CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2017; 05(04): E239-E243
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-100507
Review
Eigentümer und Copyright ©Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2017

When trainees reach competency in performing endoscopic ultrasound: a systematic review

Neal Shahidi
St. Paul’s Hospital, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
,
George Ou
St. Paul’s Hospital, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
,
Eric Lam
St. Paul’s Hospital, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
,
Robert Enns
St. Paul’s Hospital, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
,
Jennifer Telford
St. Paul’s Hospital, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 28 August 2016

accepted after revision 23 December 2016

Publication Date:
28 March 2017 (online)

Abstract

Background/Study aim The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) recommends that trainees complete 150 endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) procedures before assessing competency. However, this recommendation is largely based on limited evidence and expert opinion. With new evidence suggesting that this historical threshold is underestimating training requirements, we evaluated the learning curve for achieving competency in EUS.

Patients/Materials and methods Two investigators independently searched MEDLINE for full-text citations assessing the learning curve for achieving competency in EUS in the period 1946 to 25 March 2016. A learning curve was defined as either a tabulated or graphic representation of competency as a function of increasing EUS experience.

Results Eight studies assessing 28 trainees and 7051 EUS procedures were included. When stratifying studies based on procedural indication: three studies assessed competency in evaluating mucosal lesions, three studies assessed competency in EUS fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA), and two studies assessed comprehensive competency. Among studies assessing mucosal lesion T-staging accuracy, competency was achieved by 65 to 231 procedures. Among studies assessing EUS-FNA, competency was achieved by 30 to 40 procedures. Among the two studies assessing comprehensive competency in EUS, competency was not achieved in either study across all trainees. Only four of 17 trainees reached competency by 225 to 295 EUS procedures.

Conclusion As EUS competency assessment has evolved to more closely reflect independent clinical practice, the number of procedures required to achieve competency has risen well above ASGE recommendations. Advanced endoscopy training programs and specialty societies need to re-assess the structure of EUS training.

 
  • References

  • 1 Early DS, Ben-Menachem T, Decker GA. et al. Appropriate use of GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 1127-1131
  • 2 Boyce WH. Training in endoscopic ultrasonography. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 43: S12-S15
  • 3 DiMaio CJ, Mishra G, McHenry L. et al. EUS core curriculum. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 476-481
  • 4 Eisen GM, Dominitz JA, Faigel DO. et al. Guidelines for credentialing and granting privileges for endoscopic ultrasound. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 811-814
  • 5 Polkowski M, Larghi A, Weynand B. et al. Learning, techniques, and complications of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 190-206
  • 6 Shahidi N, Ou G, Telford J. et al. Establishing the learning curve for achieving competency in performing colonoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 80: 410-416
  • 7 Shahidi N, Ou G, Telford J. et al. When trainees reach competency in performing ERCP: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 1337-1342
  • 8 Wani S, Cote GA, Keswani R. et al. Learning curves for EUS by using cumulative sum analysis: implications for American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy recommendations for training. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 558-565
  • 9 Wani S, Hall M, Keswani RN. et al. Variation in aptitude of trainees in endoscopic ultrasonography, based on cumulative sum analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 13: 1318-1325
  • 10 Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC. et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology. JAMA 2000; 283: 2008-2012
  • 11 Park CH, Park JC, Kim EH. et al. Learning curve for EUS in gastric cancer T staging by using cumulative sum analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 898-905
  • 12 Cote GA, Hovis CE, Kohlmeier C. et al. Training in EUS-guided fine needle aspiration: Safety and diagnostic yield of attending supervised, trainee-directed FNA from the onset of training. Diagn Ther Endosc 2011; 2011: 378540
  • 13 Nayar M, Joy D, Wadehra V. et al. Effect of dedicated and supervised training on achieving competency in EUS-FNA of solid pancreatic lesions. Scand J Gastroenterol 2011; 46: 997-1003
  • 14 Mertz H, Gautam S. The learning curve for EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 33-37
  • 15 Schlick T, Heintz A, Junginger T. The examiner’s learning effect and its influence on the quality of endoscopic ultrasonography in carcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardia. Surg Endosc 1999; 13: 894-898
  • 16 Fockens P, Van den Brande JHM, Van Dullemen HM. et al. Endosonographic T-staging of esophageal carcinoma: a learning curve. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 44: 58-62
  • 17 Azad JS, Verma D, Kapadia AS. et al. Can U.S. GI fellowship programs meet American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy recommendations for training in EUS? A survey of U.S. GI fellowship program directors. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64: 235-243
  • 18 Ekkelenkamp VE, Koch AD, de Man RA. et al. Training and competence assessment in GI endoscopy: a systematic review. Gut 2016; 65: 607-615
  • 19 Meenan J, Anderson S, Tsang S. et al. Training in radial EUS: what is the best approach and is there a role for the nurse endoscopists?. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 1020-1023
  • 20 Wigton RA, Blank LL, Monsur H. et al. Procedural skills of practicing gastroenterologists. A national survey of 700 members of the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 1990; 113: 540-546
  • 21 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Principles of training in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 49: 845-854
  • 22 Wigton RS, Vennes JA. Clinical competence in diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Ann Intern Med 1988; 108: 142-144
  • 23 Cockeram A. Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Practice Guideline for clinical competency in diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Can J Gastroenterol 1997; 11: 539-542
  • 24 Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J. et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 31-53
  • 25 Adler DG, Lieb JG, Cohen J. et al. Quality indicators for ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 54-66
  • 26 Wani S, Wallace MB, Cohen J. et al. Quality indicators for EUS. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 67-80
  • 27 Rosch T. State of the art lecture: Endoscopic ultrasonography: Training and competence. Endoscopy 2006; 38: S69-S72
  • 28 Annema JT, Bohoslavsky R, Burgers S. et al. Implementation of endoscopic ultrasound for lung cancer staging. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 64-70
  • 29 Konge L, Annema J, Vilmann P. et al. Transesophageal ultrasonography for lung cancer staging learning curves of pulmonologists. J Thorac Oncol 2013; 8: 1402-1408
  • 30 Vilmann P, Clementsen PF, Colella S. et al. Combined endobronchial and oesophageal endosonography for the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline, in cooperation with the European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS). Eur Respir J 2015; 46: 40-60