Endoscopic full-thickness resection for T1 early rectal cancer: a case series and video report

Abstract

Background and study aims Endoscopic treatment of malignant colorectal polyps is often challenging, especially for early rectal cancer (ERC) localized close to the dentate line. Conversely, the surgical approach may result in temporary or definitive stoma and in frequent post-surgical complications. The Full-Thickness Resection Device (FTRD^®) System (Ovesco Endoscopy, Tübingen, Germany) is a novel system that, besides having other indications, appears to be promising for wall-thickness excision of intestinal T1 carcinoma following incomplete endoscopic resection. However, follow-up data on patients treated with this device are scarce, particularly for ERC.

Patients and methods Six consecutive patients with incomplete endoscopic resection of T1-ERC were treated with the FTRD and their long-term outcomes were evaluated based on a detailed clinical and instrumental assessment.

Results The endoscopic en bloc full-thickness resection was technically feasible in all patients. The histopathologic analysis showed a complete endoscopic resection in all cases, and a full-thickness excision in four. Neither complications, nor disease recurrence were observed during the 1-year follow-up period.

Conclusions The FTRD System is a promising tool for treating ERC featuring a residual risk of disease recurrence after incomplete endoscopic mucosal resection in patients unfit for surgery or refusing a surgical approach.

• References

• 1 Wasif N, Etzioni D, Maggard MA. et al. Trends, patterns, and outcomes in the management of malignant colonic polyps in the general population of the United States. Cancer 2011; 117: 931-937
• 2 Ueno H, Mochizuki H, Hashiguchi Y. et al. Risk factors for an adverse outcome in early invasive colorectal carcinoma. Gastroenterology 2004; 127: 385-394
• 3 Maeda K, Koide Y, Katsuno H. When is local excision appropriate for “early” rectal cancer?. Surg Today 2014; 44: 2000-2014
• 4 Wu SW, Ma CC, Yang Y. Role of protective stoma in low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20: 18031-18037
• 5 Glimelius B, Tiret E, Cervantes A. et al. Rectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. Ann Oncol 2013; 24: vi81-vi88
• 6 Schimdt A, Damm M, Caca K. et al. Endoscopic full-thickness resection using a novel over-the-scope device. Gastroenterology 2014; 147: 740-742
• 7 Richter-Schrag HJ, Walker C, Thimme R. et al. Full thickness resection device (FTRD): experience and outcome for benign neoplasms of the rectum and colon. Chirurg 2016; 87: 316-325
• 8 Schmidt A, Bauerfeind P, Gubler C. et al. Endoscopic full-thickness resection in the colorectum with a novel over-the-scope device: first experience. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 719-725
• 9 Sarker S, Gutierrez JP, Council L. et al. Over-the-scope clip-assisted method for resection of full-thickness submucosal lesions of the gastrointestinal tract. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 758-761
• 10 Fähndrich M, Sandmann M. Endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastrointestinal lesions using the over-the-scope clip system: a case series. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 76-79
• 11 Lagoussis P, Soriani P, Tontini GE. et al. Over-the-scope clip-assisted full thickness resection after incomplete resection of rectal adenocarcinoma. Endoscopy 2016; 48: E59-E60
• 12 Andrisani G, Pizzicannella M, Martino M. et al. Endoscopic full-thickness resection of superficial colorectal neoplasms using a new over-the-scope clip system: a single-centre study. Dig Liver Dis 2017; 49: 1009-1013
• 13 Williams JG, Pullan RD, Hill J. et al. Management of the malignant colorectal polyps: ACPGBI position statement. Colorectal Dis 2013; 15: 1-38
• 14 Hassan C, Zullo A, Risio M. et al. Histologic risk factors and clinical outcome in colorectal polyp: a pooled-data analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48: 1588-1596
• 15 Morson BC, Bussey HJR, Samoorian S. Policy of local excision for early cancer of the colon rectum. Gut 1977; 18: 1045-1050
• 16 Smith KJE, Jones PF, Burke DA. et al. Lymphatic vessels distribution in the mucosa and submucosa and potential implications for T1 colorectal tumors. Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54: 35-40
• 17 Gill MD, Rutter MD, Holtham SJ. et al. Management and short-term outcome of malignant colorectal polyps in the north of England. Colorectal Dis 2013; 15: 169-176
• 18 Sajid MS, Farag S, Leung P. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of published trials comparing the effectiveness of transanal endoscopic microsurgery and radical resection in the management of early rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2014; 16: 2-14
• 19 Kidane B, Chadi SA, Kanters S. et al. Local resection compared with radical resection in the treatment of T1N0M0 rectal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 2015; 58: 122-140
• 20 Bartel MJ, Brahmbhatt BS, Wallace MB. Management of colorectal T1 carcinoma treated by endoscopic resection from the Western perspective. Dig Endosc 2016; 28: 330-341
• 21 Guerrieri M, Baldarelli M, de Sanctis A. et al. Treatment of rectal adenomas by transanal endoscopic microsurgery: 15 years’ experience. Surg Endosc 2010; 24: 445-449
• 22 Palma P, Freudenberg S, Samel S. et al. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: indications and results after 100 cases. Colorectal Dis 2004; 6: 350-355
• 23 Lee L, Burke JP, deBeche-Adams T. et al. Transanal minimally invasive surgery for local excision of benign and malignant rectal neoplasia: outcomes from 200 consecutive cases with midterm follow up. Ann Surg 2017; DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002190. [Epub ahead of print]
• 24 Probst A, Ebigbo A, Märkl B. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early rectal neoplasia: experience from a European center. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 222-232
• 25 Kawaguti FS, Nahas CS, Marques CF. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus transanal endoscopic microsurgery for the treatment of early rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2014; 28: 1173-1179