Development and validation of an algorithm to complete colonoscopy using standard endoscopes in patients with prior incomplete colonoscopy

Abstract

Background and study aims Incomplete colonoscopy may occur as a result of colon angulation (adhesions or diverticulosis), endoscope looping, or both. Specialty endoscopes/devices have been shown to successfully complete prior incomplete colonoscopies, but may not be widely available. Radiographic or other image-based evaluations have been shown to be effective but may miss small or flat lesions, and colonoscopy is often still indicated if a large lesion is identified. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate an algorithm to determine the optimum endoscope to ensure completion of the examination in patients with prior incomplete colonoscopy.

Patients and methods This was a prospective cohort study of 175 patients with prior incomplete colonoscopy who were referred to a single endoscopist at a single academic medical center over a 3-year period from 2012 through 2015. Colonoscopy outcomes from the initial 50 patients were used to develop an algorithm to determine the optimal standard endoscope and technique to achieve cecal intubation. The algorithm was validated on the subsequent 125 patients.

Results The overall repeat colonoscopy success rate using a standard endoscope was 94 %. The initial standard endoscope specified by the algorithm was used and completed the colonoscopy in 90 % of patients.

Conclusions This study identifies an effective strategy for completing colonoscopy in patients with prior incomplete examination, using widely available standard endoscopes and an algorithm based on patient characteristics and reasons for prior incomplete colonoscopy.

• References

• 1 Rex DK, Bond JH, Winawer S. et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 1296-1308
• 2 Shah HA, Paszat LF, Saskin R. et al. Factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy: a population-based study. Gastroenterology 2007; 132: 2297-2303
• 3 Aslinia F, Uradomo L, Steele A. et al. Quality assessment of colonoscopic cecal intubation: an analysis of 6 years of continuous practice at a university hospital. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 721-731
• 4 Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Jansen L. et al. Role of colonoscopy and polyp characteristics in colorectal cancer after colonoscopic polyp detection: a population-based case-control study. Ann Intern Med 2012; 157: 225-232
• 5 Gawron AJ, Veerappan A, Keswani RN. High success rate of repeat colonoscopy with standard endoscopes in patients referred for prior incomplete colonoscopy. BMC Gastroenterol 2014; 14: 56
• 6 Copel L, Sosna J, Kruskal JB. et al. CT colonography in 546 patients with incomplete colonoscopy. Radiology 2007; 244: 471-478
• 7 Triantafyllou K, Viazis N, Tsibouris P. et al. Colon capsule endoscopy is feasible to perform after incomplete colonoscopy and guides further workup in clinical practice. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79: 307-316
• 8 Moreels TG, Macken EJ, Roth B. et al. Cecal intubation rate with the double-balloon endoscope after incomplete conventional colonoscopy: a study in 45 patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 25: 80-83
• 9 Sulz MC, Frei R, Semadeni GM. et al. The role of single-balloon colonoscopy for patients with previous incomplete standard colonoscopy: is it worth doing it?. Surg Endosc 2016; 30: 1876-1882
• 10 Yamada A, Watabe H, Takano N. et al. Utility of single and double balloon endoscopy in patients with difficult colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19: 4732-4736
• 11 Asai S, Fujimoto N, Tanoue K. et al. Water immersion colonoscopy facilitates straight passage of the colonoscope through the sigmoid colon without loop formation: randomized controlled trial. Dig Endosc 2015; 27: 345-353
• 12 Vemulapalli KC, Rex DK. Water immersion simplifies cecal intubation in patients with redundant colons and previous incomplete colonoscopies. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 812-817
• 13 Leung FW, Amato A, Ell C. et al. Water-aided colonoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 657-666
• 14 Bourke MJ, Rex DK. Tips for better colonoscopy from two experts. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107: 1467-1472
• 15 Park DI, Kim HJ, Park JH. et al. Factors affecting abdominal pain during colonoscopy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 19: 695-699
• 16 Sali L, Falchini M, Bonanomi AG. et al. CT colonography after incomplete colonoscopy in subjects with positive faecal occult blood test. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14: 4499-4504
• 17 Pullens HJ, van Leeuwen MS, Laheij RJ. et al. CT-colonography after incomplete colonoscopy: what is the diagnostic yield?. Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56: 593-599
• 18 Rex DK, Adler SN, Aisenberg J. et al. Accuracy of capsule colonoscopy in detecting colorectal polyps in a screening population. Gastroenterology 2015; 148: 948-957
• 19 Rex DK, Chen SC, Overhiser AJ. Colonoscopy technique in consecutive patients referred for prior incomplete colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 5: 879-883
• 20 Bick BL, Vemulapalli KC, Rex DK. The regional center for complex colonoscopy: yield of neoplasia in patients with prior incomplete colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83: 1239-1244
• 21 Kahi CJ, Li X, Eckert GJ. et al. High colonoscopic prevalence of proximal colon serrated polyps in average-risk men and women. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 515-520
• 22 Britton EJ, Sidhu S, Geraghty J. et al. The 5-year outcome of patients having incomplete colonoscopy. Colorectal Dis 2015; 17: 298-303