Increased risk and severity of ERCP-related complications associated with asymptomatic common bile duct stones

Abstract

Background and study aims Endoscopic removal of asymptomatic common bile duct stones (CBDS) is generally recommended. Although many reports have described the risk of complications in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), no studies have addressed this problem in the context of asymptomatic CBDS. This study examines the risk of complications arising in ERCP for asymptomatic CBDS.

Patients and methods This retrospective study included 425 patients with naive papilla who underwent therapeutic ERCP for choledocholithiasis at 2 institutions in Japan for 2 years. The risk of complications was examined in patients who were divided into the asymptomatic and symptomatic CBDS groups. We used propensity score analysis to adjust for confounding effects.

Results Complications were observed in 32 (7.5 %) of the 425 patients. Of the 358 patients with symptomatic CBDS, 14 patients (3.9 %) had complications. In contrast, of the 67 patients with asymptomatic CBDS, 18 patients (26.9 %) had complications. Propensity score analysis revealed that asymptomatic CBDS was a significant risk factor, with a significantly higher incidence of complications compared with symptomatic CBDS (odds ratio, 5.3). Moderate to severe complications were observed in 15 of 18 patients (83.3 %) in the asymptomatic CBDS group, with significantly more moderate to severe complications than those in the symptomatic CBDS (odds ratio, 6.7).

Conclusions Asymptomatic CBDS carried a high risk of ERCP-related complications, and these were often more severe. In asymptomatic CBDS, endoscopic treatment should be carefully performed after considering the patient’s background, and detailed explanation of its possible complications should be given to patients in advance.

• References

• 1 Anderson MA, Fisher L, Jain R. et al. Complications of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 467-473
• 2 Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S. et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 909-918
• 3 Masci E, Toti G, Mariani A. et al. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 417-423
• 4 Freeman ML, DiSario JA, Nelson DB. et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 425-434
• 5 Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G. et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 48: 1-10
• 6 Vandervoort J, Soetikno RM, Tham TC. et al. Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56: 652-656
• 7 Christensen M, Matzen P, Schulze S. et al. Complications of ERCP: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60: 721-731
• 8 Rabenstein T, Schneider HT, Bulling D. et al. Analysis of the risk factors associated with endoscopic sphincterotomy techniques: preliminary results of a prospective study, with emphasis on the reduced risk of acute pancreatitis with low-dose anticoagulation treatment. Endoscopy 2000; 32: 10-19
• 9 Williams EJ, Taylor S, Fairclough P. et al. Risk factors for complication following ERCP; results of a large-scale, prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 793-801
• 10 Colton JB, Curran CC. Quality indicators, including complications, of ERCP in a community setting: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 457-467
• 11 Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J. et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 1991; 37: 383-393
• 12 Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G. et al. Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 1781-1788
• 13 Cotton PB, Garrow DA, Gallagher J. et al. Risk factors for complications after ERCP: a multivariable analysis of 11,497 procedures over 12 years. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 80-88
• 14 Barthet M, Lesavre N, Desjeux A. et al. Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy: results from a single tertiary referral center. Endoscopy 2002; 34: 991-997
• 15 Williams EJ, Green J, Beckingham I. et al. Guidelines on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Gut 2008; 57: 1004-1021
• 16 Maple JT, Ikenberry SO, Anderson MA. et al. The role of endoscopy in the management of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 731-744
• 17 Tazuma S, Unno M, Igarashi Y. et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis 2016. J Gastroenterol 2017; 52: 276-300
• 18 Johnson AG, Hosking SW. Appraisal of the management of bile duct stones. Br J Surg 1987; 74: 555-560
• 19 United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. World Population Prospects: The 2015 Revision, Key Findings and Advance Tables. https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Publications/ Updated 29 July 2015
• 20 Jorgensen J, Kubiliun N, Law JK. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP): core curriculum. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83: 279-289
• 21 Wang P, Li ZS, Liu F. et al. Risk factors for ERCP-related complications: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 31-40
• 22 Kiriyama S, Takada T, Strasberg SM. et al. TG13 guidelines for diagnosis and severity grading of acute cholangitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2013; 20: 24-34
• 23 Pezzilli R, Romboli E, Campana D. et al. Mechanisms involved in the onset of post-ERCP pancreatitis. JOP 2002; 3: 162-168
• 24 Kuo CM, Chiu YC, Liang CM. et al. Limited precut sphincterotomy combined with endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for common bile duct stone removal in patients with difficult biliary cannulation. BMC Gastroenterol 2016; 16: 70
• 25 Collins C, Maguire D, Ireland A. et al. A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited. Ann Surg 2004; 239: 28-33
• 26 Neuhaus H, Feussner H, Ungeheuer A. et al. Prospective evaluation of the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Endoscopy 1992; 24: 745-749
• 27 Welbourn CR, Mehta D, Armstrong CP. et al. Selective preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography with sphincterotomy avoids bile duct exploration during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gut 1995; 37: 576-579
• 28 Gupta N. Role of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in the management of choledocholithiasis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2016; 8: 376-381
• 29 Baucom RB, Feurer ID, Shelton JS. et al. Surgeons, ERCP, and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: do we need a standard approach for common bile duct stones?. Surg Endosc 2016; 30: 414-423
• 30 Nishikawa T, Tsuyuguchi T, Sakai Y. et al. Old age is associated with increased severity of complications in endoscopic biliary stone removal. Dig Endosc 2014; 26: 569-576