A health economic evaluation of needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy for the diagnosis of pancreatic cysts
submitted 22 February 2017
accepted after revision 04 July 2017
09 October 2017 (online)
Background and study aims The low sensitivity of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA), especially for the diagnosis of serous cystadenomas (SCAs), can be associated with diagnostic uncertainty that can regularly lead to unnecessary surgical procedures. Needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (nCLE) used with EUS-FNA improves diagnostic accuracy, helping to reduce unnecessary surgery and patient follow-up. This study was conducted to evaluate the economic benefit of EUS-FNA + nCLE.
Patients and methods Probabilities used were derived from two studies representative of the two diagnostic strategies: a retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed by EUS-FNA alone and a prospective study of patients diagnosed by EUS-FNA + nCLE. Costs were based on French healthcare system rates; both private and public sector rates were included. A decision tree structure model used these probabilities and costs for two hypothetical cohorts of 1000 patients.
Results EUS-FNA + nCLE resulted in a reduction of 23 % in the total rate of surgical intervention, which translated to a reduction in clinical costs of 13 % (public sector) and 14 % (private sector). Additionally, the reduced rate of surgery would save the lives of 4 in 1000 patients. A stochastic sensitivity analysis using 100 simulations showed that in all cases the number of interventions was less for EUS-FNA + nCLE than for EUS-FNA. There was also a reduction in the incidence of false negatives using EUS-FNA + nCLE.
Conclusions EUS-FNA + nCLE results in significant economic benefits by reducing the incidence of misdiagnosis through improved diagnostic accuracy.
- 1 de Jong K, Bruno MJ, Fockens P. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of cystic lesions of the pancreas. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2012; 2012: 147465
- 2 de Jong K, Nio CY, Hermans JJ. et al. High prevalence of pancreatic cysts detected by screening magnetic resonance imaging examinations. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 8: 806-811
- 3 de Jong K, Nio CY, Mearadji B. et al. Disappointing interobserver agreement among radiologists for a classifying diagnosis of pancreatic cysts using magnetic resonance imaging. Pancreas 2012; 41: 278-282
- 4 Park WG, Mascarenhas R, Palaez-Luna M. et al. Diagnostic performance of cyst fluid carcinoembryonic antigen and amylase in histologically confirmed pancreatic cysts. Pancreas 2011; 40: 42-45
- 5 Nakai Y, Iwashita T, Shinoura S. et al. Role of serial EUS-guided FNA on pancreatic cystic neoplasms: a retrospective analysis of repeat carcinoembryonic antigen measurements. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 84: 780-784
- 6 Napoleon B, Lemaistre AI, Pujol B. et al. A novel approach to the diagnosis of pancreatic serous cystadenoma: needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 26-32
- 7 Napoleon B, Lemaistre AI, Pujol B. et al. In vivo characterization of pancreatic cystic lesions by needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (nCLE): proposition of a comprehensive nCLE classification confirmed by an external retrospective evaluation. Surg Endosc 2016; 30: 2603-2612
- 8 Bruno MJ. Novel diagnostic approach to pancreatic cysts: is confocal laser endomicroscopy bridging the gap?. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 4-5
- 9 Jais B, Rebours V, Malleo G. et al. Serous cystic neoplasm of the pancreas: a multinational study of 2622 patients under the auspices of the International Association of Pancreatology and European Pancreatic Club (European Study Group on Cystic Tumors of the Pancreas). Gut 2016; 65: 305-312
- 10 Brugge WR, Lauwers GY, Sahani D. et al. Cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. NEJM 2004; 351: 1218-1226
- 11 Belsley NA, Pitman MB, Lauwers GY. et al. Serous cystadenoma of the pancreas: limitations and pitfalls of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Cancer 2008; 114: 102-110
- 12 Le Borgne J, de Calan L, Partensky C. Cystadenomas and cystadenocarcinomas of the pancreas: a multiinstitutional retrospective study of 398 cases. French Surgical Association. Ann Surg 1999; 230: 152-161
- 13 Maker AV, Lee LS, Raut CP. et al. Cytology from pancreatic cysts has marginal utility in surgical decision-making. Ann Surg Oncol 2008; 15: 3187-3192
- 14 Müssle B, Distler M, Wolk S. et al. Management of patients with pancreatic cystic lesions: a case-based survey. Pancreatology 2017; 17: 431-437
- 15 Thornton GD, McPhail MJ, Nayagam S. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration for the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasms: a meta-analysis. Pancreatology 2013; 13: 48-57
- 16 Thosani N, Thosani S, Qiao W. et al. Role of EUS-FNA-based cytology in the diagnosis of mucinous pancreatic cystic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci 2010; 55: 2756-2766
- 17 Tseng JF, Warshaw AL, Sahani DV. et al. Serous cystadenoma of the pancreas: tumor growth rates and recommendations for treatment. Ann Surg 2005; 242: 413-419
- 18 Fernandez-del Castillo C, Targarona J, Thayer SP. et al. Incidental pancreatic cysts: clinicopathologic characteristics and comparison with symptomatic patients. Arch Surg 2003; 138: 427-433
- 19 Agence Technique de l’Information su l’Hospitalisation. Available from: www.atih.sante.fr/ (Accessed: 12 September 2017 [in French])
- 20 Vege SS, Ziring B, Jain R. et al. American gastroenterological association institute guideline on the diagnosis and management of asymptomatic neoplastic pancreatic cysts. Gastroenterology 2015; 148: 819-822
- 21 Napoleon B, Pujol B, Palazzo M. et al. Needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (nCLE) for the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions: preliminary results of the first prospective multicenter study (Abstract 602). Gastroenterology 2017; 152: S132-S133