J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2024; 85(01): 038-043
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1760095
Original Article

Survey of Skull Base Surgeons' Approach to Carcinomas Involving the Cavernous Sinus

1   Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
,
1   Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
2   University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
,
Carl H. Snyderman
3   Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
,
Erin L. McKean
4   Department of Otolaryngology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Objectives Carcinomas involving the cavernous sinus are challenging to resect without compromising important neurovascular structures. Given the morbidity and mortality of these operations, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy are more often utilized. Although limited to case reports and small series, radical resection of the cavernous sinus has been proposed. We aimed to study surgeons' willingness to perform cavernous sinus exenteration (CSE) under different clinical scenarios.

Design, Setting, Participants, Main Outcome Measures We conducted an online survey from April to July 2021 among members of the Skull Base Congress and the North American Skull Base Society. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the main outcome measure of willingness to perform CSE.

Results The analytic sample (n = 112) included 54% otolaryngologists and 43% neurosurgeons. Eighty-six percent practiced in an academic setting. Surgeons' willingness to perform CSE was low (6–16% under different clinical scenarios), citing a belief that they could not obtain oncologic margins and the procedure's morbidity. Forty-five percent had at least one patient undergo CSE with 72% of patients surviving no more than 2 years.

Complications included chronic intractable pain, cerebrospinal fluid leak, cerebrovascular accident, and/or intraoperative/postoperative death within 30 days. Sixty percent agreed that the availability of immunotherapy and genomic sequencing has affected their willingness to offer CSE.

Conclusion Overall, most of the surgeons surveyed were unwilling to offer CSE for carcinomatous cavernous sinus invasion, whether for primary disease or recurrence. Given the rarity of these tumors and the limited data on CSE, these results may provide more information for clinicians and patients for these treatment decisions.

Note

This work was presented at the 31st Annual Meeting of the North American Skull Base Society in Phoenix, Arizona, February 2022.




Publication History

Received: 05 July 2022

Accepted: 11 November 2022

Article published online:
28 December 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Patel CR, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Wang WH, Wang EW. Skull base anatomy. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2016; 49 (01) 9-20
  • 2 Raheja A, Couldwell WT. Management of cavernous sinus involvement in sinonasal and ventral skull base malignancies. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2017; 50 (02) 365-383
  • 3 Klinger DR, Flores BC, Lewis JJ, Barnett SL. The treatment of cavernous sinus meningiomas: evolution of a modern approach. Neurosurg Focus 2013; 35 (06) E8
  • 4 Rennert RC, Ravina K, Strickland BA, Bakhsheshian J, Fredrickson VL, Russin JJ. Complete cavernous sinus resection: an analysis of complications. World Neurosurg 2018; 119: 89-96
  • 5 Couldwell WT, MacDonald JD, Taussky P. Complete resection of the cavernous sinus-indications and technique. World Neurosurg 2014; 82 (06) 1264-1270
  • 6 Saito K, Fukuta K, Takahashi M, Tachibana E, Yoshida J. Management of the cavernous sinus in en bloc resections of malignant skull base tumors. Head Neck 1999; 21 (08) 734-742
  • 7 Rueß D, Fritsche F, Grau S. et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery of cavernous sinus meningiomas. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2020; 81 (02) 158-164