Computer-assisted instruction before colonoscopy is as effective as nurse counselling, a clinical pilot trial

Abstract

Background and study aims Better patient education prior to colonoscopy improves adherence to instructions for bowel preparation and leads to cleaner colons. We reasoned that computer assisted instruction (CAI) using video and 3 D animations followed by nurse contact maximizes the effectiveness of nurse counselling, increases proportion of clean colons and improves patient experience.

Patients and methods Adults referred for colonoscopy in a high-volume endoscopy unit in the Netherlands were included. Exclusion criteria were illiteracy in Dutch and audiovisual handicaps. Patients were prospectively divided into 2 groups, 1 group received nurse counselling and 1 group received CAI and a nurse contact before colonoscopy. The main outcome, cleanliness of the colon during examination, was measured with Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale (OBPS) and Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). We assessed patient comfort and anxiety at 3 different time points.

Results We included 385 patients: 197 received traditional nurse counselling and 188 received CAI. Overall patient response rates were 99 %, 76.4 % and 69.9 % respectively. Endoscopists scored cleanliness in 60.8 %. Comparative analysis of the 39.2 % of patients with missing scores showed no significant difference on age, gender or educational level. Baseline characteristics were evenly distributed over the groups. Bowel cleanliness was satisfactory and did not differ amongst groups: nurse vs. CAI group scores in BBPS: (6.54 ± 1.69 vs. 6.42 ± 1.62); OBPS: (6.07 ± 2.53 vs. 5.80 ± 2.90). Patient comfort scores were significantly higher (4.29 ± 0.62 vs. 4.42 ± 0.68) in the CAI group shortly before colonoscopy. Anxiety and knowledge scores were similar.

Conclusion CAI is a safe and practical tool to instruct patients before colonoscopy. We recommend the combination of CAI with a short nurse contact for daily practice.

• References

• 1 Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O'Brien MJ. et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 687-696
• 2 Couric K. An unexpected turn: My life as a cancer advocate. Am J Gastroenterol 2016; 111: 594-595
• 3 Bytzer P, Lindeberg B. Impact of an information video before colonoscopy on patient satisfaction and anxiety – a randomized trial. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 710-714
• 4 Rex DK. Optimal bowel preparation--a practical guide for clinicians. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 11: 419-425
• 5 Clark BT, Rustagi T, Laine L. What level of bowel prep quality requires early repeat colonoscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of preparation quality on adenoma detection rate. Am J Gastroenterol 2014; 109: 1714-1723 , quiz 1724
• 6 Rex DK, Imperiale TF, Latinovich DR. et al. Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 1696-1700
• 7 Rosenfeld G, Krygier D, Enns RA. et al. The impact of patient education on the quality of inpatient bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Can J Gastroenterol 2010; 24: 543-546
• 8 Rembacken B, Hassan C, Riemann JF. et al. Quality in screening colonoscopy: position statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). Endoscopy 2012; 44: 957-968
• 9 Calderwood AH, Lai EJ, Fix OK. et al. An endoscopist-blinded, randomized, controlled trial of a simple visual aid to improve bowel preparation for screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 307-314
• 10 Spiegel BM, Talley J, Shekelle P. et al. Development and validation of a novel patient educational booklet to enhance colonoscopy preparation. Am J Gastroenterol 2011; 106: 875-883
• 11 Tae JW, Lee JC, Hong SJ. et al. Impact of patient education with cartoon visual aids on the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 804-811
• 12 Luo YY. Effects of written plus oral information vs. oral information alone on precolonoscopy anxiety. J Clin Nurs 2013; 22: 817-827
• 13 Prakash SR, Verma S, McGowan J. et al. Improving the quality of colonoscopy bowel preparation using an educational video. Can J Gastroenterol 2013; 27: 696-700
• 14 Chang CW, Shih SC, Wang HY. et al. Meta-analysis: The effect of patient education on bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Endosc Int Open 2015; 3: E646-E652
• 15 Shaw MJ, Beebe TJ, Tomshine PA. et al. A randomized, controlled trial of interactive, multimedia software for patient colonoscopy education. J Clin Gastroenterol 2001; 32: 142-147
• 16 Kakkar A, Jacobson BC. Failure of an Internet-based health care intervention for colonoscopy preparation: a caveat for investigators. JAMA Intern Med 2013; 173: 1374-1376
• 17 Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G. et al. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 620-625
• 18 Rostom A, Jolicoeur E. Validation of a new scale for the assessment of bowel preparation quality. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 482-486
• 19 Fox MP. A systematic review of the literature reporting on studies that examined the impact of interactive, computer-based patient education programs. Patient Educ Couns 2009; 77: 6-13
• 20 Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG. et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med 2013; 158: 200-207
• 21 Garg S, Girotra M, Chandra L. et al. Improved bowel preparation with multimedia education in a predominantly African-American population: A randomized study. Diagn Ther Endosc 2016; 2016: 2072401
• 22 Wilson LJ, Yepuri JN, Moses RE. The advantages and challenges of measuring patient experience in outpatient clinical practice. Part 2: History of patient satisfaction in health care. Am J Gastroenterol 2016; 111: 587-588