Abstract
Introduction The axial vessels like the anterior and posterior tibial emerge as the first choice
of recipient vessels, in free flaps for lower limb trauma. When the defects are located
more proximally in the leg, the deeper course of the axial vessels makes the dissection
more tedious. Alternative vessels like the descending genicular, medial genicular,
and distal end of the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral can be used
for an end-to-end anastomosis, well away from the zone of trauma.
The objective of this study was to define the indications and technique of the use
of the sural vessels as the recipient pedicle for proximal and middle third leg defects.
Patients and Methods For the period 2006 to 2022, 18 leg defects following road traffic accidents were
covered with latissimus dorsi muscle flap using sural vessels as the recipient pedicle.
Results Among 18 patients, 8 patients had defect in proximal third, 8 had a combined defect
in proximal and middle third leg, and 2 had defect in middle third leg. Two patients
developed arterial thrombosis and one patient had venous thrombosis for which re-exploration
was performed. Two flaps were lost and sixteen had successful wound coverage.
Conclusion The sural vessels as recipient pedicle are easier to access and can be considered
as a reliable option for free flaps in limb defects of proximal and middle third leg.
Using the submuscular part of the vessel ensures a better distal reach of the flap.
Keywords
free flap - lower limb trauma - sural vessels - leg defects - recipient vessel
