J Wrist Surg 2023; 12(06): 543-548
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1760123
Case Report

Masquelet Procedure for the Treatment of Intra-articular Defects of the Wrist

1   Department of Hand and Wrist Surgery, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
,
Laurien Waaijer*
2   Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
,
Philippe N. d'Ailly
1   Department of Hand and Wrist Surgery, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
,
Niels W.L. Schep
1   Department of Hand and Wrist Surgery, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background The purpose of this case series is to show our experiences with the Masquelet procedure in a variety of infected defects of the wrist.

Case Description All consecutive patients that were treated between 2015 and 2021 were included in this case series. Five patients were included with an infected defect of the wrist, involving the radiocarpal and/or the distal radioulnar joints (DRUJ). All patients underwent thorough debridement of the defect and the created void was filled with a gentamicin/vancomycin cement spacer. Cultures were taken and appropriate antibiotic therapy was initiated. Two patients had a renewal of the cement spacer before definitive surgery. Finally, two patients received a DRUJ prosthesis, two patients had autologous bone grafting and wrist arthrodesis and one patient kept the cement spacer as distal ulna prosthesis due to minor complaints.

Literature Review Current literature provides examples of the Masquelet procedure in traumatic defects or non-unions of the long bones. These cases are almost always about metaphyseal or diaphyseal defects but rarely include intra-articular joint defects therefore no comparisons could be made between the cases we reported with any existing literature.

Clinical Relevance The Masquelet procedure showed to be effective in eradicating infected defects of the wrist involving the radiocarpal joint and/or DRUJ. All patients had an aseptic environment before performing definitive surgery. This technique showed to be save and no reinfections occurred.

* Both authors contributed equally




Publication History

Received: 18 January 2022

Accepted: 18 November 2022

Article published online:
20 January 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Masquelet AC. Muscle reconstruction in reconstructive surgery: soft tissue repair and long bone reconstruction. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2003; 388 (05) 344-346
  • 2 Masquelet A, Kanakaris NK, Obert L, Stafford P, Giannoudis PV. Bone repair using the Masquelet technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2019; 101 (11) 1024-1036
  • 3 Azi ML, Teixeira AAA, Cotias RB, Joeris A, Kfuri M. Induced-membrane technique in the management of posttraumatic bone defects. JBJS Essential Surg Tech 2019; 9 (02) e22
  • 4 Masquelet AC, Begue T. The concept of induced membrane for reconstruction of long bone defects. Orthop Clin North Am 2010; 41 (01) 27-37
  • 5 Pelissier P, Masquelet AC, Bareille R, Pelissier SM, Amedee J. Induced membranes secrete growth factors including vascular and osteoinductive factors and could stimulate bone regeneration. J Orthop Res 2004; 22 (01) 73-79
  • 6 Dhar SA, Dar TA, Mir NA. Management of infected nonunion of the forearm by the masquelet technique. Strateg Trauma Limb Reconstr 2019; 14 (01) 1-5
  • 7 Luo TD, Nunez Jr FA, Lomer AA, Nunez Sr FA. Management of recalcitrant osteomyelitis and segmental bone loss of the forearm with the Masquelet technique. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2017; 42 (06) 640-642
  • 8 Giannoudis PV, Faour O, Goff T, Kanakaris N, Dimitriou R. Masquelet technique for the treatment of bone defects: tips-tricks and future directions. Injury 2011; 42 (06) 591-598
  • 9 Micev AJ, Kalainov DM, Soneru AP. Masquelet technique for treatment of segmental bone loss in the upper extremity. J Hand Surg Am 2015; 40 (03) 593-598