia A. Outcome of implant-supported overdenture treatment–a survey of 58 patients. Gerodontology 2012; 29: 577-584
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Sadig W. A comparative in vitro study on the retention and stability of implant-supported overdentures. Quintessence Int 2009; 40: 313-319
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Jivraj S, Chee W, Corrado P. Treatment planning of the edentulous maxilla. Br Dent J 2006; 201: 261-279
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Mericske-Stern RD, Taylor TD, Belser U. Management of the edentulous patient. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; 11 (Suppl. 01) 108-125
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Carlsson GE. Some issues related to evidence-based implantology. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2016; 16: 116-123
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Ascher A, Carlsson GE, Kronstrom M. Use of implant-supported prostheses in edentulous mandibles among prosthodontists in Sweden. Swed Dent J 2014; 38: 161-167
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Gutlapalli NJ, Reddy DM, Mikkilineni H. Implant-supported overdentures. J N J Dent Assoc 2013; 84: 24-27
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Melescanu Imre M, Marin M, Preoteasa E. et al. Two implant overdenture–the first alternative treatment for patients with complete edentulous mandible. J Med Life 2011; 4: 207-209
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Passia N, Kern M. The single midline implant in the edentulous mandible: a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig 2014; 18: 1719-1724
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar